Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC NOTES] x86 ZONE_DMA love

[Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>]

On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 09:18:43AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 09:54:06PM +0000, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > > In practice if you don't have a floppy device on x86, you don't need ZONE_DMA,
> > 
> > I call BS on that, and you actually explain later why it it BS due
> > to some drivers using it more explicitly.  But even more importantly
> > we have plenty driver using it through dma_alloc_* and a small DMA
> > mask, and they are in use - we actually had a 4.16 regression due to
> > them.
> 
> Well, but do we need a zone for that purpose? The idea was to actually
> replace the zone by a CMA pool (at least on x86). With the current
> implementation of the CMA we would move the range [0-16M] pfn range into 
> zone_movable so it can be used and we would get rid of all of the
> overhead each zone brings (a bit in page flags, kmalloc caches and who
> knows what else)

That wasn't clear in the mail.  But if we have anothr way to allocate
<16MB memory we don't need ZONE_DMA for the floppy driver either, so the
above conclusion is still wrong.

> -- 
> Michal Hocko
> SUSE Labs
---end quoted text---