LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 00/13] [v4] x86, pkeys: two protection keys bug fixes
@ 2018-05-09 17:13 Dave Hansen
  2018-05-09 17:13 ` [PATCH 01/13] x86/pkeys/selftests: Give better unexpected fault error messages Dave Hansen
                   ` (13 more replies)
  0 siblings, 14 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: Dave Hansen @ 2018-05-09 17:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel
  Cc: linux-mm, Dave Hansen, linuxram, tglx, dave.hansen, mpe, mingo,
	akpm, shuah, shakeelb

Hi x86 maintainers,

This set has been seen quite a few changes and additions since the
last post.  Details below.

Changes from v3:
 * Reordered patches following Ingo's recommendations: Introduce
   failing selftests first, then the kernel code to fix the test
   failure.
 * Increase verbosity and accuracy of do_not_expect_pk_fault()
   messages.
 * Removed abort() use from tests.  Crashing is not nice.
 * Remove some dead debugging code, fixing dprint_in_signal.
 * Fix deadlocks from using printf() and friends in signal
   handlers.

Changes from v2:
 * Clarified commit message in patch 1/9 taking some feedback from
   Shuah.

Changes from v1:
 * Added Fixes: and cc'd stable.  No code changes.

--

This fixes two bugs, and adds selftests to make sure they stay fixed:

1. pkey 0 was not usable via mprotect_pkey() because it had never
   been explicitly allocated.
2. mprotect(PROT_EXEC) memory could sometimes be left with the
   implicit exec-only protection key assigned.

I already posted #1 previously.  I'm including them both here because
I don't think it's been picked up in case folks want to pull these
all in a single bundle.

Dave Hansen (13):
      x86/pkeys/selftests: give better unexpected fault error messages
      x86/pkeys/selftests: Stop using assert()
      x86/pkeys/selftests: remove dead debugging code, fix dprint_in_signal
      x86/pkeys/selftests: avoid printf-in-signal deadlocks
      x86/pkeys/selftests: Allow faults on unknown keys
      x86/pkeys/selftests: Factor out "instruction page"
      x86/pkeys/selftests: Add PROT_EXEC test
      x86/pkeys/selftests: Fix pkey exhaustion test off-by-one
      x86/pkeys: Override pkey when moving away from PROT_EXEC
      x86/pkeys/selftests: Fix pointer math
      x86/pkeys/selftests: Save off 'prot' for allocations
      x86/pkeys/selftests: Add a test for pkey 0
      x86/pkeys: Do not special case protection key 0

 arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h            |   2 +-
 arch/x86/include/asm/pkeys.h                  |  18 +-
 arch/x86/mm/pkeys.c                           |  21 +-
 tools/testing/selftests/x86/pkey-helpers.h    |  20 +-
 tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c | 187 +++++++++++++-----
 5 files changed, 173 insertions(+), 75 deletions(-)

Cc: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Michael Ellermen <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>p
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 01/13] x86/pkeys/selftests: Give better unexpected fault error messages
  2018-05-09 17:13 [PATCH 00/13] [v4] x86, pkeys: two protection keys bug fixes Dave Hansen
@ 2018-05-09 17:13 ` Dave Hansen
  2018-05-14 12:40   ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Dave Hansen
  2018-05-09 17:13 ` [PATCH 02/13] x86/pkeys/selftests: Stop using assert() Dave Hansen
                   ` (12 subsequent siblings)
  13 siblings, 1 reply; 33+ messages in thread
From: Dave Hansen @ 2018-05-09 17:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel
  Cc: linux-mm, Dave Hansen, linuxram, tglx, dave.hansen, mpe, mingo,
	akpm, shuah


From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>

do_not_expect_pk_fault() is a helper that we call when we do not expect
a PK fault to have occurred.  But, it is a function, which means that
it obscures the line numbers from pkey_assert().  It also gives no
details.

Replace it with an implementation that gives nice line numbers and
also lets callers pass in a more descriptive message about what
happened that caused the unexpected fault.

