LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> To: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Cc: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, will.deacon@arm.com, Bob Liu <liubo95@huawei.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>, Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru>, Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] mm, oom_reaper: gather each vma to prevent leaking TLB entry Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 11:15:29 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20171110101529.op6yaxtdke2p4bsh@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20171110001933.GA12421@bbox> On Fri 10-11-17 09:19:33, Minchan Kim wrote: > On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 09:54:53AM +0000, Wang Nan wrote: > > tlb_gather_mmu(&tlb, mm, 0, -1) means gathering the whole virtual memory > > space. In this case, tlb->fullmm is true. Some archs like arm64 doesn't > > flush TLB when tlb->fullmm is true: > > > > commit 5a7862e83000 ("arm64: tlbflush: avoid flushing when fullmm == 1"). > > > > Which makes leaking of tlb entries. > > That means soft-dirty which has used tlb_gather_mmu with fullmm could be > broken via losing write-protection bit once it supports arm64 in future? > > If so, it would be better to use TASK_SIZE rather than -1 in tlb_gather_mmu. > Of course, it's a off-topic. I wouldn't play tricks like that. And maybe the API itself could be more explicit. E.g. add a lazy parameter which would allow arch specific code to not flush if it is sure that nobody can actually stumble over missed flush. E.g. the following? diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/tlb.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/tlb.h index d5562f9ce600..fe9042aee8e9 100644 --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/tlb.h +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/tlb.h @@ -149,7 +149,8 @@ static inline void tlb_flush_mmu(struct mmu_gather *tlb) static inline void arch_tlb_gather_mmu(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct mm_struct *mm, - unsigned long start, unsigned long end) + unsigned long start, unsigned long end, + bool lazy) { tlb->mm = mm; tlb->fullmm = !(start | (end+1)); diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlb.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlb.h index ffdaea7954bb..7adde19b2bcc 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlb.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlb.h @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ static inline void tlb_flush(struct mmu_gather *tlb) * The ASID allocator will either invalidate the ASID or mark * it as used. */ - if (tlb->fullmm) + if (tlb->lazy) return; /* diff --git a/arch/ia64/include/asm/tlb.h b/arch/ia64/include/asm/tlb.h index cbe5ac3699bf..50c440f5b7bc 100644 --- a/arch/ia64/include/asm/tlb.h +++ b/arch/ia64/include/asm/tlb.h @@ -169,7 +169,8 @@ static inline void __tlb_alloc_page(struct mmu_gather *tlb) static inline void arch_tlb_gather_mmu(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct mm_struct *mm, - unsigned long start, unsigned long end) + unsigned long start, unsigned long end, + bool lazy) { tlb->mm = mm; tlb->max = ARRAY_SIZE(tlb->local); diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/tlb.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/tlb.h index 2eb8ff0d6fca..2310657b64c4 100644 --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/tlb.h +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/tlb.h @@ -49,7 +49,8 @@ extern void tlb_remove_table(struct mmu_gather *tlb, void *table); static inline void arch_tlb_gather_mmu(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct mm_struct *mm, - unsigned long start, unsigned long end) + unsigned long start, unsigned long end, + bool lazy) { tlb->mm = mm; tlb->start = start; diff --git a/arch/sh/include/asm/tlb.h b/arch/sh/include/asm/tlb.h index 51a8bc967e75..ae4c50a7c1ec 100644 --- a/arch/sh/include/asm/tlb.h +++ b/arch/sh/include/asm/tlb.h @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ static inline void init_tlb_gather(struct mmu_gather *tlb) static inline void arch_tlb_gather_mmu(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct mm_struct *mm, - unsigned long start, unsigned long end) + unsigned long start, unsigned long end, bool lazy) { tlb->mm = mm; tlb->start = start; diff --git a/arch/um/include/asm/tlb.h b/arch/um/include/asm/tlb.h index 344d95619d03..f24af66d07a4 100644 --- a/arch/um/include/asm/tlb.h +++ b/arch/um/include/asm/tlb.h @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ static