LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Liran Alon <liran.alon@oracle.com>,
	davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, idan.brown@oracle.com,
	Yuval Shaia <yuval.shaia@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: dev_forward_skb(): Scrub packet's per-netns info only when crossing netns
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 17:54:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180315175444.02d70f23@halley> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cd0b73e3-2cde-1442-4312-566c69571e8a@iogearbox.net>

On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 16:13:39 +0100 Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> wrote:
> On 03/15/2018 01:50 PM, Shmulik Ladkani wrote:
> > 
> > It would be beneficial to have the mark preserved when skb is injected
> > to the slave device's rx path (especially when it's on the same netns).  
> 
> Right, I think also here the easiest would be to have a BPF_F_PRESERVE_MARK
> flag to opt-in in general case (xnet/non-xnet)

Sounds okay to me.

> But lets presume for a sec you would _not_ scrub it, then how are users
> supposed to make use of this? The feature/bug may not be critical enough
> (well, otherwise it wouldn't have been like this for long time) for stable,
> so to write an app relying on it the behavior will change from kernel A to
> kernel B, where you need to end up having a full blown veth run-time test
> in order to figure it out before you can use it, not really useful either.

Let's assume BPF_F_PRESERVE_MARK is a feature then, which is available only
in new kernels.
As said, this flag will not be honored by older kernels.

But your "run-time test" argument is true for every new flag-bit
introduced to bpf functions, for example:
 BPF_F_SEQ_NUMBER was added after other skb_set_tunnel_key flags,
 Same for BPF_F_INVALIDATE_HASH (skb_store_bytes), BPF_F_MARK_ENFORCE
 (l4_csum_replace) and others.

With every flag addition, the flag mask validation in the corresponding
bpf function has been relaxed to support it.

Why is BPF_F_PRESERVE_MARK any different from any previous flag addition?

Thanks,
Shmulik

  reply	other threads:[~2018-03-15 15:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-13 15:07 Liran Alon
2018-03-13 16:13 ` Yuval Shaia
2018-03-14 12:03   ` Yuval Shaia
2018-03-15  9:21 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2018-03-15 11:56   ` Daniel Borkmann
2018-03-15 12:50     ` Shmulik Ladkani
2018-03-15 15:13       ` Daniel Borkmann
2018-03-15 15:54         ` Shmulik Ladkani [this message]
2018-03-15 17:48           ` Daniel Borkmann
2018-03-20 14:47 ` David Miller
2018-03-20 15:34   ` Liran Alon
2018-03-20 16:00     ` David Miller
2018-03-20 16:11       ` Liran Alon
2018-03-20 16:34         ` David Miller
2018-03-20 16:39           ` Liran Alon
2018-03-20 18:51             ` valdis.kletnieks
2018-03-20 21:12               ` Liran Alon
2018-03-15 12:14 Liran Alon
2018-03-15 12:23 Liran Alon
2018-03-15 14:35 ` Roman Mashak
2018-03-15 14:53   ` Daniel Borkmann
2018-03-15 15:01 Liran Alon
2018-03-15 16:11 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2018-03-15 15:05 Liran Alon
2018-03-15 16:35 Liran Alon
2018-03-15 16:50 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2018-03-15 17:14 Liran Alon
2018-03-20 16:24 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-03-20 16:44   ` Liran Alon
2018-03-20 17:07     ` Ben Greear
2018-03-20 18:35       ` Eric W. Biederman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180315175444.02d70f23@halley \
    --to=shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=idan.brown@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liran.alon@oracle.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yuval.shaia@oracle.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH] net: dev_forward_skb(): Scrub packet'\''s per-netns info only when crossing netns' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).