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Michael Ellermen <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
---

 b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c |   13 +++++++------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff -puN tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c~pkeys-selftests-give-better-pkey-fault-errors tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c~pkeys-selftests-give-better-pkey-fault-errors	2018-05-09 09:20:18.202698408 -0700
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c	2018-05-09 09:20:18.205698408 -0700
@@ -939,10 +939,11 @@ void expected_pk_fault(int pkey)
 	last_si_pkey = -1;
 }
 
-void do_not_expect_pk_fault(void)
-{
-	pkey_assert(last_pkru_faults == pkru_faults);
-}
+#define do_not_expect_pk_fault(msg)	do {			\
+	if (last_pkru_faults != pkru_faults)			\
+		dprintf0("unexpected PK fault: %s\n", msg);	\
+	pkey_assert(last_pkru_faults == pkru_faults);		\
+} while (0)
 
 int test_fds[10] = { -1 };
 int nr_test_fds;
@@ -1228,7 +1229,7 @@ void test_ptrace_of_child(int *ptr, u16
 	pkey_assert(ret != -1);
 	/* Now access from the current task, and expect NO exception: */
 	peek_result = read_ptr(plain_ptr);
-	do_not_expect_pk_fault();
+	do_not_expect_pk_fault("read plain pointer after ptrace");
 
 	ret = ptrace(PTRACE_DETACH, child_pid, ignored, 0);
 	pkey_assert(ret != -1);
@@ -1272,7 +1273,7 @@ void test_executing_on_unreadable_memory
 	 */
 	madvise(p1, PAGE_SIZE, MADV_DONTNEED);
 	lots_o_noops_around_write(&scratch);
-	do_not_expect_pk_fault();
+	do_not_expect_pk_fault("executing on PROT_EXEC memory");
 	ptr_contents = read_ptr(p1);
 	dprintf2("ptr (%p) contents@%d: %x\n", p1, __LINE__, ptr_contents);
 	expected_pk_fault(pkey);
_

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 02/13] x86/pkeys/selftests: Stop using assert()
  2018-05-09 17:13 [PATCH 00/13] [v4] x86, pkeys: two protection keys bug fixes Dave Hansen
  2018-05-09 17:13 ` [PATCH 01/13] x86/pkeys/selftests: Give better unexpected fault error messages Dave Hansen
@ 2018-05-09 17:13 ` Dave Hansen
  2018-05-14 12:41   ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Dave Hansen
  2018-05-09 17:13 ` [PATCH 03/13] x86/pkeys/selftests: Remove dead debugging code, fix dprint_in_signal Dave Hansen
                   ` (11 subsequent siblings)
  13 siblings, 1 reply; 33+ messages in thread
From: Dave Hansen @ 2018-05-09 17:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel
  Cc: linux-mm, Dave Hansen, linuxram, tglx, dave.hansen, mpe, mingo,
	akpm, shuah


From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>

If we use assert(), the program "crashes".  That can be scary to users,
so stop doing it.  Just exit with a >0 exit code instead.

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Michael Ellermen <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
---

 b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c |   12 ++++++++----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff -puN tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c~pkeys-selftests-do-not-assert tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c~pkeys-selftests-do-not-assert	2018-05-09 09:20:18.717698407 -0700
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c	2018-05-09 09:20:18.720698407 -0700
@@ -72,10 +72,9 @@ extern void abort_hooks(void);
 				test_nr, iteration_nr);	\
 		dprintf0("errno at assert: %d", errno);	\
 		abort_hooks();			\
-		assert(condition);		\
+		exit(__LINE__);			\
 	}					\
 } while (0)
-#define raw_assert(cond) assert(cond)
 
 void cat_into_file(char *str, char *file)
 {
@@ -87,12 +86,17 @@ void cat_into_file(char *str, char *file
 	 * these need to be raw because they are called under
 	 * pkey_assert()
 	 */
-	raw_assert(fd >= 0);
+	if (fd < 0) {
+		fprintf(stderr, "error opening '%s'\n", str);
+		perror("error: ");
+		exit(__LINE__);
+	}
+
 	ret = write(fd, str, strlen(str));
 	if (ret != strlen(str)) {
 		perror("write to file failed");
 		fprintf(stderr, "filename: '%s' str: '%s'\n", file, str);
-		raw_assert(0);
+		exit(__LINE__);
 	}
 	close(fd);
 }
_

