LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
	Andrea Argangeli <andrea@kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] arch, mm: introduce arch_tlb_gather_mmu_exit
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 08:22:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171129072211.vbjauoqyaj7hcfel@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171128190001.GD8187@arm.com>

On Tue 28-11-17 19:00:01, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 10:02:36AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> > 
> > 5a7862e83000 ("arm64: tlbflush: avoid flushing when fullmm == 1") has
> > introduced an optimization to not flush tlb when we are tearing the
> > whole address space down. Will goes on to explain
> > 
> > : Basically, we tag each address space with an ASID (PCID on x86) which
> > : is resident in the TLB. This means we can elide TLB invalidation when
> > : pulling down a full mm because we won't ever assign that ASID to
> > : another mm without doing TLB invalidation elsewhere (which actually
> > : just nukes the whole TLB).
> > 
> > This all is nice but tlb_gather users are not aware of that and this can
> > actually cause some real problems. E.g. the oom_reaper tries to reap the
> > whole address space but it might race with threads accessing the memory [1].
> > It is possible that soft-dirty handling might suffer from the same
> > problem [2] as soon as it starts supporting the feature.
> > 
> > Introduce an explicit exit variant tlb_gather_mmu_exit which allows the
> > behavior arm64 implements for the fullmm case and replace it by an
> > explicit exit flag in the mmu_gather structure. exit_mmap path is then
> > turned into the explicit exit variant. Other architectures simply ignore
> > the flag.
> > 
> > [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171106033651.172368-1-wangnan0@huawei.com
> > [2] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171110001933.GA12421@bbox
> > Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> > ---
> > Hi,
> > I am sending this as an RFC because I am not fully familiar with the tlb
> > gather arch implications, espacially the semantic of fullmm. Therefore
> > I might duplicate some of its functionality. I hope people on the CC
> > list will help me to sort this out.
> > 
> > Comments? Objections?
> 
> I can't think of a case where we'd have exit set but not be doing the
> fullmm, in which case I'd be inclined to remove the last two parameters
> from tlb_gather_mmu_exit.

Makes sense. Will do!

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

      reply	other threads:[~2017-11-29  7:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-23  9:02 [RFC PATCH] arch, mm: introduce arch_tlb_gather_mmu_exit Michal Hocko
2017-11-28 19:00 ` Will Deacon
2017-11-29  7:22   ` Michal Hocko [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171129072211.vbjauoqyaj7hcfel@dhcp22.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andrea@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).