LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Wenwen Wang <wang6495@umn.edu>
Cc: "open list:STAGING SUBSYSTEM" <devel@driverdev.osuosl.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Kangjie Lu <kjlu@umn.edu>,
"open list:STAGING - ATOMISP DRIVER"
<linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: staging: atomisp: fix a potential missing-check bug
Date: Tue, 8 May 2018 15:16:35 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180508121635.mdw4jikv66iyprie@mwanda> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1525300731-27324-1-git-send-email-wang6495@umn.edu>
On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 05:38:49PM -0500, Wenwen Wang wrote:
> At the end of atomisp_subdev_set_selection(), the function
> atomisp_subdev_get_rect() is invoked to get the pointer to v4l2_rect. Since
> this function may return a NULL pointer, it is firstly invoked to check
> the returned pointer. If the returned pointer is not NULL, then the
> function is invoked again to obtain the pointer and the memory content
> at the location of the returned pointer is copied to the memory location of
> r. In most cases, the pointers returned by the two invocations are same.
> However, given that the pointer returned by the function
> atomisp_subdev_get_rect() is not a constant, it is possible that the two
> invocations return two different pointers. For example, another thread may
> race to modify the related pointers during the two invocations.
You're assuming a very serious race condition exists.
> In that
> case, even if the first returned pointer is not null, the second returned
> pointer might be null, which will cause issues such as null pointer
> dereference.
And then complaining that if a really serious bug exists then this very
minor bug would exist too... If there were really a race condition like
that then we'd want to fix it instead. In other words, this is not a
real life bug fix.
But it would be fine as a readability or static checker fix so that's
fine.
regards,
dan carpenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-08 12:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-02 22:38 Wenwen Wang
2018-05-08 12:16 ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
2018-05-08 13:04 ` Wenwen Wang
2018-05-08 13:26 ` Sakari Ailus
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-05-04 7:29 Wenwen Wang
2018-05-04 13:53 ` Andy Shevchenko
2018-04-28 23:02 Wenwen Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180508121635.mdw4jikv66iyprie@mwanda \
--to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=alan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hans.verkuil@cisco.com \
--cc=kjlu@umn.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=wang6495@umn.edu \
--subject='Re: [PATCH] media: staging: atomisp: fix a potential missing-check bug' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).