LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] Documentation: refcount-vs-atomic: Update reference to LKMM doc.
@ 2018-05-04 21:11 Andrea Parri
2018-05-04 21:13 ` Kees Cook
2018-05-08 20:52 ` Jonathan Corbet
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andrea Parri @ 2018-05-04 21:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jonathan Corbet
Cc: Kees Cook, Elena Reshetova, linux-doc, linux-kernel, Andrea Parri
The LKMM project has moved to 'tools/memory-model/'.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com>
---
Documentation/core-api/refcount-vs-atomic.rst | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/refcount-vs-atomic.rst b/Documentation/core-api/refcount-vs-atomic.rst
index 83351c258cdb9..322851bada167 100644
--- a/Documentation/core-api/refcount-vs-atomic.rst
+++ b/Documentation/core-api/refcount-vs-atomic.rst
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ in order to help maintainers validate their code against the change in
these memory ordering guarantees.
The terms used through this document try to follow the formal LKMM defined in
-github.com/aparri/memory-model/blob/master/Documentation/explanation.txt
+tools/memory-model/Documentation/explanation.txt.
memory-barriers.txt and atomic_t.txt provide more background to the
memory ordering in general and for atomic operations specifically.
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Documentation: refcount-vs-atomic: Update reference to LKMM doc.
2018-05-04 21:11 [PATCH] Documentation: refcount-vs-atomic: Update reference to LKMM doc Andrea Parri
@ 2018-05-04 21:13 ` Kees Cook
2018-05-04 21:37 ` Andrea Parri
2018-05-08 20:52 ` Jonathan Corbet
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Kees Cook @ 2018-05-04 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrea Parri; +Cc: Jonathan Corbet, Elena Reshetova, linux-doc, LKML
On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 2:11 PM, Andrea Parri
<andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com> wrote:
> The LKMM project has moved to 'tools/memory-model/'.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com>
> ---
> Documentation/core-api/refcount-vs-atomic.rst | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/refcount-vs-atomic.rst b/Documentation/core-api/refcount-vs-atomic.rst
> index 83351c258cdb9..322851bada167 100644
> --- a/Documentation/core-api/refcount-vs-atomic.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/core-api/refcount-vs-atomic.rst
> @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ in order to help maintainers validate their code against the change in
> these memory ordering guarantees.
>
> The terms used through this document try to follow the formal LKMM defined in
> -github.com/aparri/memory-model/blob/master/Documentation/explanation.txt
> +tools/memory-model/Documentation/explanation.txt.
>
> memory-barriers.txt and atomic_t.txt provide more background to the
> memory ordering in general and for atomic operations specifically.
Will this get linkified by rst ?
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Pixel Security
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Documentation: refcount-vs-atomic: Update reference to LKMM doc.
2018-05-04 21:13 ` Kees Cook
@ 2018-05-04 21:37 ` Andrea Parri
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andrea Parri @ 2018-05-04 21:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kees Cook; +Cc: Jonathan Corbet, Elena Reshetova, linux-doc, LKML
On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 02:13:59PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 2:11 PM, Andrea Parri
> <andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com> wrote:
> > The LKMM project has moved to 'tools/memory-model/'.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com>
> > ---
> > Documentation/core-api/refcount-vs-atomic.rst | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/refcount-vs-atomic.rst b/Documentation/core-api/refcount-vs-atomic.rst
> > index 83351c258cdb9..322851bada167 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/core-api/refcount-vs-atomic.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/core-api/refcount-vs-atomic.rst
> > @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ in order to help maintainers validate their code against the change in
> > these memory ordering guarantees.
> >
> > The terms used through this document try to follow the formal LKMM defined in
> > -github.com/aparri/memory-model/blob/master/Documentation/explanation.txt
> > +tools/memory-model/Documentation/explanation.txt.
> >
> > memory-barriers.txt and atomic_t.txt provide more background to the
> > memory ordering in general and for atomic operations specifically.
>
> Will this get linkified by rst ?
I believe not, but I'm not too familiar with rst... FWIW, I'm seeing that
the above memory-barriers.txt, atomic_t.txt are not linkified.
Andrea
>
> -Kees
>
> --
> Kees Cook
> Pixel Security
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Documentation: refcount-vs-atomic: Update reference to LKMM doc.
2018-05-04 21:11 [PATCH] Documentation: refcount-vs-atomic: Update reference to LKMM doc Andrea Parri
2018-05-04 21:13 ` Kees Cook
@ 2018-05-08 20:52 ` Jonathan Corbet
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Corbet @ 2018-05-08 20:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrea Parri; +Cc: Kees Cook, Elena Reshetova, linux-doc, linux-kernel
On Fri, 4 May 2018 23:11:49 +0200
Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com> wrote:
> The LKMM project has moved to 'tools/memory-model/'.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com>
Applied, thanks.
jon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-05-08 20:53 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-05-04 21:11 [PATCH] Documentation: refcount-vs-atomic: Update reference to LKMM doc Andrea Parri
2018-05-04 21:13 ` Kees Cook
2018-05-04 21:37 ` Andrea Parri
2018-05-08 20:52 ` Jonathan Corbet
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).