LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v3 2/2] staging: media: lirc: lirc_zilog.c: keep consistency in dev functions
@ 2014-12-04 22:35 Luis de Bethencourt
  2014-12-05 12:28 ` Dan Carpenter
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Luis de Bethencourt @ 2014-12-04 22:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: m.chehab
  Cc: jarod, gregkh, mahfouz.saif.elyazal, gulsah.1004,
	tuomas.tynkkynen, linux-media, devel, linux-kernel

The previous patch switched some dev functions to move the string to a second
line. Doing this for all similar functions because it makes the driver easier
to read if all similar lines use the same criteria.

Signed-off-by: Luis de Bethencourt <luis@debethencourt.com>
---
 drivers/staging/media/lirc/lirc_zilog.c | 155 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 102 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/lirc/lirc_zilog.c b/drivers/staging/media/lirc/lirc_zilog.c
index 8814a7e..af46827 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/media/lirc/lirc_zilog.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/media/lirc/lirc_zilog.c
@@ -322,7 +322,8 @@ static int add_to_buf(struct IR *ir)
 	struct IR_tx *tx;
 
 	if (lirc_buffer_full(rbuf)) {
-		dev_dbg(ir->l.dev, "buffer overflow\n");
+		dev_dbg(ir->l.dev,
+			"buffer overflow\n");
 		return -EOVERFLOW;
 	}
 
@@ -368,8 +369,9 @@ static int add_to_buf(struct IR *ir)
 		 */
 		ret = i2c_master_send(rx->c, sendbuf, 1);
 		if (ret != 1) {
-			dev_err(ir->l.dev, "i2c_master_send failed with %d\n",
-					   ret);
+			dev_err(ir->l.dev,
+				"i2c_master_send failed with %d\n",
+				ret);
 			if (failures >= 3) {
 				mutex_unlock(&ir->ir_lock);
 				dev_err(ir->l.dev,
@@ -412,8 +414,9 @@ static int add_to_buf(struct IR *ir)
 			rx->b[0] = keybuf[3];
 			rx->b[1] = keybuf[4];
 			rx->b[2] = keybuf[5];
-			dev_dbg(ir->l.dev, "key (0x%02x/0x%02x)\n",
-					   rx->b[0], rx->b[1]);
+			dev_dbg(ir->l.dev,
+				"key (0x%02x/0x%02x)\n",
+				rx->b[0], rx->b[1]);
 		}
 
 		/* key pressed ? */
@@ -464,7 +467,8 @@ static int lirc_thread(void *arg)
 	struct IR *ir = arg;
 	struct lirc_buffer *rbuf = ir->l.rbuf;
 
-	dev_dbg(ir->l.dev, "poll thread started\n");
+	dev_dbg(ir->l.dev,
+		"poll thread started\n");
 
 	while (!kthread_should_stop()) {
 		set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
@@ -492,7 +496,8 @@ static int lirc_thread(void *arg)
 			wake_up_interruptible(&rbuf->wait_poll);
 	}
 
-	dev_dbg(ir->l.dev, "poll thread ended\n");
+	dev_dbg(ir->l.dev,
+		"poll thread ended\n");
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -654,11 +659,14 @@ static int send_data_block(struct IR_tx *tx, unsigned char *data_block)
 		buf[0] = (unsigned char)(i + 1);
 		for (j = 0; j < tosend; ++j)
 			buf[1 + j] = data_block[i + j];
-		dev_dbg(tx->ir->l.dev, "%*ph", 5, buf);
+		dev_dbg(tx->ir->l.dev,
+			"%*ph",
+			5, buf);
 		ret = i2c_master_send(tx->c, buf, tosend + 1);
 		if (ret != tosend + 1) {
-			dev_err(tx->ir->l.dev, "i2c_master_send failed with %d\n",
-					       ret);
+			dev_err(tx->ir->l.dev,
+				"i2c_master_send failed with %d\n",
+				ret);
 			return ret < 0 ? ret : -EFAULT;
 		}
 		i += tosend;
@@ -682,7 +690,9 @@ static int send_boot_data(struct IR_tx *tx)
 	buf[1] = 0x20;
 	ret = i2c_master_send(tx->c, buf, 2);
 	if (ret != 2) {
-		dev_err(tx->ir->l.dev, "i2c_master_send failed with %d\n", ret);
+		dev_err(tx->ir->l.dev,
+			"i2c_master_send failed with %d\n",
+			ret);
 		return ret < 0 ? ret : -EFAULT;
 	}
 
