LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
To: syzbot <syzbot+a9a45987b8b2daabdc88@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
Cc: adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com,
	syzkaller@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: kernel panic: EXT4-fs (device loop0): panic forced after error
Date: Sat, 5 May 2018 22:24:28 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180506022428.GQ29205@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <000000000000019f50056b7f0890@google.com>

On Sat, May 05, 2018 at 05:57:02PM -0700, syzbot wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> syzbot found the following crash on:
> 
> EXT4-fs error (device loop0): ext4_iget:4756: inode #2: comm
> syz-executor909: root inode unallocated
> Kernel panic - not syncing: EXT4-fs (device loop0): panic forced after error

I don't get why syzbot considers this a bug.  It created a corrupted
file system, mounted it as root, and said file system had the flag
which says, "panic if you find a file system corruption".

In what world is this a security bug?  There's a *reason* why I've
always said people who want to containers to be allowed to mount
arbitrary file systems controlled by potentially malicious container
users are insane....

I could mark this as a one-off invalid bug, but if syzkaller is going
to be generating classes of corrupted file systems like this, and are
going to be complaing about how this causes the kernel to crash, then
we have a fundamental syzkaller BUG.

					- Ted

  reply	other threads:[~2018-05-06  2:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-06  0:57 syzbot
2018-05-06  2:24 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o [this message]
2018-05-06  5:03   ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-05-06  9:15     ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-05-06 13:50       ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2018-05-06 13:31     ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2018-05-06 14:40       ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-05-06 20:30         ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2018-05-14  9:12           ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-06-12 14:01             ` Dmitry Vyukov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180506022428.GQ29205@thunk.org \
    --to=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=syzbot+a9a45987b8b2daabdc88@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=syzkaller@googlegroups.com \
    --subject='Re: kernel panic: EXT4-fs (device loop0): panic forced after error' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).