LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] staging: panel: return register value
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2015 19:05:59 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150309133559.GB13002@sudip-PC> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150309063007.GC6038@1wt.eu>
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 07:30:07AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 08, 2015 at 11:07:25PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> >
> > - if (parport_register_driver(&panel_driver)) {
> > - pr_err("could not register with parport. Aborting.\n");
> > - return -EIO;
> > - }
> > -
> > if (pprt)
> > pr_info("driver version " PANEL_VERSION
> > " registered on parport%d (io=0x%lx).\n", parport,
> > @@ -2375,7 +2370,7 @@ static int __init panel_init_module(void)
> > /* tells various subsystems about the fact that initialization
> > is finished */
> > init_in_progress = 0;
> > - return 0;
> > + return parport_register_driver(&panel_driver);
>
> Here I'd rather keep the error message, as it's quite annoying when a
> driver does not load and you don't know why, especially with something
> like parport where there are many possible causes. Something like this
> would be better in my opinion :
>
> - return 0;
> + err = parport_register_driver(&panel_driver);
> + if (err)
> + pr_err("could not register with parport. Aborting.\n");
> + return err;
>
> Well, I just found that currently parport_register_driver() always
> succeeds, but I still think it's better to verbosely handle errors.
ok, i will send a v2, but is the error message really required? considering the fact that parport_register_driver() always succeeds ..
regards
sudip
>
> Thanks,
> Willy
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-09 13:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-08 17:37 [PATCH 1/3] staging: panel: register reboot Sudip Mukherjee
2015-03-08 17:37 ` [PATCH 2/3] staging: panel: return register value Sudip Mukherjee
2015-03-09 6:30 ` Willy Tarreau
2015-03-09 13:35 ` Sudip Mukherjee [this message]
2015-03-09 15:05 ` Willy Tarreau
2015-03-08 17:37 ` [PATCH 3/3] staging: panel: remove initialization check Sudip Mukherjee
2015-03-09 6:20 ` Willy Tarreau
2015-03-09 6:19 ` [PATCH 1/3] staging: panel: register reboot Willy Tarreau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150309133559.GB13002@sudip-PC \
--to=sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=w@1wt.eu \
--subject='Re: [PATCH 2/3] staging: panel: return register value' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).