LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
To: "long.wanglong" <long.wanglong@huawei.com>
Cc: hannes@cmpxchg.org, shijie8@gmail.com,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, azurit@pobox.sk,
hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk, rientjes@google.com,
kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
peifeiyue@huawei.com
Subject: Re: does the semantics of MAP_LOCKED is equal to mlock() function?
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 10:46:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150119094656.GA21052@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54BCA187.6070601@huawei.com>
See http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=142122902313315&w=2 for more
information.
On Mon 19-01-15 14:17:43, long.wanglong wrote:
> Hi all:
>
> In the latest kernel, i set the memory limit (4096) in a test cgroup. and add the test task.
> the test code code is:
>
> testcase 1: mmap with MAP_LOCKED flag(memsize = 8192)
>
> 185 p = mmap(NULL, memsize, PROT_WRITE | PROT_READ,
> 186 MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_LOCKED, 0, 0);
> 187 if (p == MAP_FAILED)
> 188 err(1, "mmap(lock) failed");
>
> expect: invoke OOM killer.
> result: not invoke OOM killer.
>
>
> testcase 2: mmap without MAP_LOCKED flag and the call mlock (memsize = 8192)
>
> 185 p = mmap(NULL, memsize, PROT_WRITE | PROT_READ,
> 186 MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS, 0, 0);
> 187 if (p == MAP_FAILED)
> 188 err(1, "mmap(lock) failed");
> 189
> 190 if (mlock(p, memsize) == -1)
> 191 err(1, "mlock failed")
>
> expect: invoke OOM killer.
> result: invoke OOM killer.
>
> in the Linux Programmer's Manual:
>
> MAP_LOCKED (since Linux 2.5.37)
> Lock the pages of the mapped region into memory in the manner
> of mlock(2). This flag is ignored in older kernels.
>
> and
> mlock() locks pages in the address range starting at addr and
> continuing for len bytes. All pages that contain a part of the
> specified address range are guaranteed to be resident in RAM when the
> call returns successfully; the pages are guaranteed to stay in RAM
> until later unlocked.
>
> According to the description in the manual, the two testcases are equivalent.
>
> why the first testcase does not invoke OOM killer?
> does the mmap with MAP_LOCKED flag will not immediately allocate physical memory?
>
>
> Best Regards
> Wang Long
>
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-19 9:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-19 6:17 long.wanglong
2015-01-19 9:46 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2015-01-19 11:01 ` Michal Hocko
2015-01-20 3:23 ` long.wanglong
2015-01-20 12:58 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150119094656.GA21052@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=azurit@pobox.sk \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=long.wanglong@huawei.com \
--cc=peifeiyue@huawei.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=shijie8@gmail.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--subject='Re: does the semantics of MAP_LOCKED is equal to mlock() function?' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).