From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932461AbeDWULq (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Apr 2018 16:11:46 -0400 Received: from mail-pf0-f171.google.com ([209.85.192.171]:41789 "EHLO mail-pf0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932393AbeDWULk (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Apr 2018 16:11:40 -0400 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx48lffZIRezapvqx818ttlOe5IcI90GgR8EKBBWWrNhVDc3mAw5tAi+vZBpGoFM9rPgpvsnX/A== Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 14:11:36 -0600 From: Alexei Starovoitov To: Jiri Olsa Cc: Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , lkml , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Quentin Monnet Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] bpf: Store/dump license string for loaded program Message-ID: <20180423201134.r56ts7usec4jjnbh@ast-mbp> References: <20180423065927.23127-1-jolsa@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180423065927.23127-1-jolsa@kernel.org> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180223 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 08:59:24AM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote: > hi, > sending the change to store and dump the license > info for loaded BPF programs. It's important for > us get the license info, when investigating on > screwed up machine. hmm. boolean flag whether bpf prog is gpl or not is already exposed via bpf_prog_info. I see no point of wasting extra 128 bytes of kernel memory.