LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
acme@kernel.org
Cc: brueckner@linux.vnet.ibm.com, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com,
heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH] perf: test 60 fails on s390 inline missing on s390
Date: Thu, 3 May 2018 08:58:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180503065837.71043-1-tmricht@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
perf test 60: probe libc's inet_pton & backtrace it with ping
fails on 4.17.0rc3. It turned out that function __inet_pton
is reported as inline:
[root@s8360047 perf]# ./perf script -i /tmp/perf.data.111
ping 12457 [000] 1584.478959: probe_libc:inet_pton: (3ffb5a347e8)
1347e8 __inet_pton (inlined)
f19d7 gaih_inet.constprop.5 (/usr/lib64/libc-2.24.so)
f4c3f __GI_getaddrinfo (inlined)
410b main (/usr/bin/ping)
Allow __inet_pton listed as inline.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
---
tools/perf/tests/shell/record+probe_libc_inet_pton.sh | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/record+probe_libc_inet_pton.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/record+probe_libc_inet_pton.sh
index 016882d..ee86473 100755
--- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/record+probe_libc_inet_pton.sh
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/record+probe_libc_inet_pton.sh
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ nm -g $libc 2>/dev/null | fgrep -q inet_pton || exit 254
trace_libc_inet_pton_backtrace() {
idx=0
expected[0]="ping[][0-9 \.:]+probe_libc:inet_pton: \([[:xdigit:]]+\)"
- expected[1]=".*inet_pton[[:space:]]\($libc\)$"
+ expected[1]=".*inet_pton[[:space:]]\($libc|inlined\)$"
case "$(uname -m)" in
s390x)
eventattr='call-graph=dwarf,max-stack=4'
--
2.9.3
next reply other threads:[~2018-05-03 6:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-03 6:58 Thomas Richter [this message]
2018-05-08 14:23 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-05-15 6:39 ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf test: "probe libc's inet_pton" fails on s390 due to missing inline tip-bot for Thomas Richter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180503065837.71043-1-tmricht@linux.ibm.com \
--to=tmricht@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=brueckner@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--subject='Re: [PATCH] perf: test 60 fails on s390 inline missing on s390' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).