LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sylvain Rochet <sylvain.rochet@finsecur.com>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Wenyou Yang <wenyou.yang@atmel.com>,
nicolas.ferre@atmel.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peda@axentia.se,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/12] pm: at91: rename file name: pm_slowclock.S -->pm_suspend.S
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 14:30:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150125133024.GA27125@gradator.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150123231738.GB32318@piout.net>
Hello Alexandre,
On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 12:17:38AM +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
>
> This is a rework, what is part of linux-3.10-at91 and not yet present in
> mainline should be part of a following series. I would prefer not mixing
> reworks and "new" functionalities (they have been present in the atmel
> tree for a while but never mainlined).
I agree, I just didn't know a new series will follow, maybe I missed
this point.
Maybe I am a bit too picky (or boring: if I am, please told me), but
this series by itself adds regression to all users of >= 9x5 boards
(sama5, …) because it merges MEM target and MEM+SLOW_CLOCK target, which
used to be too different target states, not selectable at runtime indeed
but this is still in practice two different target states. Note that I
am not saying that MEM target and MEM+SLOW_CLOCK target should not be
merged, they should, absolutely ;-). For >= 9x5 boards (sama5, …), MEM
target works and MEM+SLOW_CLOCK target does not work, MEM and
MEM+SLOW_CLOCK merge breaks MEM target for those boards.
There is however a good news !, at91_pm_verify_clocks() used to be
called for MEM target without considering if it was MEM (~STANDBY) or
MEM+SLOW_CLOCK. It means that all MEM target users can with very good
chance go to a deeper sleep state without issue because
at91_pm_verify_clocks() successfully checked on those boards and is why
we can merge MEM and MEM+SLOW_CLOCK without adding a regression.
Care should be taken to pull-request at the same time both the rework
and the above cited following series about slow clock support for all
known boards so we don't break MEM target for a release cycle.
> I would say that PM on 9x5, n12 and sama5 in mainline is clearly not
> well tested and is lagging behind the atmel tree.
Well, at the current mainline state, everything works fine for me except
slow clock mode, I thoroughly checked everything else.
Sylvain
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-25 13:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-20 8:16 [PATCH 00/12] AT91 pm cleanup for 3.20 Wenyou Yang
2015-01-20 8:16 ` [PATCH 01/12] pm: at91: pm_slowclock: improve reliability of suspend/resume Wenyou Yang
2015-01-20 8:16 ` [PATCH 02/12] pm: at91: Workaround DDRSDRC self-refresh bug with LPDDR1 memories Wenyou Yang
2015-01-20 8:16 ` [PATCH 03/12] pm: at91: pm_slowclock: remove the unused code related with SLOWDOWN_MASTER_CLOCK Wenyou Yang
2015-01-20 8:16 ` [PATCH 04/12] pm: at91: move the copying the sram function to the sram initializationi phase Wenyou Yang
2015-01-20 8:16 ` [PATCH 05/12] ARM: at91: move select SRAM to ARCH_AT91 Wenyou Yang
2015-01-23 10:24 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-26 1:10 ` Yang, Wenyou
2015-01-20 8:16 ` [PATCH 06/12] pm: at91: remove the config item CONFIG_AT91_SLOW_CLOCK Wenyou Yang
2015-01-20 8:17 ` [PATCH 07/12] pm: at91: the standby mode uses the same sram function as the suspend to memory mode Wenyou Yang
2015-01-23 10:30 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-23 16:50 ` Sylvain Rochet
2015-01-23 23:13 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-27 3:08 ` Yang, Wenyou
2015-01-23 17:32 ` Sylvain Rochet
2015-01-23 23:02 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-26 3:08 ` Yang, Wenyou
2015-01-26 3:06 ` Yang, Wenyou
2015-01-20 8:17 ` [PATCH 08/12] pm: at91: rename file name: pm_slowclock.S -->pm_suspend.S Wenyou Yang
2015-01-23 19:17 ` Sylvain Rochet
2015-01-23 23:17 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-25 13:30 ` Sylvain Rochet [this message]
2015-01-26 1:25 ` Yang, Wenyou
2015-01-20 8:17 ` [PATCH 09/12] pm: at91: rename function name: at91_slow_clock()-->at91_pm_suspend_sram_fn Wenyou Yang
2015-01-20 8:24 ` Wenyou Yang
2015-01-20 8:24 ` [PATCH 10/12] pm: at91: remove the at91_xxx_standby() function definitions in the pm.h Wenyou Yang
2015-01-20 8:25 ` [PATCH 11/12] pm: at91: remove the struct ramc_ids .data at91_xxx_standby members Wenyou Yang
2015-01-20 8:26 ` [PATCH 12/12] pm: at91: amend the pm_suspend entry for at91_cpuidle_device Wenyou Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150125133024.GA27125@gradator.net \
--to=sylvain.rochet@finsecur.com \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
--cc=peda@axentia.se \
--cc=wenyou.yang@atmel.com \
--subject='Re: [PATCH 08/12] pm: at91: rename file name: pm_slowclock.S -->pm_suspend.S' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).