LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: "Li, Aubrey" <aubrey.li@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	"alan@linux.intel.com" <alan@linux.intel.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@linux.intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Len.Brown@intel.com, x86@kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Bypass legacy PIC and PIT on ACPI hardware reduced platform
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 09:06:28 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150310080628.GA20314@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54FE2C0B.10209@linux.intel.com>


* Li, Aubrey <aubrey.li@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> >>  - in x86_reduced_hw_init() set 'legacy_pic' to 'null_legacy_pic'
> >>
> >>  - clean up 'global_clock_event' handling: instead of a global 
> >>    variable, move its management into x86_platform_ops::get_clockevent()
> >>    and set the method to hpet/pit/abp/etc. specific handlers that
> >>    return the right clockevent device.
> >>
> >>  - in your x86_reduced_hw_init() function add the hpet clockevent
> >>    device to x86_platform_ops::get_clockevent, overriding the default
> >>    PIT.
> 
> how about this one?
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> index b9e30da..70955d6 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> @@ -1541,6 +1541,16 @@ int __init early_acpi_boot_init(void)
>  	 */
>  	early_acpi_process_madt();
> 
> +	/*
> +	 * Override x86_init functions and bypass legacy pic
> +	 * in hardware-reduced ACPI mode
> +	 */
> +	if (acpi_gbl_reduced_hardware) {
> +		x86_init.timers.timer_init = x86_init_noop;
> +		x86_init.irqs.pre_vector_init = x86_init_noop;
> +		legacy_pic = &null_legacy_pic;
> +	}

Sounds good to me, assuming it builds, boots and works! :-)

A couple of extra suggestions:

1)

I'd suggest moving it into its own dedicated, appropriately named 
static function, to make it clear that 'ACPI Reduced Hardware' init 
happens there.

2)

I'd also initialize it like this:

		x86_init.timers.timer_init	= x86_init_noop;
		x86_init.irqs.pre_vector_init	= x86_init_noop;
		legacy_pic			= &null_legacy_pic;

to make the noop patterns stand out better.

3)

Once all is said and done, please also make acpi_gbl_reduced_hardware 
a flag internal to the ACPI code, not exposed to and used by other 
bits of x86 code.

> If the above makes sense, I'll send poweroff and reboot change 
> together in a seperate patch.

Yeah, please send them in a single series though, so they form a 
logical group.

Thanks,

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2015-03-10  8:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-04  3:23 Li, Aubrey
2015-03-04  5:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-03-04  5:26   ` Li, Aubrey
2015-03-04  5:31     ` Ingo Molnar
2015-03-04  6:04       ` Li, Aubrey
2015-03-04  7:37         ` Ingo Molnar
2015-03-04  8:43           ` Arjan van de Ven
2015-03-04  9:50             ` Borislav Petkov
2015-03-04 14:16               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-04 14:05                 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-03-04 14:38                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-04 20:21                   ` Alan Cox
2015-03-04 21:52                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-05 11:26                       ` Li, Aubrey
2015-03-05 16:05                       ` Alan Cox
2015-03-04 14:36               ` Arjan van de Ven
2015-03-04 20:11                 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-03-05 11:13                   ` Li, Aubrey
2015-03-05 11:36                     ` Ingo Molnar
2015-03-05 12:42                       ` Li, Aubrey
2015-03-05 16:06                         ` Alan Cox
2015-03-09 23:26                         ` Li, Aubrey
2015-03-10  8:06                           ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2015-03-11  4:14                             ` Li, Aubrey
2015-03-04 20:18               ` Alan Cox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150310080628.GA20314@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=Len.Brown@intel.com \
    --cc=alan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=aubrey.li@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=hpa@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH] x86: Bypass legacy PIC and PIT on ACPI hardware reduced platform' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).