Re: [PATCH 7/9] writeback: periodically trim the writeback list

[Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>]

On Tue 10-03-15 15:45:22, Josef Bacik wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> 
> Inodes are removed lazily from the bdi writeback list, so in the
> absence of sync(2) work inodes will build up on the bdi writback
> list even though they are no longer under IO. Use the periodic
> kupdate work check to remove inodes no longer under IO from the
> writeback list.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
  Looks good. You can add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>

								Honza

> ---
>  fs/fs-writeback.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
> index 82b0f43..aa0de0f 100644
> --- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
> +++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
> @@ -1037,6 +1037,23 @@ static long wb_check_background_flush(struct bdi_writeback *wb)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * clean out writeback list for all inodes that don't have IO in progress
> + */
> +static void wb_trim_writeback_list(struct bdi_writeback *wb)
> +{
> +	struct inode *inode;
> +	struct inode *tmp;
> +
> +	spin_lock(&wb->list_lock);
> +	list_for_each_entry_safe(inode, tmp, &wb->b_writeback, i_wb_list) {
> +		if (!mapping_tagged(inode->i_mapping, PAGECACHE_TAG_WRITEBACK))
> +			list_del_init(&inode->i_wb_list);
> +	}
> +	spin_unlock(&wb->list_lock);
> +
> +}
> +
>  static long wb_check_old_data_flush(struct bdi_writeback *wb)
>  {
>  	unsigned long expired;
> @@ -1053,6 +1070,8 @@ static long wb_check_old_data_flush(struct bdi_writeback *wb)
>  	if (time_before(jiffies, expired))
>  		return 0;
>  
> +	wb_trim_writeback_list(wb);
> +
>  	wb->last_old_flush = jiffies;
>  	nr_pages = get_nr_dirty_pages();
>  
> -- 
> 1.9.3
> 
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR