From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752926AbbCJUCW (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Mar 2015 16:02:22 -0400 Received: from mail-pa0-f46.google.com ([209.85.220.46]:42666 "EHLO mail-pa0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751563AbbCJUCT (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Mar 2015 16:02:19 -0400 Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 13:02:09 -0700 From: Brian Norris To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Nicolas Ferre , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com, Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard , Andrew Victor Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: at91: force CPU selection Message-ID: <20150310200209.GE4124@norris-Latitude-E6410> References: <1425970798-14015-1-git-send-email-computersforpeace@gmail.com> <2216832.iXiqHye8YX@wuerfel> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2216832.iXiqHye8YX@wuerfel> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 10:02:15AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > I actually added a bunch of these in other places, but have stopped > doing so because Russell didn't like them, and I tend to follow > his argument now that it's actually pretty confusing. I'm not a big fan of my patch, but it did at least solve the problem. Thanks for the info, and I'm happy to drop my patch. At least I've fixed my compile-test setups to avoid bad combinations, now. To be clear, multiplatform support is in progress, but not merged yet, right? Brian