@@ -699,19 +709,24 @@ static int send_boot_data(struct IR_tx *tx)
 	}
 
 	if (ret != 1) {
-		dev_err(tx->ir->l.dev, "i2c_master_send failed with %d\n", ret);
+		dev_err(tx->ir->l.dev,
+			"i2c_master_send failed with %d\n",
+			ret);
 		return ret < 0 ? ret : -EFAULT;
 	}
 
 	/* Here comes the firmware version... (hopefully) */
 	ret = i2c_master_recv(tx->c, buf, 4);
 	if (ret != 4) {
-		dev_err(tx->ir->l.dev, "i2c_master_recv failed with %d\n", ret);
+		dev_err(tx->ir->l.dev,
+			"i2c_master_recv failed with %d\n",
+			ret);
 		return 0;
 	}
 	if ((buf[0] != 0x80) && (buf[0] != 0xa0)) {
-		dev_err(tx->ir->l.dev, "unexpected IR TX init response: %02x\n",
-				       buf[0]);
+		dev_err(tx->ir->l.dev,
+			"unexpected IR TX init response: %02x\n",
+			buf[0]);
 		return 0;
 	}
 	dev_notice(tx->ir->l.dev,
@@ -763,12 +778,15 @@ static int fw_load(struct IR_tx *tx)
 	/* Request codeset data file */
 	ret = request_firmware(&fw_entry, "haup-ir-blaster.bin", tx->ir->l.dev);
 	if (ret != 0) {
-		dev_err(tx->ir->l.dev, "firmware haup-ir-blaster.bin not available (%d)\n",
-			    ret);
+		dev_err(tx->ir->l.dev,
+			"firmware haup-ir-blaster.bin not available (%d)\n",
+			ret);
 		ret = ret < 0 ? ret : -EFAULT;
 		goto out;
 	}
-	dev_dbg(tx->ir->l.dev, "firmware of size %zu loaded\n", fw_entry->size);
+	dev_dbg(tx->ir->l.dev,
+		"firmware of size %zu loaded\n",
+		fw_entry->size);
 
 	/* Parse the file */
 	tx_data = vmalloc(sizeof(*tx_data));
@@ -813,8 +831,9 @@ static int fw_load(struct IR_tx *tx)
 			      &tx_data->num_code_sets))
 		goto corrupt;
 
-	dev_dbg(tx->ir->l.dev, "%u IR blaster codesets loaded\n",
-			       tx_data->num_code_sets);
+	dev_dbg(tx->ir->l.dev,
+		"%u IR blaster codesets loaded\n",
+		tx_data->num_code_sets);
 
 	tx_data->code_sets = vmalloc(
 		tx_data->num_code_sets * sizeof(char *));
@@ -878,7 +897,8 @@ static int fw_load(struct IR_tx *tx)
 	goto out;
 
 corrupt:
-	dev_err(tx->ir->l.dev, "firmware is corrupt\n");
+	dev_err(tx->ir->l.dev,
+		"firmware is corrupt\n");
 	fw_unload_locked();
 	ret = -EFAULT;
 
@@ -898,9 +918,11 @@ static ssize_t read(struct file *filep, char __user *outbuf, size_t n,
 	unsigned int m;
 	DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, current);
 
-	dev_dbg(ir->l.dev, "read called\n");
+	dev_dbg(ir->l.dev,
+		"read called\n");
 	if (n % rbuf->chunk_size) {
-		dev_dbg(ir->l.dev, "read result = -EINVAL\n");
+		dev_dbg(ir->l.dev,
+			"read result = -EINVAL\n");
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
@@ -944,8 +966,9 @@ static ssize_t read(struct file *filep, char __user *outbuf, size_t n,
 			unsigned char buf[MAX_XFER_SIZE];
 
 			if (rbuf->chunk_size > sizeof(buf)) {
-				dev_err(ir->l.dev, "chunk_size is too big (%d)!\n",
-					    rbuf->chunk_size);
+				dev_err(ir->l.dev,
+					"chunk_size is too big (%d)!\n",
+					rbuf->chunk_size);
 				ret = -EINVAL;
 				break;
 			}
@@ -958,7 +981,8 @@ static ssize_t read(struct file *filep, char __user *outbuf, size_t n,
 				retries++;
 			}
 			if (retries >= 5) {
-				dev_err(ir->l.dev, "Buffer read failed!\n");
+				dev_err(ir->l.dev,
+					"Buffer read failed!\n");
 				ret = -EIO;
 			}
 		}
@@ -968,8 +992,9 @@ static ssize_t read(struct file *filep, char __user *outbuf, size_t n,
 	put_ir_rx(rx, false);
 	set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
 
