From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755213AbbAWMpq (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jan 2015 07:45:46 -0500 Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk ([106.187.55.193]:58492 "EHLO mezzanine.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752249AbbAWMpm (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jan 2015 07:45:42 -0500 Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 12:45:29 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: Esben Haabendal Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, Stefan Roese Message-ID: <20150123124529.GU21293@sirena.org.uk> References: <1420472564.803.9.camel@gmail.com> <20150105154834.GV11764@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2DJuma0xDHN2clgl" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Cookie: My LESLIE GORE record is BROKEN ... User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 94.175.94.161 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: Backport of spi-fsl-spi bugfix to 3.14.y X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mezzanine.sirena.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --2DJuma0xDHN2clgl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 10:15:47PM +0100, Esben Haabendal wrote: > On 5 January 2015 at 16:48, Mark Brown wrote: > >> Please consider commit 4302a59629f7a0bd70fd1605d2b558597517372a > >> (spi: fsl: Fix problem with multi message transfers) for inclusion in > >> stable kernel 3.14. > >> It fixes a regression when using mmc_spi driver on top of spi-fsl-spi > >> driver (tested with powerpc mpc8313 based board). > > Has this ever worked? > Yes, I have used mmc_spi with spi-fsl-spi on the same board with success > with in 2.6.33, 3.0 and 3.4. > I have no idea what has caused this to break. Maybe mmc_spi driver was > not doing multi message transfers earlier? So, I now see this has actually been merged into stable without getting to the bottom of why it's helping anything... this is a bit worrying since it's adding new functionality and not really a bug fix. It'd have been good to at least get a followup here. --2DJuma0xDHN2clgl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJUwkJpAAoJECTWi3JdVIfQPo8H/RffkPqLY2puXJqYxZVPSKSw sJMTg3QCJ9I7FW9FfU2wz4wrDFtV8hvMmfnnjZgv8uQVlbgkAGxO4S7K+UuQq+z9 g+Yu7AYzgJC3n9OURVc9u1S3tFUULFM3isbIW7eTQNHa2De3GfEEjIjAepfAy2uE e7DNgA3OHceEBQ3LHflonH7qyBzPl6wEGxMp8BYfT4fmxEGeYn7aKZJlYT4rXDa0 MJoSgkeK3XmhOt2VYwKXRLwccvMHn78MSEsR2g23EY6txWsJmYX/K3gNUvPAcT3K xzTplu/mOgakJgQ4aOwsqHBnkGSs0Bo1g0DZj3eN4UrNa4m0AsMIkd6McUAU9rs= =QO5v -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2DJuma0xDHN2clgl--