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 03/13] x86/pkeys/selftests: Remove dead debugging code, fix dprint_in_signal
  2018-05-09 17:13 [PATCH 00/13] [v4] x86, pkeys: two protection keys bug fixes Dave Hansen
  2018-05-09 17:13 ` [PATCH 01/13] x86/pkeys/selftests: Give better unexpected fault error messages Dave Hansen
  2018-05-09 17:13 ` [PATCH 02/13] x86/pkeys/selftests: Stop using assert() Dave Hansen
@ 2018-05-09 17:13 ` Dave Hansen
  2018-05-14 12:41   ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Dave Hansen
  2018-05-09 17:13 ` [PATCH 04/13] x86/pkeys/selftests: Avoid printf-in-signal deadlocks Dave Hansen
                   ` (10 subsequent siblings)
  13 siblings, 1 reply; 33+ messages in thread
From: Dave Hansen @ 2018-05-09 17:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel
  Cc: linux-mm, Dave Hansen, linuxram, tglx, dave.hansen, mpe, mingo,
	akpm, shuah


From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>

There is some noisy debug code at the end of the signal handler.  It was
disabled by an early, unconditional "return".  However, that return also
hid a dprint_in_signal=0, which kept dprint_in_signal=1 and effectively
locked us into permanent dprint_in_signal=1 behavior.

Remove the return and the dead code, fixing dprint_in_signal.

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Michael Ellermen <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
---

 b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c |   16 ----------------
 1 file changed, 16 deletions(-)

diff -puN tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c~pkeys-selftests-remove-dead-code-after-return tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c~pkeys-selftests-remove-dead-code-after-return	2018-05-09 09:20:19.228698406 -0700
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c	2018-05-09 09:20:19.232698406 -0700
@@ -315,22 +315,6 @@ void signal_handler(int signum, siginfo_
 	dprintf1("WARNING: set PRKU=0 to allow faulting instruction to continue\n");
 	pkru_faults++;
 	dprintf1("<<<<==================================================\n");
-	return;
-	if (trapno == 14) {
-		fprintf(stderr,
-			"ERROR: In signal handler, page fault, trapno = %d, ip = %016lx\n",
-			trapno, ip);
-		fprintf(stderr, "si_addr %p\n", si->si_addr);
-		fprintf(stderr, "REG_ERR: %lx\n",
-				(unsigned long)uctxt->uc_mcontext.gregs[REG_ERR]);
-		exit(1);
-	} else {
-		fprintf(stderr, "unexpected trap %d! at 0x%lx\n", trapno, ip);
-		fprintf(stderr, "si_addr %p\n", si->si_addr);
-		fprintf(stderr, "REG_ERR: %lx\n",
-				(unsigned long)uctxt->uc_mcontext.gregs[REG_ERR]);
-		exit(2);
-	}
 	dprint_in_signal = 0;
 }
 
_

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 04/13] x86/pkeys/selftests: Avoid printf-in-signal deadlocks
  2018-05-09 17:13 [PATCH 00/13] [v4] x86, pkeys: two protection keys bug fixes Dave Hansen
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2018-05-09 17:13 ` [PATCH 03/13] x86/pkeys/selftests: Remove dead debugging code, fix dprint_in_signal Dave Hansen
@ 2018-05-09 17:13 ` Dave Hansen
  2018-05-14 12:42   ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Dave Hansen
  2018-05-09 17:13 ` [PATCH 05/13] x86/pkeys/selftests: Allow faults on unknown keys Dave Hansen
                   ` (9 subsequent siblings)
  13 siblings, 1 reply; 33+ messages in thread
From: Dave Hansen @ 2018-05-09 17:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel
  Cc: linux-mm, Dave Hansen, linuxram, tglx, dave.hansen, mpe, mingo,
	akpm, shuah


From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>

printf() and friends are unusable in signal handlers.  They deadlock.
The pkey selftest does not do any normal printing in signal handlers,
only extra debugging.  So, just print the format string so we get
*some* output when debugging.