-	dev_dbg(ir->l.dev, "read result = %d (%s)\n",
-			   ret, ret ? "Error" : "OK");
+	dev_dbg(ir->l.dev,
+		"read result = %d (%s)\n",
+		ret, ret ? "Error" : "OK");
 
 	return ret ? ret : written;
 }
@@ -1002,7 +1027,9 @@ static int send_code(struct IR_tx *tx, unsigned int code, unsigned int key)
 	buf[1] = 0x40;
 	ret = i2c_master_send(tx->c, buf, 2);
 	if (ret != 2) {
-		dev_err(tx->ir->l.dev, "i2c_master_send failed with %d\n", ret);
+		dev_err(tx->ir->l.dev,
+			"i2c_master_send failed with %d\n",
+			ret);
 		return ret < 0 ? ret : -EFAULT;
 	}
 
@@ -1015,18 +1042,23 @@ static int send_code(struct IR_tx *tx, unsigned int code, unsigned int key)
 	}
 
 	if (ret != 1) {
-		dev_err(tx->ir->l.dev, "i2c_master_send failed with %d\n", ret);
+		dev_err(tx->ir->l.dev,
+			"i2c_master_send failed with %d\n",
+			ret);
 		return ret < 0 ? ret : -EFAULT;
 	}
 
 	/* Send finished download? */
 	ret = i2c_master_recv(tx->c, buf, 1);
 	if (ret != 1) {
-		dev_err(tx->ir->l.dev, "i2c_master_recv failed with %d\n", ret);
+		dev_err(tx->ir->l.dev,
+			"i2c_master_recv failed with %d\n",
+			ret);
 		return ret < 0 ? ret : -EFAULT;
 	}
 	if (buf[0] != 0xA0) {
-		dev_err(tx->ir->l.dev, "unexpected IR TX response #1: %02x\n",
+		dev_err(tx->ir->l.dev,
+			"unexpected IR TX response #1: %02x\n",
 			buf[0]);
 		return -EFAULT;
 	}
@@ -1036,7 +1068,9 @@ static int send_code(struct IR_tx *tx, unsigned int code, unsigned int key)
 	buf[1] = 0x80;
 	ret = i2c_master_send(tx->c, buf, 2);
 	if (ret != 2) {
-		dev_err(tx->ir->l.dev, "i2c_master_send failed with %d\n", ret);
+		dev_err(tx->ir->l.dev,
+			"i2c_master_send failed with %d\n",
+			ret);
 		return ret < 0 ? ret : -EFAULT;
 	}
 
@@ -1046,7 +1080,9 @@ static int send_code(struct IR_tx *tx, unsigned int code, unsigned int key)
 	 * going to skip this whole mess and say we're done on the HD PVR
 	 */
 	if (!tx->post_tx_ready_poll) {
-		dev_dbg(tx->ir->l.dev, "sent code %u, key %u\n", code, key);
+		dev_dbg(tx->ir->l.dev,
+			"sent code %u, key %u\n",
+			code, key);
 		return 0;
 	}
 
@@ -1076,17 +1112,22 @@ static int send_code(struct IR_tx *tx, unsigned int code, unsigned int key)
 	/* Seems to be an 'ok' response */
 	i = i2c_master_recv(tx->c, buf, 1);
 	if (i != 1) {
-		dev_err(tx->ir->l.dev, "i2c_master_recv failed with %d\n", ret);
+		dev_err(tx->ir->l.dev,
+			"i2c_master_recv failed with %d\n",
+			ret);
 		return -EFAULT;
 	}
 	if (buf[0] != 0x80) {
-		dev_err(tx->ir->l.dev, "unexpected IR TX response #2: %02x\n",
-				       buf[0]);
+		dev_err(tx->ir->l.dev,
+			"unexpected IR TX response #2: %02x\n",
+			buf[0]);
 		return -EFAULT;
 	}
 
 	/* Oh good, it worked */
-	dev_dbg(tx->ir->l.dev, "sent code %u, key %u\n", code, key);
+	dev_dbg(tx->ir->l.dev,
+		"sent code %u, key %u\n",
+		code, key);
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -1211,7 +1252,8 @@ static unsigned int poll(struct file *filep, poll_table *wait)
 	struct lirc_buffer *rbuf = ir->l.rbuf;
 	unsigned int ret;
 
