LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@kernel.org>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Clark Williams" <williams@redhat.com>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
"Mike Galbraith" <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Jörn Engel" <joern@purestorage.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v2] sched/rt: Use IPI to trigger RT task push migration instead of pulling
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 07:46:09 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150226074609.27ccd39d@grimm.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150226074907.GQ21418@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 08:49:07 +0100
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> Yes, notice that we don't start iterating at the beginning; this in on
> purpose. If we start iterating at the beginning, _every_ cpu will again
> pile up on the first one.
>
> By starting at the current cpu, each cpu will start iteration some place
> else and hopefully, with a big enough system, different CPUs end up on a
> different rto cpu.
Note, v3 doesn't start at the current CPU, it starts at the original
CPU again. As the start of every IPI comes from a different CPU, this
still keeps a restart from clobbering the same CPU.
-- Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-26 12:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-24 18:39 Steven Rostedt
2015-02-24 18:45 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-02-24 21:23 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-02-25 10:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-25 15:51 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-02-25 17:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-25 17:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-25 17:50 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-02-26 7:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-26 12:43 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-02-26 13:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-26 14:00 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-02-26 7:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-26 12:46 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2015-02-25 7:56 Hillf Danton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150226074609.27ccd39d@grimm.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=joern@purestorage.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
--cc=williams@redhat.com \
--subject='Re: [RFC][PATCH v2] sched/rt: Use IPI to trigger RT task push migration instead of pulling' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).