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Michael Ellermen <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
---

 b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/pkey-helpers.h |   20 ++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff -puN tools/testing/selftests/x86/pkey-helpers.h~pkeys-selftests-avoid-print-in-signal-deadlocks tools/testing/selftests/x86/pkey-helpers.h
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/pkey-helpers.h~pkeys-selftests-avoid-print-in-signal-deadlocks	2018-05-09 09:20:19.738698404 -0700
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/pkey-helpers.h	2018-05-09 09:20:19.742698404 -0700
@@ -26,30 +26,26 @@ static inline void sigsafe_printf(const
 {
 	va_list ap;
 
-	va_start(ap, format);
 	if (!dprint_in_signal) {
+		va_start(ap, format);
 		vprintf(format, ap);
+		va_end(ap);
 	} else {
 		int ret;
-		int len = vsnprintf(dprint_in_signal_buffer,
-				    DPRINT_IN_SIGNAL_BUF_SIZE,
-				    format, ap);
 		/*
-		 * len is amount that would have been printed,
-		 * but actual write is truncated at BUF_SIZE.
+		 * No printf() functions are signal-safe.
+		 * They deadlock easily. Write the format
+		 * string to get some output, even if
+		 * incomplete.
 		 */
-		if (len > DPRINT_IN_SIGNAL_BUF_SIZE)
-			len = DPRINT_IN_SIGNAL_BUF_SIZE;
-		ret = write(1, dprint_in_signal_buffer, len);
+		ret = write(1, format, strlen(format));
 		if (ret < 0)
-			abort();
+			exit(1);
 	}
-	va_end(ap);
 }
 #define dprintf_level(level, args...) do {	\
 	if (level <= DEBUG_LEVEL)		\
 		sigsafe_printf(args);		\
-	fflush(NULL);				\
 } while (0)
 #define dprintf0(args...) dprintf_level(0, args)
 #define dprintf1(args...) dprintf_level(1, args)
_

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 05/13] x86/pkeys/selftests: Allow faults on unknown keys
  2018-05-09 17:13 [PATCH 00/13] [v4] x86, pkeys: two protection keys bug fixes Dave Hansen
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2018-05-09 17:13 ` [PATCH 04/13] x86/pkeys/selftests: Avoid printf-in-signal deadlocks Dave Hansen
@ 2018-05-09 17:13 ` Dave Hansen
  2018-05-14 12:42   ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Dave Hansen
  2018-05-09 17:13 ` [PATCH 06/13] x86/pkeys/selftests: Factor out "instruction page" Dave Hansen
                   ` (8 subsequent siblings)
  13 siblings, 1 reply; 33+ messages in thread
From: Dave Hansen @ 2018-05-09 17:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel
  Cc: linux-mm, Dave Hansen, linuxram, tglx, dave.hansen, mpe, mingo,
	akpm, shuah


From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>

The exec-only pkey is allocated inside the kernel and userspace
is not told what it is.  So, allow PK faults to occur that have
an unknown key.

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Michael Ellermen <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
---

 b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c |   10 +++++++++-
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff -puN tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c~pkeys-selftests-unknown-exec-only-key tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c~pkeys-selftests-unknown-exec-only-key	2018-05-09 09:20:20.253698403 -0700
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c	2018-05-09 09:20:20.257698403 -0700
@@ -906,13 +906,21 @@ void *malloc_pkey(long size, int prot, u
 }
 
 int last_pkru_faults;
+#define UNKNOWN_PKEY -2
 void expected_pk_fault(int pkey)
 {
 	dprintf2("%s(): last_pkru_faults: %d pkru_faults: %d\n",
 			__func__, last_pkru_faults, pkru_faults);
 	dprintf2("%s(%d): last_si_pkey: %d\n", __func__, pkey, last_si_pkey);
 	pkey_assert(last_pkru_faults + 1 == pkru_faults);
-	pkey_assert(last_si_pkey == pkey);
+
+       /*
+	* For exec-only memory, we do not know the pkey in
+	* advance, so skip this check.
+	*/
+	if (pkey != UNKNOWN_PKEY)
+		pkey_assert(last_si_pkey == pkey);
+
 	/*
 	 * The signal handler shold have cleared out PKRU to let the
 	 * test program continue.  We now have to restore it.
_

