LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie@intel.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
wexu@redhat.com, jfreimann@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v3 4/5] virtio_ring: add event idx support in packed ring
Date: Thu, 3 May 2018 09:11:16 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180503011116.qvoyblcpklinrk26@debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180502184015-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 06:42:57PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 11:12:55PM +0800, Tiwei Bie wrote:
> > On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 04:51:01PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 03:28:19PM +0800, Tiwei Bie wrote:
> > > > On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 10:51:06AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > > On 2018年04月25日 13:15, Tiwei Bie wrote:
> > > > > > This commit introduces the event idx support in packed
> > > > > > ring. This feature is temporarily disabled, because the
> > > > > > implementation in this patch may not work as expected,
> > > > > > and some further discussions on the implementation are
> > > > > > needed, e.g. do we have to check the wrap counter when
> > > > > > checking whether a kick is needed?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie@intel.com>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > > drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> > > > > > 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > > > > > index 0181e93897be..b1039c2985b9 100644
> > > > > > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > > > > > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > > > > > @@ -986,7 +986,7 @@ static inline int virtqueue_add_packed(struct virtqueue *_vq,
> > > > > > static bool virtqueue_kick_prepare_packed(struct virtqueue *_vq)
> > > > > > {
> > > > > > struct vring_virtqueue *vq = to_vvq(_vq);
> > > > > > - u16 flags;
> > > > > > + u16 new, old, off_wrap, flags;
> > > > > > bool needs_kick;
> > > > > > u32 snapshot;
> > > > > > @@ -995,7 +995,12 @@ static bool virtqueue_kick_prepare_packed(struct virtqueue *_vq)
> > > > > > * suppressions. */
> > > > > > virtio_mb(vq->weak_barriers);
> > > > > > + old = vq->next_avail_idx - vq->num_added;
> > > > > > + new = vq->next_avail_idx;
> > > > > > + vq->num_added = 0;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > snapshot = *(u32 *)vq->vring_packed.device;
> > > > > > + off_wrap = virtio16_to_cpu(_vq->vdev, snapshot & 0xffff);
> > > > > > flags = cpu_to_virtio16(_vq->vdev, snapshot >> 16) & 0x3;
> > > > > > #ifdef DEBUG
> > > > > > @@ -1006,7 +1011,10 @@ static bool virtqueue_kick_prepare_packed(struct virtqueue *_vq)
> > > > > > vq->last_add_time_valid = false;
> > > > > > #endif
> > > > > > - needs_kick = (flags != VRING_EVENT_F_DISABLE);
> > > > > > + if (flags == VRING_EVENT_F_DESC)
> > > > > > + needs_kick = vring_need_event(off_wrap & ~(1<<15), new, old);
> > > > >
> > > > > I wonder whether or not the math is correct. Both new and event are in the
> > > > > unit of descriptor ring size, but old looks not.
> > > >
> > > > What vring_need_event() cares is the distance between
> > > > `new` and `old`, i.e. vq->num_added. So I think there
> > > > is nothing wrong with `old`. But the calculation of the
> > > > distance between `new` and `event_idx` isn't right when
> > > > `new` wraps. How do you think about the below code:
> > > >
> > > > wrap_counter = off_wrap >> 15;
> > > > event_idx = off_wrap & ~(1<<15);
> > > > if (wrap_counter != vq->wrap_counter)
> > > > event_idx -= vq->vring_packed.num;
> > > >
> > > > needs_kick = vring_need_event(event_idx, new, old);
> > >
> > > I suspect this hack won't work for non power of 2 ring.
> >
> > Above code doesn't require the ring size to be a power of 2.
> >
> > For (__u16)(new_idx - old), what we want to get is vq->num_added.
> >
> > old = vq->next_avail_idx - vq->num_added;
> > new = vq->next_avail_idx;
> >
> > When vq->next_avail_idx >= vq->num_added, it's obvious that,
> > (__u16)(new_idx - old) is vq->num_added.
> >
> > And when vq->next_avail_idx < vq->num_added, new will be smaller
> > than old (old will be a big unsigned number), but (__u16)(new_idx
> > - old) is still vq->num_added.
