LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> To: mhocko@suse.cz Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, david@fromorbit.com, mgorman@suse.de, riel@redhat.com, fengguang.wu@intel.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: Allow small allocations to fail Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 22:06:54 +0900 [thread overview] Message-ID: <201503152206.AGJ22930.HOStFFFQLVMOOJ@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20150315121317.GA30685@dhcp22.suse.cz> Michal Hocko wrote: > On Sun 15-03-15 14:43:37, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > [...] > > If you want to count only those retries which involved OOM killer, you need > > to do like > > > > - nr_retries++; > > + if (gfp_mask & __GFP_FS) > > + nr_retries++; > > > > in this patch. > > No, we shouldn't create another type of hidden NOFAIL allocation like > this. I understand that the wording of the changelog might be confusing, > though. > > It says: "This implementation counts only those retries which involved > OOM killer because we do not want to be too eager to fail the request." > > Would it be more clear if I changed that to? > "This implemetnation counts only those retries when the system is > considered OOM because all previous reclaim attempts have resulted > in no progress because we do not want to be too eager to fail the > request." > > We definitely _want_ to fail GFP_NOFS allocations. I see. The updated changelog is much more clear. > -- > Michal Hocko > SUSE Labs >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-15 13:07 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2015-03-11 20:54 [PATCH 0/2] Move away from non-failing small allocations Michal Hocko 2015-03-11 20:54 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm: Allow small allocations to fail Michal Hocko 2015-03-12 12:54 ` Tetsuo Handa 2015-03-12 13:12 ` Michal Hocko 2015-03-15 5:43 ` Tetsuo Handa 2015-03-15 12:13 ` Michal Hocko 2015-03-15 13:06 ` Tetsuo Handa [this message] 2015-03-16 7:46 ` [PATCH 1/2 v2] " Michal Hocko 2015-03-16 21:11 ` Johannes Weiner 2015-03-17 10:25 ` Michal Hocko 2015-03-17 13:29 ` Johannes Weiner 2015-03-17 14:17 ` Michal Hocko 2015-03-17 17:26 ` Johannes Weiner 2015-03-17 19:41 ` Michal Hocko 2015-03-18 9:10 ` Vlastimil Babka 2015-03-18 12:04 ` Michal Hocko 2015-03-18 12:36 ` Tetsuo Handa 2015-03-18 11:35 ` Tetsuo Handa 2015-03-17 11:13 ` Tetsuo Handa 2015-03-17 13:15 ` Michal Hocko 2015-03-18 11:33 ` Tetsuo Handa 2015-03-18 12:23 ` Michal Hocko 2015-03-19 11:03 ` Tetsuo Handa 2015-03-11 20:54 ` [PATCH 2/2] mmotm: Enable small allocation " Michal Hocko 2015-03-11 22:36 ` [PATCH 0/2] Move away from non-failing small allocations Sasha Levin 2015-03-16 22:38 ` Andrew Morton 2015-03-17 9:07 ` Michal Hocko 2015-03-17 14:06 ` Tetsuo Handa 2015-04-02 11:53 ` Tetsuo Handa
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=201503152206.AGJ22930.HOStFFFQLVMOOJ@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \ --to=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \ --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \ --cc=david@fromorbit.com \ --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \ --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \ --cc=mgorman@suse.de \ --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \ --cc=riel@redhat.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).