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 06/13] x86/pkeys/selftests: Factor out "instruction page"
  2018-05-09 17:13 [PATCH 00/13] [v4] x86, pkeys: two protection keys bug fixes Dave Hansen
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2018-05-09 17:13 ` [PATCH 05/13] x86/pkeys/selftests: Allow faults on unknown keys Dave Hansen
@ 2018-05-09 17:13 ` Dave Hansen
  2018-05-14 12:43   ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Dave Hansen
  2018-05-09 17:13 ` [PATCH 07/13] x86/pkeys/selftests: Add PROT_EXEC test Dave Hansen
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  13 siblings, 1 reply; 33+ messages in thread
From: Dave Hansen @ 2018-05-09 17:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel
  Cc: linux-mm, Dave Hansen, linuxram, tglx, dave.hansen, mpe, mingo,
	akpm, shuah


From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>

We currently have an execute-only test, but it is for
the explicit mprotect_pkey() interface.  We will soon
add a test for the implicit mprotect(PROT_EXEC)
enterface.  We need this code in both tests.

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Michael Ellermen <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
---

 b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c |   21 +++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff -puN tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c~pkeys-selftests-get_pointer_to_instructions tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c~pkeys-selftests-get_pointer_to_instructions	2018-05-09 09:20:20.764698402 -0700
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c	2018-05-09 09:20:20.767698402 -0700
@@ -1238,12 +1238,9 @@ void test_ptrace_of_child(int *ptr, u16
 	free(plain_ptr_unaligned);
 }
 
-void test_executing_on_unreadable_memory(int *ptr, u16 pkey)
+void *get_pointer_to_instructions(void)
 {
 	void *p1;
-	int scratch;
-	int ptr_contents;
-	int ret;
 
 	p1 = ALIGN_PTR_UP(&lots_o_noops_around_write, PAGE_SIZE);
 	dprintf3("&lots_o_noops: %p\n", &lots_o_noops_around_write);
@@ -1253,7 +1250,23 @@ void test_executing_on_unreadable_memory
 	/* Point 'p1' at the *second* page of the function: */
 	p1 += PAGE_SIZE;
 
+	/*
+	 * Try to ensure we fault this in on next touch to ensure
+	 * we get an instruction fault as opposed to a data one
+	 */
 	madvise(p1, PAGE_SIZE, MADV_DONTNEED);
+
+	return p1;
+}
+
+void test_executing_on_unreadable_memory(int *ptr, u16 pkey)
+{
+	void *p1;
+	int scratch;
+	int ptr_contents;
+	int ret;
+
+	p1 = get_pointer_to_instructions();
 	lots_o_noops_around_write(&scratch);
 	ptr_contents = read_ptr(p1);
 	dprintf2("ptr (%p) contents@%d: %x\n", p1, __LINE__, ptr_contents);
_

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 07/13] x86/pkeys/selftests: Add PROT_EXEC test
  2018-05-09 17:13 [PATCH 00/13] [v4] x86, pkeys: two protection keys bug fixes Dave Hansen
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2018-05-09 17:13 ` [PATCH 06/13] x86/pkeys/selftests: Factor out "instruction page" Dave Hansen
@ 2018-05-09 17:13 ` Dave Hansen
  2018-05-14 12:43   ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Dave Hansen
  2018-05-09 17:13 ` [PATCH 08/13] x86/pkeys/selftests: Fix pkey exhaustion test off-by-one Dave Hansen
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  13 siblings, 1 reply; 33+ messages in thread
From: Dave Hansen @ 2018-05-09 17:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel
  Cc: linux-mm, Dave Hansen, linuxram, tglx, dave.hansen, mpe, mingo,
	akpm, shuah


From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>

Under the covers, implement executable-only memory with
protection keys when userspace calls mprotect(PROT_EXEC).

