LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Cc: Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@bootlin.com>,
davem@davemloft.net, kishon@ti.com, linux@armlinux.org.uk,
gregory.clement@bootlin.com, jason@lakedaemon.net,
sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com,
maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com, miquel.raynal@bootlin.com,
nadavh@marvell.com, stefanc@marvell.com, ymarkman@marvell.com,
mw@semihalf.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 02/13] net: phy: sfp: handle non-wired SFP connectors
Date: Fri, 4 May 2018 19:17:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180504171706.GB17233@lunn.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e338472c-1f26-e49b-9a2d-7942e6ed4288@gmail.com>
On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 10:04:48AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 05/04/2018 06:56 AM, Antoine Tenart wrote:
> > SFP connectors can be solder on a board without having any of their pins
> > (LOS, i2c...) wired. In such cases the SFP link state cannot be guessed,
> > and the overall link status reporting is left to other layers.
> >
> > In order to achieve this, a new SFP_DEV status is added, named UNKNOWN.
> > This mode is set when it is not possible for the SFP code to get the
> > link status and as a result the link status is reported to be always UP
> > from the SFP point of view.
>
> Why represent the SFP in Device Tree then? Why not just declare this is
> a fixed link which would avoid having to introduce this "unknown" state.
Hi Antoine
I agree with Florian here.
It LOS was missing, but i2c worked, i could see some value in using
SFP, or order to be able to read the EEPROM. But if everything is
missing, fixed-link seems a better fit.
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-04 17:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-04 13:56 [PATCH net-next v2 00/13] net: mvpp2: phylink conversion Antoine Tenart
2018-05-04 13:56 ` [PATCH net-next v2 01/13] net: phy: sfp: make the i2c-bus property really optional Antoine Tenart
2018-05-04 17:03 ` Florian Fainelli
2018-05-04 17:19 ` Antoine Tenart
2018-05-04 13:56 ` [PATCH net-next v2 02/13] net: phy: sfp: handle non-wired SFP connectors Antoine Tenart
2018-05-04 17:04 ` Florian Fainelli
2018-05-04 17:17 ` Andrew Lunn [this message]
2018-05-04 17:23 ` Antoine Tenart
2018-05-05 15:39 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2018-05-05 17:48 ` Andrew Lunn
2018-05-08 11:52 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-05-14 9:26 ` Antoine Tenart
2018-05-04 13:56 ` [PATCH net-next v2 03/13] net: phy: sfp: warn the user when no tx_disable pin is available Antoine Tenart
2018-05-04 17:07 ` Florian Fainelli
2018-05-04 17:14 ` Andrew Lunn
2018-05-05 20:38 ` Florian Fainelli
2018-05-05 20:52 ` Andrew Lunn
2018-05-08 12:45 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-05-08 11:53 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-05-04 13:56 ` [PATCH net-next v2 04/13] net: mvpp2: align the ethtool ops definition Antoine Tenart
2018-05-04 13:56 ` [PATCH net-next v2 05/13] net: mvpp2: phylink support Antoine Tenart
2018-05-04 13:56 ` [PATCH net-next v2 06/13] phy: add 2.5G SGMII mode to the phy_mode enum Antoine Tenart
2018-05-08 12:34 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-05-14 8:37 ` Antoine Tenart
2018-05-04 13:56 ` [PATCH net-next v2 07/13] phy: cp110-comphy: 2.5G SGMII mode Antoine Tenart
2018-05-04 13:56 ` [PATCH net-next v2 08/13] net: mvpp2: 1000baseX support Antoine Tenart
2018-05-04 13:56 ` [PATCH net-next v2 09/13] net: mvpp2: 2500baseX support Antoine Tenart
2018-05-04 13:56 ` [PATCH net-next v2 10/13] arm64: dts: marvell: mcbin: add 10G SFP support Antoine Tenart
2018-05-04 13:56 ` [PATCH net-next v2 11/13] arm64: dts: marvell: mcbin: enable the fourth network interface Antoine Tenart
2018-05-04 13:56 ` [PATCH net-next v2 12/13] arm64: dts: marvell: 7040-db: describe the 10G SFP cage Antoine Tenart
2018-05-04 13:56 ` [PATCH net-next v2 13/13] arm64: dts: marvell: 8040-db: describe the 10G SFP cages Antoine Tenart
2018-05-08 3:18 ` [PATCH net-next v2 00/13] net: mvpp2: phylink conversion David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180504171706.GB17233@lunn.ch \
--to=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=antoine.tenart@bootlin.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=gregory.clement@bootlin.com \
--cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=kishon@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=mw@semihalf.com \
--cc=nadavh@marvell.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com \
--cc=stefanc@marvell.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
--cc=ymarkman@marvell.com \
--subject='Re: [PATCH net-next v2 02/13] net: phy: sfp: handle non-wired SFP connectors' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).