LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@kernel.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Clark Williams" <williams@redhat.com>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
"Mike Galbraith" <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Jörn Engel" <joern@purestorage.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v2] sched/rt: Use IPI to trigger RT task push migration instead of pulling
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 13:45:32 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150224134532.1c7c5060@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150224133946.3948c4b7@gandalf.local.home>
On Tue, 24 Feb 2015 13:39:46 -0500
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> +static void tell_cpu_to_push(int cpu, struct rq *rq, int prio)
> +{
> + /* We should never be here if the IPI is already out. */
> + BUG_ON(rq->rt.push_csd_pending);
> +
> + rq->rt.push_csd_pending = 1;
> + rq->rt.push_csd_cpu = cpu;
> + /* Save the prio that we used to find this CPU */
> + rq->rt.push_csd_prio = prio;
> +
> + /* Make sure csd_cpu is visible before we send the ipi */
> + smp_mb();
> +
> + smp_call_function_single_async(cpu, &rq->rt.push_csd);
> +}
> + rt_rq->push_csd_cpu = next_cpu;
> + rt_rq->push_csd_prio = next_prio;
> +
> + /* Make sure the next cpu is seen on remote CPU */
> + smp_mb();
BTW, would a smp_wmb() be enough here. I was a little paranoid about
the irq work and smp_call_functon above some how leaking before the
barrier. I'm probably just being too paranoid, and these can be
switched to smp_wmb(). But for now I'll just keep being a freak.
-- Steve
> +
> + irq_work_queue_on(&rt_rq->push_csd_work, next_cpu);
> +
> + return;
> +
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-24 18:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-24 18:39 Steven Rostedt
2015-02-24 18:45 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2015-02-24 21:23 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-02-25 10:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-25 15:51 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-02-25 17:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-25 17:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-25 17:50 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-02-26 7:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-26 12:43 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-02-26 13:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-26 14:00 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-02-26 7:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-26 12:46 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-02-25 7:56 Hillf Danton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150224134532.1c7c5060@gandalf.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=joern@purestorage.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
--cc=williams@redhat.com \
--subject='Re: [RFC][PATCH v2] sched/rt: Use IPI to trigger RT task push migration instead of pulling' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).