LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie@intel.com>,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	wexu@redhat.com, jfreimann@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v3 0/5] virtio: support packed ring
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2018 07:18:03 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180427071725-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5ad1ca01-1e5c-7105-f303-7e8d42f6a068@redhat.com>

On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 11:56:05AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2018年04月25日 13:15, Tiwei Bie wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
> > 
> > This RFC implements packed ring support in virtio driver.
> > 
> > Some simple functional tests have been done with Jason's
> > packed ring implementation in vhost:
> > 
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/23/12
> > 
> > Both of ping and netperf worked as expected (with EVENT_IDX
> > disabled). But there are below known issues:
> > 
> > 1. Reloading the guest driver will break the Tx/Rx;
> 
> Will have a look at this issue.
> 
> > 2. Zeroing the flags when detaching a used desc will
> >     break the guest -> host path.
> 
> I still think zeroing flags is unnecessary or even a bug. At host, I track
> last observed avail wrap counter and detect avail like (what is suggested in
> the example code in the spec):
> 
> static bool desc_is_avail(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, __virtio16 flags)
> {
>        bool avail = flags & cpu_to_vhost16(vq, DESC_AVAIL);
> 
>        return avail == vq->avail_wrap_counter;
> }
> 
> So zeroing wrap can not work with this obviously.
> 
> Thanks

I agree. I think what one should do is flip the available bit.

> > 
> > Some simple functional tests have also been done with
> > Wei's packed ring implementation in QEMU:
> > 
> > http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-04/msg00342.html
> > 
> > Both of ping and netperf worked as expected (with EVENT_IDX
> > disabled). Reloading the guest driver also worked as expected.
> > 
> > TODO:
> > - Refinements (for code and commit log) and bug fixes;
> > - Discuss/fix/test EVENT_IDX support;
> > - Test devices other than net;
> > 
> > RFC v2 -> RFC v3:
> > - Split into small patches (Jason);
> > - Add helper virtqueue_use_indirect() (Jason);
> > - Just set id for the last descriptor of a list (Jason);
> > - Calculate the prev in virtqueue_add_packed() (Jason);
> > - Fix/improve desc suppression code (Jason/MST);
> > - Refine the code layout for XXX_split/packed and wrappers (MST);
> > - Fix the comments and API in uapi (MST);
> > - Remove the BUG_ON() for indirect (Jason);
> > - Some other refinements and bug fixes;
> > 
> > RFC v1 -> RFC v2:
> > - Add indirect descriptor support - compile test only;
> > - Add event suppression supprt - compile test only;
> > - Move vring_packed_init() out of uapi (Jason, MST);
> > - Merge two loops into one in virtqueue_add_packed() (Jason);
> > - Split vring_unmap_one() for packed ring and split ring (Jason);
> > - Avoid using '%' operator (Jason);
> > - Rename free_head -> next_avail_idx (Jason);
> > - Add comments for virtio_wmb() in virtqueue_add_packed() (Jason);
> > - Some other refinements and bug fixes;
> > 
> > Thanks!
> > 
> > Tiwei Bie (5):
> >    virtio: add packed ring definitions
> >    virtio_ring: support creating packed ring
> >    virtio_ring: add packed ring support
> >    virtio_ring: add event idx support in packed ring
> >    virtio_ring: enable packed ring
> > 
> >   drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c       | 1271 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> >   include/linux/virtio_ring.h        |    8 +-
> >   include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h |   12 +-
> >   include/uapi/linux/virtio_ring.h   |   36 +
> >   4 files changed, 1049 insertions(+), 278 deletions(-)
> > 

  reply	other threads:[~2018-04-27  4:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-25  5:15 Tiwei Bie
2018-04-25  5:15 ` [RFC v3 1/5] virtio: add packed ring definitions Tiwei Bie
2018-04-25  5:15 ` [RFC v3 2/5] virtio_ring: support creating packed ring Tiwei Bie
2018-04-25  5:15 ` [RFC v3 3/5] virtio_ring: add packed ring support Tiwei Bie
2018-05-10  7:32   ` Jason Wang
2018-05-10  7:34     ` Jason Wang
2018-05-10  8:56       ` Tiwei Bie
2018-05-10  9:49         ` Jason Wang
2018-05-10 10:50           ` Tiwei Bie
2018-04-25  5:15 ` [RFC v3 4/5] virtio_ring: add event idx support in packed ring Tiwei Bie
2018-05-02  2:51   ` Jason Wang
2018-05-02  7:28     ` Tiwei Bie
2018-05-02 13:51       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-05-02 15:12         ` Tiwei Bie
2018-05-02 15:42           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-05-03  1:11             ` Tiwei Bie
2018-05-03  1:44               ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-05-03  2:09                 ` Tiwei Bie
2018-05-03  7:25                   ` Jason Wang
2018-05-03 13:54                     ` Tiwei Bie
2018-05-08  3:05                       ` Jason Wang
2018-05-08  5:40                         ` Jason Wang
2018-05-08  6:44                           ` Tiwei Bie
2018-05-08  7:16                             ` Jason Wang
2018-05-08  9:16                               ` Tiwei Bie
2018-05-08  9:34                                 ` Jason Wang
2018-05-08  9:44                                   ` Tiwei Bie
2018-05-09  3:43                                     ` Jason Wang
2018-05-16  5:01   ` Jason Wang
2018-05-16  5:55     ` Tiwei Bie
2018-04-25  5:15 ` [RFC v3 5/5] virtio_ring: enable " Tiwei Bie
2018-04-27  3:56 ` [RFC v3 0/5] virtio: support " Jason Wang
2018-04-27  4:18   ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2018-04-27  6:17     ` Jason Wang
2018-04-27  9:12       ` Tiwei Bie
2018-04-28  2:45         ` Jason Wang
2018-05-02  3:49 ` Jason Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180427071725-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
    --to=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=jfreimann@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tiwei.bie@intel.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=wexu@redhat.com \
    --subject='Re: [RFC v3 0/5] virtio: support packed ring' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).