-	dev_dbg(ir->l.dev, "poll called\n");
+	dev_dbg(ir->l.dev,
+		"poll called\n");
 
 	rx = get_ir_rx(ir);
 	if (rx == NULL) {
@@ -1219,7 +1261,8 @@ static unsigned int poll(struct file *filep, poll_table *wait)
 		 * Revisit this, if our poll function ever reports writeable
 		 * status for Tx
 		 */
-		dev_dbg(ir->l.dev, "poll result = POLLERR\n");
+		dev_dbg(ir->l.dev,
+			"poll result = POLLERR\n");
 		return POLLERR;
 	}
 
@@ -1232,8 +1275,9 @@ static unsigned int poll(struct file *filep, poll_table *wait)
 	/* Indicate what ops could happen immediately without blocking */
 	ret = lirc_buffer_empty(rbuf) ? 0 : (POLLIN|POLLRDNORM);
 
-	dev_dbg(ir->l.dev, "poll result = %s\n",
-			   ret ? "POLLIN|POLLRDNORM" : "none");
+	dev_dbg(ir->l.dev,
+		"poll result = %s\n",
+		ret ? "POLLIN|POLLRDNORM" : "none");
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -1340,7 +1384,8 @@ static int close(struct inode *node, struct file *filep)
 	struct IR *ir = filep->private_data;
 
 	if (ir == NULL) {
-		dev_err(ir->l.dev, "close: no private_data attached to the file!\n");
+		dev_err(ir->l.dev,
+			"close: no private_data attached to the file!\n");
 		return -ENODEV;
 	}
 
@@ -1452,7 +1497,8 @@ static int ir_probe(struct i2c_client *client, const struct i2c_device_id *id)
 	int ret;
 	bool tx_probe = false;
 
-	dev_dbg(&client->dev, "%s: %s on i2c-%d (%s), client addr=0x%02x\n",
+	dev_dbg(&client->dev,
+		"%s: %s on i2c-%d (%s), client addr=0x%02x\n",
 		__func__, id->name, adap->nr, adap->name, client->addr);
 
 	/*
@@ -1611,13 +1657,15 @@ static int ir_probe(struct i2c_client *client, const struct i2c_device_id *id)
 	ir->l.minor = minor; /* module option: user requested minor number */
 	ir->l.minor = lirc_register_driver(&ir->l);
 	if (ir->l.minor < 0 || ir->l.minor >= MAX_IRCTL_DEVICES) {
-		dev_err(tx->ir->l.dev, "%s: \"minor\" must be between 0 and %d (%d)!\n",
-			    __func__, MAX_IRCTL_DEVICES-1, ir->l.minor);
+		dev_err(tx->ir->l.dev,
+			"%s: \"minor\" must be between 0 and %d (%d)!\n",
+			__func__, MAX_IRCTL_DEVICES-1, ir->l.minor);
 		ret = -EBADRQC;
 		goto out_put_xx;
 	}
-	dev_info(ir->l.dev, "IR unit on %s (i2c-%d) registered as lirc%d and ready\n",
-		   adap->name, adap->nr, ir->l.minor);
+	dev_info(ir->l.dev,
+		 "IR unit on %s (i2c-%d) registered as lirc%d and ready\n",
+		 adap->name, adap->nr, ir->l.minor);
 
 out_ok:
 	if (rx != NULL)
@@ -1625,8 +1673,9 @@ out_ok:
 	if (tx != NULL)
 		put_ir_tx(tx, true);
 	put_ir_device(ir, true);
-	dev_info(ir->l.dev, "probe of IR %s on %s (i2c-%d) done\n",
-		   tx_probe ? "Tx" : "Rx", adap->name, adap->nr);
+	dev_info(ir->l.dev,
+		 "probe of IR %s on %s (i2c-%d) done\n",
+		 tx_probe ? "Tx" : "Rx", adap->name, adap->nr);
 	mutex_unlock(&ir_devices_lock);
 	return 0;
 
@@ -1638,9 +1687,9 @@ out_put_xx:
 out_put_ir:
 	put_ir_device(ir, true);
 out_no_ir:
-	dev_err(&client->dev, "%s: probing IR %s on %s (i2c-%d) failed with %d\n",
-		    __func__, tx_probe ? "Tx" : "Rx", adap->name, adap->nr,
-		   ret);
+	dev_err(&client->dev,
+		"%s: probing IR %s on %s (i2c-%d) failed with %d\n",
+		__func__, tx_probe ? "Tx" : "Rx", adap->name, adap->nr, ret);
 	mutex_unlock(&ir_devices_lock);
 	return ret;
 }
-- 
2.1.3