> >
> > For (__u16)(new_idx - event_idx - 1), when new wraps and event_idx
> > doesn't wrap, the most straightforward way to calculate it is:
> > (new + vq->vring_packed.num) - event_idx - 1.
>
> So how about we use the straightforward way then?
You mean we do new += vq->vring_packed.num instead
of event_idx -= vq->vring_packed.num before calling
vring_need_event()?
The problem is that, the second param (new_idx) of
vring_need_event() will be used for:
(__u16)(new_idx - event_idx - 1)
(__u16)(new_idx - old)
So if we change new, we will need to change old too.
And that would be an ugly hack..
Best regards,
Tiwei Bie
>
> > But we can also calculate it in this way:
> >
> > event_idx -= vq->vring_packed.num;
> > (event_idx will be a big unsigned number)
> >
> > Then (__u16)(new_idx - event_idx - 1) will be the value we want.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Tiwei Bie
>
>
> > >
> > >
> > > > Best regards,
> > > > Tiwei Bie
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > >
> > > > > > + else
> > > > > > + needs_kick = (flags != VRING_EVENT_F_DISABLE);
> > > > > > END_USE(vq);
> > > > > > return needs_kick;
> > > > > > }
> > > > > > @@ -1116,6 +1124,15 @@ static void *virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_packed(struct virtqueue *_vq,
> > > > > > if (vq->last_used_idx >= vq->vring_packed.num)
> > > > > > vq->last_used_idx -= vq->vring_packed.num;
> > > > > > + /* If we expect an interrupt for the next entry, tell host
> > > > > > + * by writing event index and flush out the write before
> > > > > > + * the read in the next get_buf call. */
> > > > > > + if (vq->event_flags_shadow == VRING_EVENT_F_DESC)
> > > > > > + virtio_store_mb(vq->weak_barriers,
> > > > > > + &vq->vring_packed.driver->off_wrap,
> > > > > > + cpu_to_virtio16(_vq->vdev, vq->last_used_idx |
> > > > > > + (vq->wrap_counter << 15)));
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > #ifdef DEBUG
> > > > > > vq->last_add_time_valid = false;
> > > > > > #endif
> > > > > > @@ -1143,10 +1160,17 @@ static unsigned virtqueue_enable_cb_prepare_packed(struct virtqueue *_vq)
> > > > > > /* We optimistically turn back on interrupts, then check if there was
> > > > > > * more to do. */
> > > > > > + /* Depending on the VIRTIO_RING_F_USED_EVENT_IDX feature, we need to
> > > > > > + * either clear the flags bit or point the event index at the next
> > > > > > + * entry. Always update the event index to keep code simple. */
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + vq->vring_packed.driver->off_wrap = cpu_to_virtio16(_vq->vdev,
> > > > > > + vq->last_used_idx | (vq->wrap_counter << 15));
> > > > > > if (vq->event_flags_shadow == VRING_EVENT_F_DISABLE) {
> > > > > > virtio_wmb(vq->weak_barriers);
> > > > > > - vq->event_flags_shadow = VRING_EVENT_F_ENABLE;
> > > > > > + vq->event_flags_shadow = vq->event ? VRING_EVENT_F_DESC :
> > > > > > + VRING_EVENT_F_ENABLE;
> > > > > > vq->vring_packed.driver->flags = cpu_to_virtio16(_vq->vdev,
> > > > > > vq->event_flags_shadow);
> > > > > > }
> > > > > > @@ -1172,15 +1196,34 @@ static bool virtqueue_poll_packed(struct virtqueue *_vq, unsigned last_used_idx)
> > > > > > static bool virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed_packed(struct virtqueue *_vq)
> > > > > > {
> > > > > > struct vring_virtqueue *vq = to_vvq(_vq);
> > > > > > + u16 bufs, used_idx, wrap_counter;
> > > > > > START_USE(vq);
> > > > > > /* We optimistically turn back on interrupts, then check if there was
> > > > > > * more to do. */
> > > > > > + /* Depending on the VIRTIO_RING_F_USED_EVENT_IDX feature, we need to
> > > > > > + * either clear the flags bit or point the event index at the next
