LKML Archive on
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sylvain Rochet <>
To: Alexandre Belloni <>
Cc: Wenyou Yang <>,,,,,
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/12] pm: at91: rename file name: pm_slowclock.S -->pm_suspend.S
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 14:30:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

Hello Alexandre,

On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 12:17:38AM +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> This is a rework, what is part of linux-3.10-at91 and not yet present in
> mainline should be part of a following series. I would prefer not mixing
> reworks and "new" functionalities (they have been present in the atmel
> tree for a while but never mainlined).

I agree, I just didn't know a new series will follow, maybe I missed 
this point.

Maybe I am a bit too picky (or boring: if I am, please told me), but 
this series by itself adds regression to all users of >= 9x5 boards 
(sama5, …) because it merges MEM target and MEM+SLOW_CLOCK target, which 
used to be too different target states, not selectable at runtime indeed 
but this is still in practice two different target states. Note that I 
am not saying that MEM target and MEM+SLOW_CLOCK target should not be 
merged, they should, absolutely ;-). For >= 9x5 boards (sama5, …), MEM 
target works and MEM+SLOW_CLOCK target does not work, MEM and 
MEM+SLOW_CLOCK merge breaks MEM target for those boards.

There is however a good news !, at91_pm_verify_clocks() used to be 
called for MEM target without considering if it was MEM (~STANDBY) or 
MEM+SLOW_CLOCK. It means that all MEM target users can with very good 
chance go to a deeper sleep state without issue because 
at91_pm_verify_clocks() successfully checked on those boards and is why 
we can merge MEM and MEM+SLOW_CLOCK without adding a regression.

Care should be taken to pull-request at the same time both the rework 
and the above cited following series about slow clock support for all 
known boards so we don't break MEM target for a release cycle.

> I would say that PM on 9x5, n12 and sama5 in mainline is clearly not 
> well tested and is lagging behind the atmel tree.

Well, at the current mainline state, everything works fine for me except 
slow clock mode, I thoroughly checked everything else.


  reply	other threads:[~2015-01-25 13:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-20  8:16 [PATCH 00/12] AT91 pm cleanup for 3.20 Wenyou Yang
2015-01-20  8:16 ` [PATCH 01/12] pm: at91: pm_slowclock: improve reliability of suspend/resume Wenyou Yang
2015-01-20  8:16 ` [PATCH 02/12] pm: at91: Workaround DDRSDRC self-refresh bug with LPDDR1 memories Wenyou Yang
2015-01-20  8:16 ` [PATCH 03/12] pm: at91: pm_slowclock: remove the unused code related with SLOWDOWN_MASTER_CLOCK Wenyou Yang
2015-01-20  8:16 ` [PATCH 04/12] pm: at91: move the copying the sram function to the sram initializationi phase Wenyou Yang
2015-01-20  8:16 ` [PATCH 05/12] ARM: at91: move select SRAM to ARCH_AT91 Wenyou Yang
2015-01-23 10:24   ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-26  1:10     ` Yang, Wenyou
2015-01-20  8:16 ` [PATCH 06/12] pm: at91: remove the config item CONFIG_AT91_SLOW_CLOCK Wenyou Yang
2015-01-20  8:17 ` [PATCH 07/12] pm: at91: the standby mode uses the same sram function as the suspend to memory mode Wenyou Yang
2015-01-23 10:30   ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-23 16:50   ` Sylvain Rochet
2015-01-23 23:13     ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-27  3:08       ` Yang, Wenyou
2015-01-23 17:32   ` Sylvain Rochet
2015-01-23 23:02     ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-26  3:08       ` Yang, Wenyou
2015-01-26  3:06     ` Yang, Wenyou
2015-01-20  8:17 ` [PATCH 08/12] pm: at91: rename file name: pm_slowclock.S -->pm_suspend.S Wenyou Yang
2015-01-23 19:17   ` Sylvain Rochet
2015-01-23 23:17     ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-25 13:30       ` Sylvain Rochet [this message]
2015-01-26  1:25     ` Yang, Wenyou
2015-01-20  8:17 ` [PATCH 09/12] pm: at91: rename function name: at91_slow_clock()-->at91_pm_suspend_sram_fn Wenyou Yang
2015-01-20  8:24 ` Wenyou Yang
2015-01-20  8:24 ` [PATCH 10/12] pm: at91: remove the at91_xxx_standby() function definitions in the pm.h Wenyou Yang
2015-01-20  8:25 ` [PATCH 11/12] pm: at91: remove the struct ramc_ids .data at91_xxx_standby members Wenyou Yang
2015-01-20  8:26 ` [PATCH 12/12] pm: at91: amend the pm_suspend entry for at91_cpuidle_device Wenyou Yang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH 08/12] pm: at91: rename file name: pm_slowclock.S -->pm_suspend.S' \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).