From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751940AbeDSJQK (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Apr 2018 05:16:10 -0400 Received: from mx3-rdu2.redhat.com ([66.187.233.73]:33348 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750989AbeDSJQJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Apr 2018 05:16:09 -0400 Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 11:16:05 +0200 From: Cornelia Huck To: Dong Jia Shi Cc: Dong Jia Shi , Halil Pasic , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfio-ccw: process ssch with interrupts disabled Message-ID: <20180419111605.31354176.cohuck@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20180418082931.GO5428@bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20180413140509.9042-1-cohuck@redhat.com> <20180418082931.GO5428@bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Organization: Red Hat GmbH MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 18 Apr 2018 16:29:31 +0800 Dong Jia Shi wrote: > * Cornelia Huck [2018-04-13 16:05:09 +0200]: > > Nitpick for the title: > vfio-ccw: process ssch with interrupts disabled > > Should be "vfio: ccw:"? Yes, that seems to be the more common title. I've added a cc:stable as well (as the current trend seems to be to rather add more to stable than less) and pushed out. Unless there are complaints, I'll send a pull req tomorrow.