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] staging: media: lirc: lirc_zilog.c: keep consistency in dev functions
  2014-12-04 22:35 [PATCH v3 2/2] staging: media: lirc: lirc_zilog.c: keep consistency in dev functions Luis de Bethencourt
@ 2014-12-05 12:28 ` Dan Carpenter
       [not found]   ` <CAPA4HGVhKuw6cQHMfRWrTLxd8u3P8a1noAPkzkgrFmsORgXUgw@mail.gmail.com>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dan Carpenter @ 2014-12-05 12:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Luis de Bethencourt
  Cc: m.chehab, devel, gulsah.1004, gregkh, jarod, linux-kernel,
	tuomas.tynkkynen, linux-media

On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 10:35:24PM +0000, Luis de Bethencourt wrote:
> The previous patch switched some dev functions to move the string to a second
> line. Doing this for all similar functions because it makes the driver easier
> to read if all similar lines use the same criteria.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Luis de Bethencourt <luis@debethencourt.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/media/lirc/lirc_zilog.c | 155 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 102 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/lirc/lirc_zilog.c b/drivers/staging/media/lirc/lirc_zilog.c
> index 8814a7e..af46827 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/media/lirc/lirc_zilog.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/media/lirc/lirc_zilog.c
> @@ -322,7 +322,8 @@ static int add_to_buf(struct IR *ir)
>  	struct IR_tx *tx;
>  
>  	if (lirc_buffer_full(rbuf)) {
> -		dev_dbg(ir->l.dev, "buffer overflow\n");
> +		dev_dbg(ir->l.dev,
> +			"buffer overflow\n");

No.  Don't do this.  It's better if it is on one line.

regards,
dan carpenter


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] staging: media: lirc: lirc_zilog.c: keep consistency in dev functions
       [not found]   ` <CAPA4HGVhKuw6cQHMfRWrTLxd8u3P8a1noAPkzkgrFmsORgXUgw@mail.gmail.com>
@ 2014-12-06  1:40     ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab @ 2014-12-06  1:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Luis de Bethencourt
  Cc: Dan Carpenter, devel, Gülşah Köse,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman, jarod, linux-kernel, tuomas.tynkkynen,
	linux-media

Em Fri, 05 Dec 2014 12:35:25 +0000
Luis de Bethencourt <luis@debethencourt.com> escreveu:

> On 5 December 2014 at 12:28, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 10:35:24PM +0000, Luis de Bethencourt wrote:
> > > The previous patch switched some dev functions to move the string to a
> > second
> > > line. Doing this for all similar functions because it makes the driver
> > easier
> > > to read if all similar lines use the same criteria.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Luis de Bethencourt <luis@debethencourt.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/staging/media/lirc/lirc_zilog.c | 155
> > +++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> > >  1 file changed, 102 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/lirc/lirc_zilog.c
> > b/drivers/staging/media/lirc/lirc_zilog.c
> > > index 8814a7e..af46827 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/staging/media/lirc/lirc_zilog.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/staging/media/lirc/lirc_zilog.c
> > > @@ -322,7 +322,8 @@ static int add_to_buf(struct IR *ir)
> > >       struct IR_tx *tx;
> > >
> > >       if (lirc_buffer_full(rbuf)) {
> > > -             dev_dbg(ir->l.dev, "buffer overflow\n");
> > > +             dev_dbg(ir->l.dev,
> > > +                     "buffer overflow\n");
> >
> > No.  Don't do this.  It's better if it is on one line.
> >
> > regards,
> > dan carpenter
> >
> >
> I was following Mauro's suggestions. As replied to the previous version of
> the patch.
> 
> I agree that in short uses of dev_dbg it adds unnecessary lines and
> vertical length to the file.

In the specific case that Dan pointed, the entire statement fits 
on 80 cols. We only add vertical alignments when it doesn't fit on
80 columns.

> 
> Thanks for looking at my patch :)
> 
> Luis


-- 

Cheers,
Mauro

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2014-12-06  1:40 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-12-04 22:35 [PATCH v3 2/2] staging: media: lirc: lirc_zilog.c: keep consistency in dev functions Luis de Bethencourt
2014-12-05 12:28 ` Dan Carpenter
     [not found]   ` <CAPA4HGVhKuw6cQHMfRWrTLxd8u3P8a1noAPkzkgrFmsORgXUgw@mail.gmail.com>
2014-12-06  1:40     ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).