LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Wang Long <wanglong19@meituan.com>
Cc: tj@kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, gthelen@google.com,
	akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Is it correctly that the usage for spin_{lock|unlock}_irq in clear_page_dirty_for_io
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2018 14:03:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180403120312.GS5501@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d5f73e91-6fd5-12ab-d005-93a72e146464@meituan.com>

On Mon 02-04-18 19:50:50, Wang Long wrote:
> 
> Hi,  Johannes Weiner and Tejun Heo
> 
> I use linux-4.4.y to test the new cgroup controller io and the current
> stable kernel linux-4.4.y has the follow logic
> 
> 
> int clear_page_dirty_for_io(struct page *page){
> ...
> ...
>                 memcg = mem_cgroup_begin_page_stat(page); ----------(a)
>                 wb = unlocked_inode_to_wb_begin(inode, &locked); ---------(b)
>                 if (TestClearPageDirty(page)) {
>                         mem_cgroup_dec_page_stat(memcg, MEM_CGROUP_STAT_DIRTY);
>                         dec_zone_page_state(page, NR_FILE_DIRTY);
>                         dec_wb_stat(wb, WB_RECLAIMABLE);
>                         ret =1;
>                 }
>                 unlocked_inode_to_wb_end(inode, locked); -----------(c)
>                 mem_cgroup_end_page_stat(memcg); -------------(d)
>                 return ret;
> ...
> ...
> }
> 
> 
> when memcg is moving, and I_WB_SWITCH flags for inode is set. the logic
> is the following:
> 
> 
> spin_lock_irqsave(&memcg->move_lock, flags); -------------(a)
>         spin_lock_irq(&inode->i_mapping->tree_lock); ------------(b)
>         spin_unlock_irq(&inode->i_mapping->tree_lock); -----------(c)
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&memcg->move_lock, flags); -----------(d)
> 
> 
> after (c) , the local irq is enabled. I think it is not correct.
> 
> We get a deadlock backtrace after (c), the cpu get an softirq and in the
> irq it also call mem_cgroup_begin_page_stat to lock the same
> memcg->move_lock.
> 
> Since the conditions are too harsh, this scenario is difficult to
> reproduce.  But it really exists.
> 
> So how about change (b) (c) to spin_lock_irqsave/spin_lock_irqrestore?

Yes, it seems we really need this even for the current tree. Please note
that At least clear_page_dirty_for_io doesn't lock memcg anymore.
__cancel_dirty_page still uses lock_page_memcg though (former
mem_cgroup_begin_page_stat).
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

  reply	other threads:[~2018-04-03 12:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <157ed606-4a61-508b-d26a-2f5d638f39bb@meituan.com>
2018-04-02 11:50 ` [RFC] Is it correctly that the usage for spin_{lock|unlock}_irq in clear_page_dirty_for_io Wang Long
2018-04-03 12:03   ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2018-04-03 23:12     ` Greg Thelen
2018-04-04  6:31       ` Wang Long
2018-04-06  8:03         ` [PATCH] writeback: safer lock nesting Greg Thelen
2018-04-06  8:07           ` Michal Hocko
2018-04-06 18:49             ` Greg Thelen
2018-04-06 18:55               ` [PATCH v2] " Greg Thelen
2018-04-07 18:56                 ` kbuild test robot
2018-04-10  0:59                   ` [PATCH v3] " Greg Thelen
2018-04-10  6:33                     ` Michal Hocko
2018-04-10 20:48                       ` Andrew Morton
2018-04-11  5:50                         ` Michal Hocko
2018-04-10  8:14                     ` Wang Long
2018-04-11  0:40                       ` Greg Thelen
2018-04-10 20:37                     ` Andrew Morton
2018-04-11  1:03                       ` Greg Thelen
2018-04-11  8:46                         ` [PATCH v4] " Greg Thelen
2018-04-10 13:50           ` [PATCH] " Sasha Levin
2018-04-11  2:44             ` Wang Long
2018-04-11  3:13               ` Greg Thelen
2018-04-11  8:45                 ` [PATCH for-4.4] " Greg Thelen
2018-04-11  8:50                   ` Greg Thelen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180403120312.GS5501@dhcp22.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=gthelen@google.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=wanglong19@meituan.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).