LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, aryabinin@virtuozzo.com,
	boqun.feng@gmail.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	dvyukov@google.com, will.deacon@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] locking/atomics: Clean up the atomic.h maze of #defines
Date: Sat, 5 May 2018 11:09:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180505090903.ebsf5vosgwckxooy@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180505084721.GA32344@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>


* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:

> On Sat, May 05, 2018 at 10:11:00AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> > Before:
> > 
> >  #ifndef atomic_fetch_dec_relaxed
> > 
> >  #ifndef atomic_fetch_dec
> >  #define atomic_fetch_dec(v)	        atomic_fetch_sub(1, (v))
> >  #define atomic_fetch_dec_relaxed(v)	atomic_fetch_sub_relaxed(1, (v))
> >  #define atomic_fetch_dec_acquire(v)	atomic_fetch_sub_acquire(1, (v))
> >  #define atomic_fetch_dec_release(v)	atomic_fetch_sub_release(1, (v))
> >  #else /* atomic_fetch_dec */
> >  #define atomic_fetch_dec_relaxed	atomic_fetch_dec
> >  #define atomic_fetch_dec_acquire	atomic_fetch_dec
> >  #define atomic_fetch_dec_release	atomic_fetch_dec
> >  #endif /* atomic_fetch_dec */
> > 
> >  #else /* atomic_fetch_dec_relaxed */
> > 
> >  #ifndef atomic_fetch_dec_acquire
> >  #define atomic_fetch_dec_acquire(...)					\
> > 	__atomic_op_acquire(atomic_fetch_dec, __VA_ARGS__)
> >  #endif
> > 
> >  #ifndef atomic_fetch_dec_release
> >  #define atomic_fetch_dec_release(...)					\
> > 	__atomic_op_release(atomic_fetch_dec, __VA_ARGS__)
> >  #endif
> > 
> >  #ifndef atomic_fetch_dec
> >  #define atomic_fetch_dec(...)						\
> > 	__atomic_op_fence(atomic_fetch_dec, __VA_ARGS__)
> >  #endif
> >  #endif /* atomic_fetch_dec_relaxed */
> > 
> > After:
> > 
> >  #ifndef atomic_fetch_dec_relaxed
> >  # ifndef atomic_fetch_dec
> >  #  define atomic_fetch_dec(v)			atomic_fetch_sub(1, (v))
> >  #  define atomic_fetch_dec_relaxed(v)		atomic_fetch_sub_relaxed(1, (v))
> >  #  define atomic_fetch_dec_acquire(v)		atomic_fetch_sub_acquire(1, (v))
> >  #  define atomic_fetch_dec_release(v)		atomic_fetch_sub_release(1, (v))
> >  # else
> >  #  define atomic_fetch_dec_relaxed		atomic_fetch_dec
> >  #  define atomic_fetch_dec_acquire		atomic_fetch_dec
> >  #  define atomic_fetch_dec_release		atomic_fetch_dec
> >  # endif
> >  #else
> >  # ifndef atomic_fetch_dec_acquire
> >  #  define atomic_fetch_dec_acquire(...)	__atomic_op_acquire(atomic_fetch_dec, __VA_ARGS__)
> >  # endif
> >  # ifndef atomic_fetch_dec_release
> >  #  define atomic_fetch_dec_release(...)	__atomic_op_release(atomic_fetch_dec, __VA_ARGS__)
> >  # endif
> >  # ifndef atomic_fetch_dec
> >  #  define atomic_fetch_dec(...)		__atomic_op_fence(atomic_fetch_dec, __VA_ARGS__)
> >  # endif
> >  #endif
> > 
> > The new variant is readable at a glance, and the hierarchy of defines is very 
> > obvious as well.
> 
> It wraps and looks hideous in my normal setup. And I do detest that indent
> after # thing.

You should use wider terminals if you take a look at such code - there's already 
numerous areas of the kernel that are not readable on 80x25 terminals.

_Please_ try the following experiment, for me:

Enter the 21st century temporarily and widen two of your terminals from 80 cols to 
100 cols - it's only ~20% wider.

Apply the 3 patches I sent and then open the new and the old atomic.h in the two 
terminals and compare them visually.

The new structure is _much_ more compact, it is nicer looking and much more 
readable.