But, we did not have a selftest for that.  Now we do.

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Michael Ellermen <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
---

 b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c |   44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+)

diff -puN tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c~pkeys-selftests-prot_exec tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c~pkeys-selftests-prot_exec	2018-05-09 09:20:21.273698400 -0700
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c	2018-05-09 09:20:21.276698400 -0700
@@ -1288,6 +1288,49 @@ void test_executing_on_unreadable_memory
 	expected_pk_fault(pkey);
 }
 
+void test_implicit_mprotect_exec_only_memory(int *ptr, u16 pkey)
+{
+	void *p1;
+	int scratch;
+	int ptr_contents;
+	int ret;
+
+	dprintf1("%s() start\n", __func__);
+
+	p1 = get_pointer_to_instructions();
+	lots_o_noops_around_write(&scratch);
+	ptr_contents = read_ptr(p1);
+	dprintf2("ptr (%p) contents@%d: %x\n", p1, __LINE__, ptr_contents);
+
+	/* Use a *normal* mprotect(), not mprotect_pkey(): */
+	ret = mprotect(p1, PAGE_SIZE, PROT_EXEC);
+	pkey_assert(!ret);
+
+	dprintf2("pkru: %x\n", rdpkru());
+
+	/* Make sure this is an *instruction* fault */
+	madvise(p1, PAGE_SIZE, MADV_DONTNEED);
+	lots_o_noops_around_write(&scratch);
+	do_not_expect_pk_fault("executing on PROT_EXEC memory");
+	ptr_contents = read_ptr(p1);
+	dprintf2("ptr (%p) contents@%d: %x\n", p1, __LINE__, ptr_contents);
+	expected_pk_fault(UNKNOWN_PKEY);
+
+	/*
+	 * Put the memory back to non-PROT_EXEC.  Should clear the
+	 * exec-only pkey off the VMA and allow it to be readable
+	 * again.  Go to PROT_NONE first to check for a kernel bug
+	 * that did not clear the pkey when doing PROT_NONE.
+	 */
+	ret = mprotect(p1, PAGE_SIZE, PROT_NONE);
+	pkey_assert(!ret);
+
+	ret = mprotect(p1, PAGE_SIZE, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC);
+	pkey_assert(!ret);
+	ptr_contents = read_ptr(p1);
+	do_not_expect_pk_fault("plain read on recently PROT_EXEC area");
+}
+
 void test_mprotect_pkey_on_unsupported_cpu(int *ptr, u16 pkey)
 {
 	int size = PAGE_SIZE;
@@ -1312,6 +1355,7 @@ void (*pkey_tests[])(int *ptr, u16 pkey)
 	test_kernel_gup_of_access_disabled_region,
 	test_kernel_gup_write_to_write_disabled_region,
 	test_executing_on_unreadable_memory,
+	test_implicit_mprotect_exec_only_memory,
 	test_ptrace_of_child,
 	test_pkey_syscalls_on_non_allocated_pkey,
 	test_pkey_syscalls_bad_args,
_

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 08/13] x86/pkeys/selftests: Fix pkey exhaustion test off-by-one
  2018-05-09 17:13 [PATCH 00/13] [v4] x86, pkeys: two protection keys bug fixes Dave Hansen
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2018-05-09 17:13 ` [PATCH 07/13] x86/pkeys/selftests: Add PROT_EXEC test Dave Hansen
@ 2018-05-09 17:13 ` Dave Hansen
  2018-05-14 12:44   ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Dave Hansen
  2018-05-09 17:13 ` [PATCH 09/13] x86/pkeys: Override pkey when moving away from PROT_EXEC Dave Hansen
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  13 siblings, 1 reply; 33+ messages in thread
From: Dave Hansen @ 2018-05-09 17:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel
  Cc: linux-mm, Dave Hansen, linuxram, tglx, dave.hansen, mpe, mingo,
	akpm, shuah


From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>

In our "exhaust all pkeys" test, we make sure that there
is the expected number available.  Turns out that the
test did not cover the execute-only key, but discussed
it anyway.  It did *not* discuss the test-allocated
key.