> > > > > > + * entry. Always update the event index to keep code simple. */
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + /* TODO: tune this threshold */
> > > > > > + bufs = (u16)(vq->next_avail_idx - vq->last_used_idx) * 3 / 4;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + used_idx = vq->last_used_idx + bufs;
> > > > > > + wrap_counter = vq->wrap_counter;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + if (used_idx >= vq->vring_packed.num) {
> > > > > > + used_idx -= vq->vring_packed.num;
> > > > > > + wrap_counter ^= 1;
> > > > > > + }
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + vq->vring_packed.driver->off_wrap = cpu_to_virtio16(_vq->vdev,
> > > > > > + used_idx | (wrap_counter << 15));
> > > > > > if (vq->event_flags_shadow == VRING_EVENT_F_DISABLE) {
> > > > > > virtio_wmb(vq->weak_barriers);
> > > > > > - vq->event_flags_shadow = VRING_EVENT_F_ENABLE;
> > > > > > + vq->event_flags_shadow = vq->event ? VRING_EVENT_F_DESC :
> > > > > > + VRING_EVENT_F_ENABLE;
> > > > > > vq->vring_packed.driver->flags = cpu_to_virtio16(_vq->vdev,
> > > > > > vq->event_flags_shadow);
> > > > > > }
> > > > > > @@ -1822,8 +1865,10 @@ void vring_transport_features(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> > > > > > switch (i) {
> > > > > > case VIRTIO_RING_F_INDIRECT_DESC:
> > > > > > break;
> > > > > > +#if 0
> > > > > > case VIRTIO_RING_F_EVENT_IDX:
> > > > > > break;
> > > > > > +#endif
> > > > > > case VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1:
> > > > > > break;
> > > > > > case VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM:
> > > > >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-03 1:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-25 5:15 [RFC v3 0/5] virtio: support " Tiwei Bie
2018-04-25 5:15 ` [RFC v3 1/5] virtio: add packed ring definitions Tiwei Bie
2018-04-25 5:15 ` [RFC v3 2/5] virtio_ring: support creating packed ring Tiwei Bie
2018-04-25 5:15 ` [RFC v3 3/5] virtio_ring: add packed ring support Tiwei Bie
2018-05-10 7:32 ` Jason Wang
2018-05-10 7:34 ` Jason Wang
2018-05-10 8:56 ` Tiwei Bie
2018-05-10 9:49 ` Jason Wang
2018-05-10 10:50 ` Tiwei Bie
2018-04-25 5:15 ` [RFC v3 4/5] virtio_ring: add event idx support in packed ring Tiwei Bie
2018-05-02 2:51 ` Jason Wang
2018-05-02 7:28 ` Tiwei Bie
2018-05-02 13:51 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-05-02 15:12 ` Tiwei Bie
2018-05-02 15:42 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-05-03 1:11 ` Tiwei Bie [this message]
2018-05-03 1:44 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-05-03 2:09 ` Tiwei Bie
2018-05-03 7:25 ` Jason Wang
2018-05-03 13:54 ` Tiwei Bie
2018-05-08 3:05 ` Jason Wang
2018-05-08 5:40 ` Jason Wang
2018-05-08 6:44 ` Tiwei Bie
2018-05-08 7:16 ` Jason Wang
2018-05-08 9:16 ` Tiwei Bie
2018-05-08 9:34 ` Jason Wang
2018-05-08 9:44 ` Tiwei Bie
2018-05-09 3:43 ` Jason Wang
2018-05-16 5:01 ` Jason Wang
2018-05-16 5:55 ` Tiwei Bie
2018-04-25 5:15 ` [RFC v3 5/5] virtio_ring: enable " Tiwei Bie
2018-04-27 3:56 ` [RFC v3 0/5] virtio: support " Jason Wang
2018-04-27 4:18 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-04-27 6:17 ` Jason Wang
2018-04-27 9:12 ` Tiwei Bie
2018-04-28 2:45 ` Jason Wang
2018-05-02 3:49 ` Jason Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180503011116.qvoyblcpklinrk26@debian \
--to=tiwei.bie@intel.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=jfreimann@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=wexu@redhat.com \
--subject='Re: [RFC v3 4/5] virtio_ring: add event idx support in packed ring' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).