From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752726AbeEGTHb (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 May 2018 15:07:31 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:36598 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751976AbeEGTH3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 May 2018 15:07:29 -0400 Date: Mon, 7 May 2018 16:07:27 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: "Liang, Kan" Cc: Jiri Olsa , mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, namhyung@kernel.org, ganapatrao.kulkarni@cavium.com, zhangshaokun@hisilicon.com, yao.jin@linux.intel.com, will.deacon@arm.com, ak@linux.intel.com, agustinv@codeaurora.org Subject: Re: [V5 PATCH] perf parse-events: Specially handle uncore event alias in small groups Message-ID: <20180507190727.GC13491@kernel.org> References: <1525185096-13477-1-git-send-email-kan.liang@linux.intel.com> <20180501163340.GB11539@krava> <1c2fc5c1-2ad1-8caf-eac6-f08b5f42d7fc@linux.intel.com> <20180504182116.GA32709@kernel.org> <20180507183930.GA13491@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Url: http://acmel.wordpress.com User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Em Mon, May 07, 2018 at 03:06:18PM -0400, Liang, Kan escreveu: > On 5/7/2018 2:39 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > Em Fri, May 04, 2018 at 03:21:16PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu: > > > Em Fri, May 04, 2018 at 01:57:33PM -0400, Liang, Kan escreveu: > > > > On 5/1/2018 12:33 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote: > > > > > Acked-by: Jiri Olsa > > > > > > Thanks Jirka. > > > > > > Are you OK with the patch? > > > > It looks like Jirka has another patch which will touch the same code. > > > > If it's OK for you, could you please merge the patch? So he can do the > > > > changes on top of this patch. > > > Yeah, I'm applying to my perf/core branch and pushing it out now. > > > > So, this will probably break when merging with perf/urgent due to the > > revert of a patch that touches the parser files, just a heads out. > Yes, it probably be a conflict. > Do you want me to send a re-base version of this patch after the revert? That would be nice, please do so. - Arnaldo