Now that we have a test for the mprotect(PROT_EXEC) case,
this off-by-one issue showed itself.  Correct the off-by-
one and add the explanation for the case we missed.

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Michael Ellermen <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
---

 b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c |   13 ++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff -puN tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c~pkeys-selftests-exhaust-off-by-one tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c~pkeys-selftests-exhaust-off-by-one	2018-05-09 09:20:21.786698399 -0700
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c	2018-05-09 09:20:21.790698399 -0700
@@ -1148,12 +1148,15 @@ void test_pkey_alloc_exhaust(int *ptr, u
 	pkey_assert(i < NR_PKEYS*2);
 
 	/*
-	 * There are 16 pkeys supported in hardware.  One is taken
-	 * up for the default (0) and another can be taken up by
-	 * an execute-only mapping.  Ensure that we can allocate
-	 * at least 14 (16-2).
+	 * There are 16 pkeys supported in hardware.  Three are
+	 * allocated by the time we get here:
+	 *   1. The default key (0)
+	 *   2. One possibly consumed by an execute-only mapping.
+	 *   3. One allocated by the test code and passed in via
+	 *      'pkey' to this function.
+	 * Ensure that we can allocate at least another 13 (16-3).
 	 */
-	pkey_assert(i >= NR_PKEYS-2);
+	pkey_assert(i >= NR_PKEYS-3);
 
 	for (i = 0; i < nr_allocated_pkeys; i++) {
 		err = sys_pkey_free(allocated_pkeys[i]);
_

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 09/13] x86/pkeys: Override pkey when moving away from PROT_EXEC
  2018-05-09 17:13 [PATCH 00/13] [v4] x86, pkeys: two protection keys bug fixes Dave Hansen
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2018-05-09 17:13 ` [PATCH 08/13] x86/pkeys/selftests: Fix pkey exhaustion test off-by-one Dave Hansen
@ 2018-05-09 17:13 ` Dave Hansen
  2018-05-14 12:44   ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Dave Hansen
  2018-05-09 17:13 ` [PATCH 10/13] x86/pkeys/selftests: Fix pointer math Dave Hansen
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  13 siblings, 1 reply; 33+ messages in thread
From: Dave Hansen @ 2018-05-09 17:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel
  Cc: linux-mm, Dave Hansen, shakeelb, stable, linuxram, tglx,
	dave.hansen, mpe, mingo, akpm, shuah


From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>

I got a bug report that the following code (roughly) was
causing a SIGSEGV:

	mprotect(ptr, size, PROT_EXEC);
	mprotect(ptr, size, PROT_NONE);
	mprotect(ptr, size, PROT_READ);
	*ptr = 100;

The problem is hit when the mprotect(PROT_EXEC)
is implicitly assigned a protection key to the VMA, and made
that key ACCESS_DENY|WRITE_DENY.  The PROT_NONE mprotect()
failed to remove the protection key, and the PROT_NONE->
PROT_READ left the PTE usable, but the pkey still in place
and left the memory inaccessible.

To fix this, we ensure that we always "override" the pkee
at mprotect() if the VMA does not have execute-only
permissions, but the VMA has the execute-only pkey.

We had a check for PROT_READ/WRITE, but it did not work
for PROT_NONE.  This entirely removes the PROT_* checks,
which ensures that PROT_NONE now works.

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Fixes: 62b5f7d013f ("mm/core, x86/mm/pkeys: Add execute-only protection keys support")
Reported-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Michael Ellermen <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
---

 b/arch/x86/include/asm/pkeys.h |   12 +++++++++++-
 b/arch/x86/mm/pkeys.c          |   21 +++++++++++----------
 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff -puN arch/x86/include/asm/pkeys.h~pkeys-abandon-exec-only-pkey-more-aggressively arch/x86/include/asm/pkeys.h
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/pkeys.h~pkeys-abandon-exec-only-pkey-more-aggressively	2018-05-09 09:20:22.295698398 -0700
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/pkeys.h	2018-05-09 09:20:22.300698398 -0700
@@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
 #ifndef _ASM_X86_PKEYS_H
 #define _ASM_X86_PKEYS_H
 
