LKML Archive on
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jean Delvare <>
To: Ulf Hansson <>
Cc: Chris Ball <>,
	linux-mmc <>,,
	Andrew Morton <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: Add hardware dependencies for sdhci-pxav3 and sdhci-pxav2
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 09:29:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150130092913.6256e517@endymion.delvare> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

Hi Ulf,

On Thu, 29 Jan 2015 16:01:48 +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 29 January 2015 at 15:17, Jean Delvare <> wrote:
> > On Wed, 28 Jan 2015 15:04:24 +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> >> For those SOC that want these drivers, they should be able to select
> >> them from their defconfigs. So it will be an opt-in instead of opt-out
> >> policy, which I prefer. It also follows the other Kconfig options for
> >> mmc drivers.
> >
> > As you wish. But that change would be a separate patch going on top of
> > mine, right? I'm not sure I understand what you expect from me at this
> > point, please clarify.
> Sorry for being unclear. I don't like $subject patch.
> Send a new one, removing the following lines:
> default CPU_MMP2
> default CPU_PXA910
> Then you send another patch(es) to the respective SOC maintainer,
> updating the defonfig(s) selecting MMC_SDHCI_PXAV3|PXAV2, when
> appropriate.
> Would that work?

Not really, I'm afraid.

My proposed change affects users of non-embedded systems, or more
generally everyone not on ARCH_MMP. I want to make their life easier by
hiding options which are not relevant to them. I have sent several
dozen of such patches in the past for various drivers, see for example
the latest ones:
Also note that the MMC subsystem already has examples of this, check
drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig. I'm just doing more of the same, nothing new.

The change you want, OTOH, would affect exclusively the ARCH_MMP users
(of which I am not.) It is essentially unrelated with what I was
originally talking about, except for the fact that it touches the same
Kconfig entries. I have no idea if your proposal is a good idea, I am
not dealing with embedded systems, and I have no idea who are the
maintainers of the affected SOCs. This is simply not my area.

So basically you are rejecting my proposal without a reason, and then
you ask me to do an unrelated work instead. This is not fair, sorry.

Don't get me wrong, I'm always ready to do some more work than I
originally intended if that's what it takes to get my patches merged. I
value code review and I welcome constructive criticism. But this time
your request is not reasonable.

Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support

  reply	other threads:[~2015-01-30  8:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-26 10:23 Jean Delvare
2015-01-27 14:06 ` Ulf Hansson
2015-01-27 14:34   ` Jean Delvare
2015-01-28 14:04     ` Ulf Hansson
2015-01-29 14:17       ` Jean Delvare
2015-01-29 15:01         ` Ulf Hansson
2015-01-30  8:29           ` Jean Delvare [this message]
2015-01-30 10:43             ` Ulf Hansson
2015-01-30 12:00               ` Jean Delvare

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150130092913.6256e517@endymion.delvare \ \ \ \ \ \ \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH] mmc: Add hardware dependencies for sdhci-pxav3 and sdhci-pxav2' \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).