LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
To: Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>
Cc: James Liao <jamesjj.liao@mediatek.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, kernel@pengutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] soc: Mediatek: Add SCPSYS power domain driver
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 08:21:54 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150312072154.GB24885@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7hbnjzxxqo.fsf@deeprootsystems.com>

On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 10:14:23AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> writes:
> 
> >> I asked our designer about the bus protection feature, here is his
> >> response:
> >> 
> >> "
> >> It's for unexpected signal glitch in Power switch process.
> >> 
> >> During Power switch process, we have clock switch, reset, isolation
> >> enable/disable and  power switch involved where the transition of
> >> asynchronous reset and  isolation is the most critical one,  which have
> >> risk to introduce a unexpected short period signal transition from
> >> MTCMOS’s interface to other alive HW . 
> >> "
> >> 
> >> That means it protects unexpected bus accessing from HW, not from SW. So
> >> it will not hide bugs from wrong SW access.
> >
> > Ok, thanks for clarifying. This means we should enable this feature
> > sooner or later. Since the audio driver which is likely the first user
> > of this driver doesn't need the protection bits I think we have some
> > time and can add the protection bits once the clock patches have been
> > merged.
> 
> Sounds OK to me.
> 
> But I still think it belongs in the infracfg layer, and not in the PM
> domain layer.

I already have plans how to put the code into the infracfg driver. Where
the code is going to be called from remains to be seen. The power domain
driver might or might not be a good place for it.

Sascha

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

  reply	other threads:[~2015-03-12  7:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-09  8:09 [RFC] Mediatek SCPSYS power domain support Sascha Hauer
2015-03-09  8:10 ` [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: soc: Add documentation for the MediaTek SCPSYS unit Sascha Hauer
2015-03-09 20:46   ` Kevin Hilman
2015-03-10  8:02     ` Sascha Hauer
2015-03-09  8:10 ` [PATCH 2/4] soc: Mediatek: Add SCPSYS power domain driver Sascha Hauer
2015-03-09 21:35   ` Kevin Hilman
2015-03-10  9:41     ` Sascha Hauer
2015-03-10 14:40       ` Sascha Hauer
2015-03-10 16:00         ` Kevin Hilman
2015-03-11  3:16       ` James Liao
2015-03-11  9:03         ` Sascha Hauer
2015-03-11 17:14           ` Kevin Hilman
2015-03-12  7:21             ` Sascha Hauer [this message]
2015-03-09  8:10 ` [PATCH 3/4] ARM64: MediaTek: Add generic pm domain support Sascha Hauer
2015-03-09  8:10 ` [PATCH 4/4] ARM64: MediaTek MT8173: Add SCPSYS device node Sascha Hauer
2015-03-09 20:43 ` [RFC] Mediatek SCPSYS power domain support Kevin Hilman
2015-03-10 15:40 [PATCH v1] " Sascha Hauer
2015-03-10 15:41 ` [PATCH 2/4] soc: Mediatek: Add SCPSYS power domain driver Sascha Hauer
2015-03-11 11:10   ` Paul Bolle
2015-03-31 16:27   ` Kevin Hilman
2015-04-13 10:55     ` Sascha Hauer
2015-05-08 12:16   ` Matthias Brugger
2015-05-08 12:19     ` Sascha Hauer
2015-05-08 12:28       ` Matthias Brugger
2015-05-08 12:51         ` Sascha Hauer
2015-05-08 15:51           ` Matthias Brugger
2015-05-11 13:11 [PATCH v2] Mediatek SCPSYS power domain support Sascha Hauer
2015-05-11 13:11 ` [PATCH 2/4] soc: Mediatek: Add SCPSYS power domain driver Sascha Hauer
2015-05-26 22:35   ` Kevin Hilman
2015-05-27  6:24     ` Sascha Hauer
2015-05-28 17:22       ` Kevin Hilman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150312072154.GB24885@pengutronix.de \
    --to=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jamesjj.liao@mediatek.com \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=khilman@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH 2/4] soc: Mediatek: Add SCPSYS power domain driver' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).