LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
Agustin Vega-Frias <agustinv@codeaurora.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Ganapatrao Kulkarni <ganapatrao.kulkarni@cavium.com>,
Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Shaokun Zhang <zhangshaokun@hisilicon.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 09/12] perf pmu: Fix core PMU alias list for X86 platform
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 13:00:05 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180425160008.3407-10-acme@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180425160008.3407-1-acme@kernel.org>
From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
When counting uncore event with alias, core event is mistakenly
involved, for example:
perf stat --no-merge -e "unc_m_cas_count.all" -C0 sleep 1
Performance counter stats for 'CPU(s) 0':
0 unc_m_cas_count.all [uncore_imc_4]
0 unc_m_cas_count.all [uncore_imc_2]
0 unc_m_cas_count.all [uncore_imc_0]
153,640 unc_m_cas_count.all [cpu]
0 unc_m_cas_count.all [uncore_imc_5]
25,026 unc_m_cas_count.all [uncore_imc_3]
0 unc_m_cas_count.all [uncore_imc_1]
1.001447890 seconds time elapsed
The reason is that current implementation doesn't check PMU name of a
event when adding its alias into the alias list for core PMU. The
uncore event aliases are mistakenly added.
This bug was introduced in:
commit 14b22ae028de ("perf pmu: Add helper function is_pmu_core to
detect PMU CORE devices")
Checking the PMU name for all PMUs on X86 and other architectures except
ARM.
There is no behavior change for ARM.
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Agustin Vega-Frias <agustinv@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <ganapatrao.kulkarni@cavium.com>
Cc: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Shaokun Zhang <zhangshaokun@hisilicon.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Fixes: 14b22ae028de ("perf pmu: Add helper function is_pmu_core to detect PMU CORE devices")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1524594014-79243-1-git-send-email-kan.liang@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
---
tools/perf/util/pmu.c | 20 +++++++-------------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/pmu.c b/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
index af4bedf4cf98..d2fb597c9a8c 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
@@ -539,9 +539,10 @@ static bool pmu_is_uncore(const char *name)
/*
* PMU CORE devices have different name other than cpu in sysfs on some
- * platforms. looking for possible sysfs files to identify as core device.
+ * platforms.
+ * Looking for possible sysfs files to identify the arm core device.
*/
-static int is_pmu_core(const char *name)
+static int is_arm_pmu_core(const char *name)
{
struct stat st;
char path[PATH_MAX];
@@ -550,12 +551,6 @@ static int is_pmu_core(const char *name)
if (!sysfs)
return 0;
- /* Look for cpu sysfs (x86 and others) */
- scnprintf(path, PATH_MAX, "%s/bus/event_source/devices/cpu", sysfs);
- if ((stat(path, &st) == 0) &&
- (strncmp(name, "cpu", strlen("cpu")) == 0))
- return 1;
-
/* Look for cpu sysfs (specific to arm) */
scnprintf(path, PATH_MAX, "%s/bus/event_source/devices/%s/cpus",
sysfs, name);
@@ -668,6 +663,7 @@ static void pmu_add_cpu_aliases(struct list_head *head, struct perf_pmu *pmu)
struct pmu_events_map *map;
struct pmu_event *pe;
const char *name = pmu->name;
+ const char *pname;
map = perf_pmu__find_map(pmu);
if (!map)
@@ -686,11 +682,9 @@ static void pmu_add_cpu_aliases(struct list_head *head, struct perf_pmu *pmu)
break;
}
- if (!is_pmu_core(name)) {
- /* check for uncore devices */
- if (pe->pmu == NULL)
- continue;
- if (strncmp(pe->pmu, name, strlen(pe->pmu)))
+ if (!is_arm_pmu_core(name)) {
+ pname = pe->pmu ? pe->pmu : "cpu";
+ if (strncmp(pname, name, strlen(pname)))
continue;
}
--
2.14.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-25 16:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-25 15:59 [GIT PULL 00/12] perf/urgent fixes Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-04-25 15:59 ` [PATCH 01/12] perf machine: Set main kernel end address properly Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-04-25 15:59 ` [PATCH 02/12] perf list: Remove s390 specific strcmp_cpuid_cmp function Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-04-25 15:59 ` [PATCH 03/12] perf test: Adapt test case record+probe_libc_inet_pton.sh for s390 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-04-25 16:00 ` [PATCH 04/12] perf stat: Keep the / modifier separator in fallback Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-04-25 16:00 ` [PATCH 05/12] perf pmu: Fix pmu events parsing rule Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-05-03 8:25 ` Adrian Hunter
2018-05-03 10:37 ` Jiri Olsa
2018-05-03 11:38 ` Adrian Hunter
2018-05-03 11:47 ` Jiri Olsa
2018-05-04 16:02 ` Jiri Olsa
2018-05-06 3:43 ` Andi Kleen
2018-05-06 14:28 ` [PATCH] perf tools: Fix parser for empty pmu terms case Jiri Olsa
2018-05-06 16:34 ` Liang, Kan
2018-05-07 7:21 ` Adrian Hunter
2018-05-07 8:12 ` Jiri Olsa
2018-05-07 15:04 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-05-07 18:37 ` [PATCH 05/12] perf pmu: Fix pmu events parsing rule Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-05-07 19:16 ` Jiri Olsa
2018-05-07 19:26 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-05-07 19:24 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-05-07 19:42 ` Jiri Olsa
2018-04-25 16:00 ` [PATCH 06/12] perf evsel: Disable write_backward for leader sampling group events Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-04-25 16:00 ` [PATCH 07/12] perf mem: Document incorrect and missing options Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-04-25 16:00 ` [PATCH 08/12] perf record: Fix s390 undefined record__auxtrace_init() return value Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-04-25 16:00 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2018-04-25 16:00 ` [PATCH 10/12] perf stat: Print out hint for mixed PMU group error Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-04-25 16:00 ` [PATCH 11/12] perf evsel: Only fall back group read for leader Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-04-25 16:00 ` [PATCH 12/12] perf stat: Fix duplicate PMU name for interval print Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-04-26 5:33 ` [GIT PULL 00/12] perf/urgent fixes Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180425160008.3407-10-acme@kernel.org \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=agustinv@codeaurora.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ganapatrao.kulkarni@cavium.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=williams@redhat.com \
--cc=yao.jin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=zhangshaokun@hisilicon.com \
--subject='Re: [PATCH 09/12] perf pmu: Fix core PMU alias list for X86 platform' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).