Thanks,

	Ingo

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-05-05  9:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-04 17:39 [PATCH 0/6] arm64: add instrumented atomics Mark Rutland
2018-05-04 17:39 ` [PATCH 1/6] locking/atomic, asm-generic: instrument ordering variants Mark Rutland
2018-05-04 18:01   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-04 18:09     ` Mark Rutland
2018-05-04 18:24       ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-05  9:12         ` Mark Rutland
2018-05-05  8:11       ` [PATCH] locking/atomics: Clean up the atomic.h maze of #defines Ingo Molnar
2018-05-05  8:36         ` [PATCH] locking/atomics: Simplify the op definitions in atomic.h some more Ingo Molnar
2018-05-05  8:54           ` [PATCH] locking/atomics: Combine the atomic_andnot() and atomic64_andnot() API definitions Ingo Molnar
2018-05-06 12:15             ` [tip:locking/core] " tip-bot for Ingo Molnar
2018-05-06 14:15             ` [PATCH] " Andrea Parri
2018-05-06 12:14           ` [tip:locking/core] locking/atomics: Simplify the op definitions in atomic.h some more tip-bot for Ingo Molnar
2018-05-09  7:33             ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-09 13:03               ` Will Deacon
2018-05-15  8:54                 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-05-15  8:35               ` Ingo Molnar
2018-05-15 11:41                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-15 12:13                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-15 15:43                   ` Mark Rutland
2018-05-15 17:10                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-15 17:53                       ` Mark Rutland
2018-05-15 18:11                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-15 18:15                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-15 18:52                             ` Linus Torvalds
2018-05-15 19:39                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-21 17:12                           ` Mark Rutland
2018-05-06 14:12           ` [PATCH] " Andrea Parri
2018-05-06 14:57             ` Ingo Molnar
2018-05-07  9:54               ` Andrea Parri
2018-05-18 18:43               ` Palmer Dabbelt
2018-05-05  8:47         ` [PATCH] locking/atomics: Clean up the atomic.h maze of #defines Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-05  9:04           ` Ingo Molnar
2018-05-05  9:24             ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-05  9:38             ` Ingo Molnar
2018-05-05 10:00               ` [RFC PATCH] locking/atomics/powerpc: Introduce optimized cmpxchg_release() family of APIs for PowerPC Ingo Molnar
2018-05-05 10:26                 ` Boqun Feng
2018-05-06  1:56                 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-05-05 10:16               ` [PATCH] locking/atomics: Clean up the atomic.h maze of #defines Boqun Feng
2018-05-05 10:35                 ` [RFC PATCH] locking/atomics/powerpc: Clarify why the cmpxchg_relaxed() family of APIs falls back to full cmpxchg() Ingo Molnar
2018-05-05 11:28                   ` Boqun Feng
2018-05-05 13:27                     ` [PATCH] locking/atomics/powerpc: Move cmpxchg helpers to asm/cmpxchg.h and define the full set of cmpxchg APIs Ingo Molnar
2018-05-05 14:03                       ` Boqun Feng
2018-05-06 12:11                         ` Ingo Molnar
2018-05-07  1:04                           ` Boqun Feng
2018-05-07  6:50                             ` Ingo Molnar
2018-05-06 12:13                     ` [tip:locking/core] " tip-bot for Boqun Feng
2018-05-07 13:31                       ` [PATCH v2] " Boqun Feng
2018-05-05  9:05           ` [PATCH] locking/atomics: Clean up the atomic.h maze of #defines Dmitry Vyukov
2018-05-05  9:32             ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-07  6:43               ` [RFC PATCH] locking/atomics/x86/64: Clean up and fix details of <asm/atomic64_64.h> Ingo Molnar
2018-05-05  9:09           ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2018-05-05  9:29             ` [PATCH] locking/atomics: Clean up the atomic.h maze of #defines Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-05 10:48               ` [PATCH] locking/atomics: Shorten the __atomic_op() defines to __op() Ingo Molnar
2018-05-05 10:59                 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-05-06 12:15                 ` [tip:locking/core] " tip-bot for Ingo Molnar
2018-05-06 12:14         ` [tip:locking/core] locking/atomics: Clean up the atomic.h maze of #defines tip-bot for Ingo Molnar
2018-05-04 17:39 ` [PATCH 2/6] locking/atomic, asm-generic: instrument atomic*andnot*() Mark Rutland
2018-05-04 17:39 ` [PATCH 3/6] arm64: use <linux/atomic.h> for cmpxchg Mark Rutland
2018-05-04 17:39 ` [PATCH 4/6] arm64: fix assembly constraints " Mark Rutland
2018-05-04 17:39 ` [PATCH 5/6] arm64: use instrumented atomics Mark Rutland
2018-05-04 17:39 ` [PATCH 6/6] arm64: instrument smp_{load_acquire,store_release} Mark Rutland

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180505090903.ebsf5vosgwckxooy@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).