LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>, kvm@vger.kernel.org, jasowang@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] vhost: fix vhost_vq_access_ok() log check Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 16:27:51 +0300 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20180410162522-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20180410161905-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 04:22:35PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 01:26:29PM +0800, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > > Commit d65026c6c62e7d9616c8ceb5a53b68bcdc050525 ("vhost: validate log > > when IOTLB is enabled") introduced a regression. The logic was > > originally: > > > > if (vq->iotlb) > > return 1; > > return A && B; > > > > After the patch the short-circuit logic for A was inverted: > > > > if (A || vq->iotlb) > > return A; > > return B; > > > > This patch fixes the regression by rewriting the checks in the obvious > > way, no longer returning A when vq->iotlb is non-NULL (which is hard to > > understand). > > > > Reported-by: syzbot+65a84dde0214b0387ccd@syzkaller.appspotmail.com > > Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> > > This patch only makes sense after patch 2/2 is applied. > Otherwise the logic seems reversed below. > > Can you pls squash these two? Oh, in fact the patch is ok. This just goes to show that patch 2/2 is useful. But squashing is not required. Sorry about the noise. Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Fixes: d65026c6c ("vhost: validate log when IOTLB is enabled") probably stable material since patch it fixes was queued to stable? > > --- > > drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 8 +++++--- > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c > > index 5320039671b7..93fd0c75b0d8 100644 > > --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c > > +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c > > @@ -1244,10 +1244,12 @@ static int vq_log_access_ok(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, > > /* Caller should have vq mutex and device mutex */ > > int vhost_vq_access_ok(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq) > > { > > - int ret = vq_log_access_ok(vq, vq->log_base); > > + if (!vq_log_access_ok(vq, vq->log_base)) > > + return 0; > > > > - if (ret || vq->iotlb) > > - return ret; > > + /* Access validation occurs at prefetch time with IOTLB */ > > + if (vq->iotlb) > > + return 1; > > > > return vq_access_ok(vq, vq->num, vq->desc, vq->avail, vq->used); > > } > > -- > > 2.14.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-10 13:27 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2018-04-10 5:26 [PATCH v2 0/2] vhost: fix vhost_vq_access_ok() log check Stefan Hajnoczi 2018-04-10 5:26 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] " Stefan Hajnoczi 2018-04-10 13:22 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2018-04-10 13:27 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message] 2018-04-10 5:26 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] vhost: return bool from *_access_ok() functions Stefan Hajnoczi 2018-04-10 13:29 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2018-04-10 6:40 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] vhost: fix vhost_vq_access_ok() log check Jason Wang 2018-04-10 14:50 ` David Miller 2018-04-11 1:21 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20180410162522-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \ --to=mst@redhat.com \ --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \ --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \ --cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \ --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \ --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).