LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Du, Changbin" <changbin.du@intel.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: "Du, Changbin" <changbin.du@intel.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	yamada.masahiro@socionext.com, michal.lkml@markovi.net,
	tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, rdunlap@infradead.org,
	x86@kernel.org, lgirdwood@gmail.com, broonie@kernel.org,
	arnd@arndb.de, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] kernel hacking: new config DEBUG_EXPERIENCE to apply GCC -Og optimization
Date: Sun, 6 May 2018 07:57:26 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180505235725.hglh6u77spw55qa5@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180503102823.5b54cd56@gandalf.local.home>

On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 10:28:23AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 3 May 2018 21:45:46 +0800
> "Du, Changbin" <changbin.du@intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > > With that gcc comment, I still think CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_DEBUG is more
> > > inline with what it is and understandable than
> > > CONFIG_DEBUG_EXPERIENCE. The "OPTIMIZE" is the key word there.
> > > 
> > > -- Steve  
> > What about CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_DEBUGGING? We alreay have
> > CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE and CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_PERFORMANCE.
> 
> Yes I like that much better.
> 
> > 
> > And do we need to move it to existing configuration menu "General setup->
> > Compiler optimization level"? But I also want it appear in "kernel hacking"
> > since this is a debug option.
> 
> I understand why you would want it by debugging, but I think it does
> make more sense to be included with the above two other options, as
> they are all mutually exclusive.
> 
> This brings up the topic of creating config paradigms. That is, a way
> of saying "I want a debug kernel" and select one option that selects
> everything you would expect. Or perhaps we should have a:
> 
>  make debug_config
> 
Agree, I accomplish this by running script scripts/kconfig/merge_config.sh.

> that does it.
> 
> But that's a different topic. For now, I would just included it in
> init/Kconfig, and not worry about it not showing up in kernel hacking.
> 
> 
> -- Steve

-- 
Thanks,
Changbin Du

  reply	other threads:[~2018-05-06  0:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-02 13:44 [PATCH v2 0/5] kernel hacking: GCC optimization for debug experience (-Og) changbin.du
2018-05-02 13:44 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] x86/mm: surround level4_kernel_pgt with #ifdef CONFIG_X86_5LEVEL...#endif changbin.du
2018-05-02 13:44 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] regulator: add dummy function of_find_regulator_by_node changbin.du
2018-05-02 13:44 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] kernel hacking: new config NO_AUTO_INLINE to disable compiler auto-inline optimizations changbin.du
2018-05-02 14:07   ` Steven Rostedt
2018-05-02 20:27   ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-05-03 13:00     ` Du, Changbin
2018-05-03 14:16       ` Steven Rostedt
2018-05-02 13:44 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] kernel hacking: new config DEBUG_EXPERIENCE to apply GCC -Og optimization changbin.du
2018-05-02 14:17   ` Steven Rostedt
2018-05-02 20:45     ` Andrew Morton
2018-05-03  1:19       ` Steven Rostedt
2018-05-03 13:45         ` Du, Changbin
2018-05-03 14:28           ` Steven Rostedt
2018-05-05 23:57             ` Du, Changbin [this message]
2018-05-06  0:27               ` Randy Dunlap
2018-05-02 19:26   ` Randy Dunlap
2018-05-02 13:45 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] asm-generic: fix build error in fix_to_virt with CONFIG_DEBUG_EXPERIENCE changbin.du
2018-05-02 14:19   ` Steven Rostedt
2018-05-03 13:25     ` Du, Changbin
2018-05-03 14:19       ` Steven Rostedt
2018-05-03 16:39         ` weylin
2018-05-02 14:56 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] kernel hacking: GCC optimization for debug experience (-Og) Daniel Thompson
2018-05-03 13:49   ` Du, Changbin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180505235725.hglh6u77spw55qa5@intel.com \
    --to=changbin.du@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michal.lkml@markovi.net \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] kernel hacking: new config DEBUG_EXPERIENCE to apply GCC -Og optimization' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).