LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ulrich Obergfell <uobergfe@redhat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] watchdog: implement error handling for failure to set up hardware perf events
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 13:17:34 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150223131734.61ee63b5f4064e656f0da762@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1423168825-156238-7-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com>
On Thu, 5 Feb 2015 15:40:22 -0500 Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> wrote:
> From: Ulrich Obergfell <uobergfe@redhat.com>
>
> If watchdog_nmi_enable() fails to set up the hardware perf event
> of one CPU, the entire hard lockup detector is deemed unreliable.
> Hence, disable the hard lockup detector and shut down the hardware
> perf events on all CPUs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ulrich Obergfell <uobergfe@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
> ---
> kernel/watchdog.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/watchdog.c b/kernel/watchdog.c
> index 26002ed..7ad8949 100644
> --- a/kernel/watchdog.c
> +++ b/kernel/watchdog.c
> @@ -502,6 +502,15 @@ static void watchdog(unsigned int cpu)
> __this_cpu_write(soft_lockup_hrtimer_cnt,
> __this_cpu_read(hrtimer_interrupts));
> __touch_watchdog();
> +
> + /*
> + * watchdog_nmi_enable() clears the NMI_WATCHDOG_ENABLED bit in the
> + * failure path. Check for failures that can occur asynchronously -
> + * for example, when CPUs are on-lined - and shut down the hardware
> + * perf event on each CPU accordingly.
> + */
> + if (!(watchdog_enabled & NMI_WATCHDOG_ENABLED))
> + watchdog_nmi_disable(cpu);
Silently disabling the hardware watchdog. Wouldn't it be better to
emit a printk to alert the operator about this event?
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR
> @@ -552,6 +561,15 @@ handle_err:
> goto out_save;
> }
>
> + /*
> + * Disable the hard lockup detector if _any_ CPU fails to set up
> + * set up the hardware perf event. The watchdog() function checks
> + * the NMI_WATCHDOG_ENABLED bit periodically.
> + */
> + smp_mb__before_atomic();
> + clear_bit(NMI_WATCHDOG_ENABLED_BIT, &watchdog_enabled);
> + smp_mb__after_atomic();
Please send along a patch which adds comments explaining what these
barriers are for.
What are these barriers for? ;)
> /* skip displaying the same error again */
> if (cpu > 0 && (PTR_ERR(event) == cpu0_err))
> return PTR_ERR(event);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-23 21:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-05 20:40 [PATCH 0/9] watchdog: internally split softlockup and hardlockup Don Zickus
2015-02-05 20:40 ` [PATCH 1/9] watchdog: new definitions and variables, initialization Don Zickus
2015-02-05 20:40 ` [PATCH 2/9] watchdog: introduce the proc_watchdog_update() function Don Zickus
2015-02-05 20:40 ` [PATCH 3/9] watchdog: move definition of 'watchdog_proc_mutex' outside of proc_dowatchdog() Don Zickus
2015-02-05 20:40 ` [PATCH 4/9] watchdog: introduce the proc_watchdog_common() function Don Zickus
2015-02-05 20:40 ` [PATCH 5/9] watchdog: introduce separate handlers for parameters in /proc/sys/kernel Don Zickus
2015-02-05 20:40 ` [PATCH 6/9] watchdog: implement error handling for failure to set up hardware perf events Don Zickus
2015-02-23 21:17 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2015-02-24 15:39 ` Don Zickus
2015-03-02 19:06 ` Don Zickus
2015-02-05 20:40 ` [PATCH 7/9] watchdog: enable the new user interface of the watchdog mechanism Don Zickus
2015-02-23 21:19 ` Andrew Morton
2015-02-24 15:46 ` Don Zickus
2015-03-02 19:05 ` [PATCH 7/9 UPDATE] " Don Zickus
2015-02-05 20:40 ` [PATCH 8/9] watchdog: clean up some function names and arguments Don Zickus
2015-02-05 20:40 ` [PATCH 9/9] watchdog: introduce the hardlockup_detector_disable() function Don Zickus
2015-02-05 23:22 ` [PATCH 0/9] watchdog: internally split softlockup and hardlockup Andrew Morton
2015-02-06 14:12 ` Don Zickus
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-11-04 16:20 Don Zickus
2014-11-04 16:20 ` [PATCH 6/9] watchdog: implement error handling for failure to set up hardware perf events Don Zickus
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150223131734.61ee63b5f4064e656f0da762@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=uobergfe@redhat.com \
--subject='Re: [PATCH 6/9] watchdog: implement error handling for failure to set up hardware perf events' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).