inline void init_tlb_gather(struct mmu_gather *tlb) static inline void arch_tlb_gather_mmu(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct mm_struct *mm, - unsigned long start, unsigned long end) + unsigned long start, unsigned long end, bool lazy) { tlb->mm = mm; tlb->start = start; diff --git a/include/asm-generic/tlb.h b/include/asm-generic/tlb.h index faddde44de8c..c312fcd5a953 100644 --- a/include/asm-generic/tlb.h +++ b/include/asm-generic/tlb.h @@ -102,6 +102,7 @@ struct mmu_gather { /* we have performed an operation which * requires a complete flush of the tlb */ need_flush_all : 1; + lazy : 1; struct mmu_gather_batch *active; struct mmu_gather_batch local; @@ -113,7 +114,8 @@ struct mmu_gather { #define HAVE_GENERIC_MMU_GATHER void arch_tlb_gather_mmu(struct mmu_gather *tlb, - struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long start, unsigned long end); + struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long start, unsigned long end, + bool lazy); void tlb_flush_mmu(struct mmu_gather *tlb); void arch_tlb_finish_mmu(struct mmu_gather *tlb, unsigned long start, unsigned long end, bool force); diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c index 590709e84a43..7dfdd4d8224f 100644 --- a/mm/memory.c +++ b/mm/memory.c @@ -218,13 +218,15 @@ static bool tlb_next_batch(struct mmu_gather *tlb) } void arch_tlb_gather_mmu(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct mm_struct *mm, - unsigned long start, unsigned long end) + unsigned long start, unsigned long end, + bool lazy) { tlb->mm = mm; /* Is it from 0 to ~0? */ tlb->fullmm = !(start | (end+1)); tlb->need_flush_all = 0; + tlb->lazy = lazy; tlb->local.next = NULL; tlb->local.nr = 0; tlb->local.max = ARRAY_SIZE(tlb->__pages); @@ -408,7 +410,18 @@ void tlb_remove_table(struct mmu_gather *tlb, void *table) void tlb_gather_mmu(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long start, unsigned long end) { - arch_tlb_gather_mmu(tlb, mm, start, end); + arch_tlb_gather_mmu(tlb, mm, start, end, false); + inc_tlb_flush_pending(tlb->mm); +} + +/* tlb_gather_mmu_lazy + * Basically same as tlb_gather_mmu except it allows architectures to + * skip tlb flushing if they can ensure that nobody will reuse tlb entries + */ +void tlb_gather_mmu_lazy(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct mm_struct *mm, + unsigned long start, unsigned long end) +{ + arch_tlb_gather_mmu(tlb, mm, start, end, true); inc_tlb_flush_pending(tlb->mm); } diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c index 680506faceae..43594a6a2eac 100644 --- a/mm/mmap.c +++ b/mm/mmap.c @@ -2997,7 +2997,7 @@ void exit_mmap(struct mm_struct *mm) lru_add_drain(); flush_cache_mm(mm); - tlb_gather_mmu(&tlb, mm, 0, -1); + tlb_gather_mmu_lazy(&tlb, mm, 0, -1); /* update_hiwater_rss(mm) here? but nobody should be looking */ /* Use -1 here to ensure all VMAs in the mm are unmapped */ unmap_vmas(&tlb, vma, 0, -1); > However, I want to add a big fat comment in tlb_gather_mmu to warn "TLB > flushing with (0, -1) can be skipped on some architectures" so upcoming > users can care of. Yes, this would be really useful if the api is not explicit. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-10 10:15 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2017-11-07 9:54 [RESEND PATCH] mm, oom_reaper: gather each vma to prevent leaking TLB entry Wang Nan 2017-11-07 10:09 ` Michal Hocko 2017-11-10 0:19 ` Minchan Kim 2017-11-10 10:15 ` Michal Hocko [this message] 2017-11-10 12:26 ` [PATCH] arch, mm: introduce arch_tlb_gather_mmu_lazy (was: Re: [RESEND PATCH] mm, oom_reaper: gather each vma to prevent) " Michal Hocko 2017-11-13 0:28 ` Minchan Kim 2017-11-13 9:51 ` Michal Hocko 2017-11-14 1:45 ` Minchan Kim 2017-11-14 7:21 ` Michal Hocko 2017-11-15 0:12 ` Minchan Kim 2017-11-15 8:14 ` Michal Hocko 2017-11-16 0:44 ` Minchan Kim 2017-11-16 9:19 ` Michal Hocko 2017-11-15 17:33 ` Will Deacon 2017-11-16 9:20 ` Michal Hocko 2017-11-20 14:24 ` Will Deacon 2017-11-20 16:04 ` [PATCH] arch, mm: introduce arch_tlb_gather_mmu_lazy Michal Hocko 2017-11-22 19:30 ` Will Deacon 2017-11-23 6:18 ` Minchan Kim
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20171110101529.op6yaxtdke2p4bsh@dhcp22.suse.cz \ --to=mhocko@kernel.org \ --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \ --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \ --cc=guro@fb.com \ --cc=khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \ --cc=liubo95@huawei.com \ --cc=minchan@kernel.org \ --cc=mingo@kernel.org \ --cc=rientjes@google.com \ --cc=wangnan0@huawei.com \ --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).