From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751808AbeD1Ulf (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Apr 2018 16:41:35 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.133]:59566 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751151AbeD1Uld (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Apr 2018 16:41:33 -0400 Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2018 13:41:18 -0700 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Julia Lawall Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" , Christoph Hellwig , Dan Carpenter , linux-mm@kvack.org, mhocko@kernel.org, cl@linux.com, Jan Kara , matthew@wil.cx, x86@kernel.org, luto@amacapital.net, martin.petersen@oracle.com, jthumshirn@suse.de, broonie@kernel.org, Juergen Gross , linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, Joerg Roedel , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org" Subject: Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC NOTES] x86 ZONE_DMA love Message-ID: <20180428204118.GA3305@bombadil.infradead.org> References: <20180426215406.GB27853@wotan.suse.de> <20180427053556.GB11339@infradead.org> <20180427161456.GD27853@wotan.suse.de> <20180428084221.GD31684@infradead.org> <20180428185514.GW27853@wotan.suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 09:46:52PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote: > FWIW, here is my semantic patch and the output - it reports on things that > appear to be too small and things that it doesn't know about. > > What are the relevant pci wrappers? I didn't find them. Basically all of the functions in include/linux/pci-dma-compat.h > too small: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c:1138: 30 > too small: drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/dma.c:1068: 30 > unknown: sound/pci/ctxfi/cthw20k2.c:2033: DMA_BIT_MASK(dma_bits) > unknown: sound/pci/ctxfi/cthw20k2.c:2034: DMA_BIT_MASK(dma_bits) This one's good: const unsigned int dma_bits = BITS_PER_LONG; > unknown: drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c:6036: consistent_mask and this one: consistent_mask = (instance->adapter_type == VENTURA_SERIES) ? DMA_BIT_MASK(64) : DMA_BIT_MASK(32); > unknown: drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/txrx.c:200: DMA_BIT_MASK(wil->dma_addr_size) if (wil->dma_addr_size > 32) dma_set_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(wil->dma_addr_size)); > unknown: drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_main.c:452: DMA_BIT_MASK(NFP_NET_MAX_DMA_BITS) drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net.h:#define NFP_NET_MAX_DMA_BITS 40 > unknown: drivers/gpu/host1x/dev.c:199: host->info->dma_mask Looks safe ... drivers/gpu/host1x/bus.c: device->dev.coherent_dma_mask = host1x->dev->coherent_dma_mask; drivers/gpu/host1x/bus.c: device->dev.dma_mask = &device->dev.coherent_dma_mask; drivers/gpu/host1x/dev.c: .dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32), drivers/gpu/host1x/dev.c: .dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32), drivers/gpu/host1x/dev.c: .dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(34), drivers/gpu/host1x/dev.c: .dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(34), drivers/gpu/host1x/dev.c: .dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(34), drivers/gpu/host1x/dev.c: dma_set_mask_and_coherent(host->dev, host->info->dma_mask); drivers/gpu/host1x/dev.h: u64 dma_mask; /* mask of addressable memory */ ... but that reminds us that maybe some drivers aren't using dma_set_mask() but rather touching dma_mask directly. ... 57 more to look at ...