LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@savoirfairelinux.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] sysfs: Use only return value from is_visible for the file mode
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 11:00:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150312100018.GB3682@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1426098131-20106-2-git-send-email-vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com>
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 02:22:09PM -0400, Vivien Didelot wrote:
> From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
>
> Up to now, is_visible can only be used to either remove visibility
> of a file entirely or to add permissions, but not to reduce permissions.
> This makes it impossible, for example, to use DEVICE_ATTR_RW to define
> file attributes and reduce permissions to read-only.
>
> This behavior is undesirable and unnecessarily complicates code which
> needs to reduce permissions; instead of just returning the desired
> permissions, it has to ensure that the permissions in the attribute
> variable declaration only reflect the minimal permissions ever needed.
>
> Change semantics of is_visible to only use the permissions returned
> from it instead of oring the returned value with the hard-coded
> permissions.
>
> Cc: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com>
> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> ---
> fs/sysfs/group.c | 5 ++---
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Why have you not signed off on this patch if you sent it to me? Don't
you agree with it?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-12 10:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-11 18:22 [PATCH v2 0/3] sysfs: Refine is_visible API Vivien Didelot
2015-03-11 18:22 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] sysfs: Use only return value from is_visible for the file mode Vivien Didelot
2015-03-12 10:00 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2015-03-11 18:22 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] sysfs: Only accept read/write permissions for file attributes Vivien Didelot
2015-03-12 1:33 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-03-12 10:01 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2015-03-12 10:39 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-03-12 13:43 ` Vivien Didelot
2015-03-12 13:49 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2015-03-11 18:22 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] sysfs: Document struct attribute_group Vivien Didelot
2015-03-12 10:00 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150312100018.GB3682@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kernel@savoirfairelinux.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com \
--subject='Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] sysfs: Use only return value from is_visible for the file mode' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).