LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Cgroups <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH] Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] mm: memcg: remote memcg charging for kmem allocations
Date: Fri,  6 Apr 2018 10:36:01 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180406173601.126152-1-shakeelb@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180315174941.GN23100@dhcp22.suse.cz>

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 10:49 AM, Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> wrote:
> Charging path is still a _hot path_. Especially when the kmem accounting
> is enabled by default. You cannot simply downplay the overhead. We have
> _one_ user but all users should pay the price. This is simply hard to
> justify. Maybe we can thing of something that would put the  burden on
> the charging context?

What do you think of the following?

Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
---
 mm/memcontrol.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 5d3ea8799a2c..205043283716 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -701,6 +701,20 @@ struct mem_cgroup *get_mem_cgroup_from_mm(struct mm_struct *mm)
 	return memcg;
 }
 
+static __always_inline struct mem_cgroup *get_mem_cgroup(
+				struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct mm_struct *mm)
+{
+	if (unlikely(memcg)) {
+		rcu_read_lock();
+		if (css_tryget_online(&memcg->css)) {
+			rcu_read_unlock();
+			return memcg;
+		}
+		rcu_read_unlock();
+	}
+	return get_mem_cgroup_from_mm(mm);
+}
+
 /**
  * mem_cgroup_iter - iterate over memory cgroup hierarchy
  * @root: hierarchy root
@@ -2119,15 +2133,6 @@ static void commit_charge(struct page *page, struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
 }
 
 #ifndef CONFIG_SLOB
-static struct mem_cgroup *get_mem_cgroup(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
-{
-	rcu_read_lock();
-	if (!css_tryget_online(&memcg->css))
-		memcg = NULL;
-	rcu_read_unlock();
-	return memcg;
-}
-
 static int memcg_alloc_cache_id(void)
 {
 	int id, size;
@@ -2257,7 +2262,7 @@ static inline bool memcg_kmem_bypass(void)
  */
 struct kmem_cache *memcg_kmem_get_cache(struct kmem_cache *cachep)
 {
-	struct mem_cgroup *memcg = NULL;
+	struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
 	struct kmem_cache *memcg_cachep;
 	int kmemcg_id;
 
@@ -2269,10 +2274,7 @@ struct kmem_cache *memcg_kmem_get_cache(struct kmem_cache *cachep)
 	if (current->memcg_kmem_skip_account)
 		return cachep;
 
-	if (current->target_memcg)
-		memcg = get_mem_cgroup(current->target_memcg);
-	if (!memcg)
-		memcg = get_mem_cgroup_from_mm(current->mm);
+	memcg = get_mem_cgroup(current->target_memcg, current->mm);
 	kmemcg_id = READ_ONCE(memcg->kmemcg_id);
 	if (kmemcg_id < 0)
 		goto out;
@@ -2350,16 +2352,13 @@ int memcg_kmem_charge_memcg(struct page *page, gfp_t gfp, int order,
  */
 int memcg_kmem_charge(struct page *page, gfp_t gfp, int order)
 {
-	struct mem_cgroup *memcg = NULL;
+	struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
 	int ret = 0;
 
 	if (memcg_kmem_bypass())
 		return 0;
 
-	if (current->target_memcg)
-		memcg = get_mem_cgroup(current->target_memcg);
-	if (!memcg)
-		memcg = get_mem_cgroup_from_mm(current->mm);
+	memcg = get_mem_cgroup(current->target_memcg, current->mm);
 	if (!mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg)) {
 		ret = memcg_kmem_charge_memcg(page, gfp, order, memcg);
 		if (!ret)
-- 
2.17.0.484.g0c8726318c-goog

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-04-06 17:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-21 22:37 [PATCH v3 0/2] Directed kmem charging Shakeel Butt
2018-02-21 22:37 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] mm: memcg: remote memcg charging for kmem allocations Shakeel Butt
2018-03-13 13:49   ` Michal Hocko
2018-03-13 17:55     ` Shakeel Butt
2018-03-15 17:49       ` Michal Hocko
2018-03-15 18:25         ` Shakeel Butt
2018-04-06 17:36         ` Shakeel Butt [this message]
2018-02-21 22:37 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] fs: fsnotify: account fsnotify metadata to kmemcg Shakeel Butt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180406173601.126152-1-shakeelb@google.com \
    --to=shakeelb@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=gthelen@google.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).