LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> To: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com> Cc: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.co.uk>, Sebastian Reichel <sre@kernel.org>, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, kernel@collabora.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 3/8] drm/omap: add support for manually updated displays Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2018 10:11:00 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20180420081100.GO31310@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw) In-Reply-To: <a078d8c3-9e65-cc7b-737a-cbd5cf141f95@ti.com> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 10:09:38AM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > Hi Sebastian, > > On 30/03/18 20:18, Sebastian Reichel wrote: > > This adds the required infrastructure for manually > > updated displays, such as DSI command mode panels. > > > > While those panels often support partial updates > > we currently always do a full refresh. Display > > will be refreshed when something calls the dirty > > callback, such as libdrm's drmModeDirtyFB(). > > > > This is currently being implemented for the kernel > > console and for Xorg. Weston currently does not > > implement this and is known not to work on manually > > updated displays. > > > > Tested-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> > > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.co.uk> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_crtc.c | 107 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > > drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_crtc.h | 1 + > > drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_fb.c | 20 +++++++ > > 3 files changed, 120 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_crtc.c > > index b893985e4efb..1b91bff5bac6 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_crtc.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_crtc.c > > @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ struct omap_crtc { > > bool pending; > > wait_queue_head_t pending_wait; > > struct drm_pending_vblank_event *event; > > + struct delayed_work update_work; > > > > void (*framedone_handler)(void *); > > void *framedone_handler_data; > > @@ -146,6 +147,25 @@ static void omap_crtc_dss_disconnect(struct omap_drm_private *priv, > > static void omap_crtc_dss_start_update(struct omap_drm_private *priv, > > enum omap_channel channel) > > { > > + priv->dispc_ops->mgr_enable(priv->dispc, channel, true); > > +} > > + > > +static bool omap_crtc_is_manually_updated(struct drm_crtc *crtc) > > +{ > > + struct drm_connector *connector; > > + struct drm_connector_list_iter conn_iter; > > + bool result = false; > > + > > + drm_connector_list_iter_begin(crtc->dev, &conn_iter); > > + drm_for_each_connector_iter(connector, &conn_iter) { > > + if (connector->state->crtc != crtc) > > + continue; > > + result = omap_connector_get_manually_updated(connector); > > + break; > > + } > > + drm_connector_list_iter_end(&conn_iter); > > It would be much nicer if the is-manual flag was somehow conveyed from > connector/encoder to the crtc when doing modesetting. I don't know how > or where, so just thinking out loud. However, if we need to do such loop > as above, I think we should just do it once, perhaps in > omap_crtc_atomic_enable, and store the value in omap_crtc's private data. Do it in your atomic_check code, and store it as a omap private bit in omap_crtc_state. That guarantees you that it's always up-to-date, and will never change (except when you get a completely new state). Recomputing derived state like this as part of your atomic_commit code isn't recommended much. -Daniel > > > + > > + return result; > > } > > > > /* Called only from the encoder enable/disable and suspend/resume handlers. */ > > @@ -157,12 +177,17 @@ static void omap_crtc_set_enabled(struct drm_crtc *crtc, bool enable) > > enum omap_channel channel = omap_crtc->channel; > > struct omap_irq_wait *wait; > > u32 framedone_irq, vsync_irq; > > + bool is_manual = omap_crtc_is_manually_updated(crtc); > > + enum omap_display_type type = omap_crtc_output[channel]->output_type; > > int ret; > > > > if (WARN_ON(omap_crtc->enabled == enable)) > > return; > > > > - if (omap_crtc_output[channel]->output_type == OMAP_DISPLAY_TYPE_HDMI) { > > + if (is_manual) > > + omap_irq_enable_framedone(crtc, enable); > > + > > + if (is_manual || type == OMAP_DISPLAY_TYPE_HDMI) { > > priv->dispc_ops->mgr_enable(priv->dispc, channel, enable); > > omap_crtc->enabled = enable; > > return; > > This doesn't look correct, omap_crtc_dss_start_update() already sets the > enable bit for manual update displays. And you don't want to set the > enable to false with manual update displays. > > HDMI handling here is already a special case due to HW issues, so I'd > rather see the manual update handled separately from the HDMI. > > > @@ -214,7 +239,6 @@ static void omap_crtc_set_enabled(struct drm_crtc *crtc, bool enable) > > } > > } > > > > - > > static int omap_crtc_dss_enable(struct omap_drm_private *priv, > > enum omap_channel channel) > > { > > @@ -378,6 +402,53 @@ void omap_crtc_framedone_irq(struct drm_crtc *crtc, uint32_t irqstatus) > > wake_up(&omap_crtc->pending_wait); > > } > > > > +void omap_crtc_flush(struct drm_crtc *crtc) > > +{ > > + struct omap_crtc *omap_crtc = to_omap_crtc(crtc); > > + > > + if (!omap_crtc_is_manually_updated(crtc)) > > + return; > > + > > + if (!delayed_work_pending(&omap_crtc->update_work)) > > + schedule_delayed_work(&omap_crtc->update_work, 0); > > +} > > Why delayed work here? > > It's actually not quite clear to me how manual update displays work with > DRM... > > As far as I see, we have essentially two cases: 1) single buffering, > where the userspace must set an area in the fb dirty, which then > triggers the update, 2) multi buffering, which doesn't need fb dirty, > but just a page flip which triggers the update. > > In the 2) case (which I think is the optimal case which all the modern > apps should use), there's no need for delayed work or any work, and the > code flow should be very similar to the auto-update model. > > Also, as Daniel mentioned in "drm/omapdrm: Nuke > omap_framebuffer_get_next_connector()" thread, the dirtying mechanism in > the series is not valid. > > Tomi > > -- > Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki. > Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki > _______________________________________________ > dri-devel mailing list > dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-20 8:11 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2018-03-30 17:18 [PATCHv3 0/8] omapdrm: DSI command mode panel support Sebastian Reichel 2018-03-30 17:18 ` [PATCHv3 1/8] drm/omap: add framedone interrupt support Sebastian Reichel 2018-03-30 17:18 ` [PATCHv3 2/8] drm/omap: add manual update detection helper Sebastian Reichel 2018-03-30 17:18 ` [PATCHv3 3/8] drm/omap: add support for manually updated displays Sebastian Reichel 2018-04-20 7:09 ` Tomi Valkeinen 2018-04-20 8:11 ` Daniel Vetter [this message] 2018-04-20 10:19 ` Daniel Stone 2018-04-20 14:25 ` Tony Lindgren 2018-04-20 14:39 ` Daniel Stone 2018-04-20 14:44 ` Tony Lindgren 2018-03-30 17:18 ` [PATCHv3 4/8] drm/omap: make omap_framebuffer_get_next_connector static Sebastian Reichel 2018-03-30 17:18 ` [PATCHv3 5/8] dt-bindings: panel: common: document orientation property Sebastian Reichel 2018-04-03 10:49 ` Pavel Machek 2018-04-09 20:29 ` Rob Herring 2018-03-30 17:18 ` [PATCHv3 6/8] drm/omap: add support for rotation hints from display drivers Sebastian Reichel 2018-03-30 17:18 ` [PATCHv3 7/8] drm/omap: panel-dsi-cm: add rotation support Sebastian Reichel 2018-04-03 10:49 ` Pavel Machek 2018-03-30 17:18 ` [PATCHv3 8/8] ARM: dts: omap4-droid4: Add LCD panel rotation property Sebastian Reichel 2018-04-03 10:49 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20180420081100.GO31310@phenom.ffwll.local \ --to=daniel@ffwll.ch \ --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \ --cc=kernel@collabora.com \ --cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \ --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \ --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \ --cc=sebastian.reichel@collabora.co.uk \ --cc=sre@kernel.org \ --cc=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \ --cc=tony@atomide.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).