+#define ARCH_DEFAULT_PKEY	0
+
 #define arch_max_pkey() (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_OSPKE) ? 16 : 1)
 
 extern int arch_set_user_pkey_access(struct task_struct *tsk, int pkey,
@@ -15,7 +17,7 @@ extern int __execute_only_pkey(struct mm
 static inline int execute_only_pkey(struct mm_struct *mm)
 {
 	if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_OSPKE))
-		return 0;
+		return ARCH_DEFAULT_PKEY;
 
 	return __execute_only_pkey(mm);
 }
@@ -56,6 +58,14 @@ bool mm_pkey_is_allocated(struct mm_stru
 		return false;
 	if (pkey >= arch_max_pkey())
 		return false;
+	/*
+	 * The exec-only pkey is set in the allocation map, but
+	 * is not available to any of the user interfaces like
+	 * mprotect_pkey().
+	 */
+	if (pkey == mm->context.execute_only_pkey)
+		return false;
+
 	return mm_pkey_allocation_map(mm) & (1U << pkey);
 }
 
diff -puN arch/x86/mm/pkeys.c~pkeys-abandon-exec-only-pkey-more-aggressively arch/x86/mm/pkeys.c
--- a/arch/x86/mm/pkeys.c~pkeys-abandon-exec-only-pkey-more-aggressively	2018-05-09 09:20:22.297698398 -0700
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/pkeys.c	2018-05-09 09:20:22.301698398 -0700
@@ -94,26 +94,27 @@ int __arch_override_mprotect_pkey(struct
 	 */
 	if (pkey != -1)
 		return pkey;
-	/*
-	 * Look for a protection-key-drive execute-only mapping
-	 * which is now being given permissions that are not
-	 * execute-only.  Move it back to the default pkey.
-	 */
-	if (vma_is_pkey_exec_only(vma) &&
-	    (prot & (PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE))) {
-		return 0;
-	}
+
 	/*
 	 * The mapping is execute-only.  Go try to get the
 	 * execute-only protection key.  If we fail to do that,
 	 * fall through as if we do not have execute-only
-	 * support.
+	 * support in this mm.
 	 */
 	if (prot == PROT_EXEC) {
 		pkey = execute_only_pkey(vma->vm_mm);
 		if (pkey > 0)
 			return pkey;
+	} else if (vma_is_pkey_exec_only(vma)) {
+		/*
+		 * Protections are *not* PROT_EXEC, but the mapping
+		 * is using the exec-only pkey.  This mapping was
+		 * PROT_EXEC and will no longer be.  Move back to
+		 * the default pkey.
+		 */
+		return ARCH_DEFAULT_PKEY;
 	}
+
 	/*
 	 * This is a vanilla, non-pkey mprotect (or we failed to
 	 * setup execute-only), inherit the pkey from the VMA we
_

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 10/13] x86/pkeys/selftests: Fix pointer math
  2018-05-09 17:13 [PATCH 00/13] [v4] x86, pkeys: two protection keys bug fixes Dave Hansen
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  2018-05-09 17:13 ` [PATCH 09/13] x86/pkeys: Override pkey when moving away from PROT_EXEC Dave Hansen
@ 2018-05-09 17:13 ` Dave Hansen
  2018-05-14 12:45   ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Dave Hansen
  2018-05-09 17:13 ` [PATCH 11/13] x86/pkeys/selftests: Save off 'prot' for allocations Dave Hansen
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  13 siblings, 1 reply; 33+ messages in thread
From: Dave Hansen @ 2018-05-09 17:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel
  Cc: linux-mm, Dave Hansen, linuxram, tglx, dave.hansen, mpe, mingo,
	akpm, shuah


From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>

We dump out the entire area of the siginfo where the si_pkey_ptr is
supposed to be.  But, we do some math on the poitner, which is a u32.
We intended to do byte math, not u32 math on the pointer.

Cast it over to a u8* so it works.

Also, move this block of code to below th si_code check.  It doesn't
hurt anything, but the si_pkey field is gibberish for other signal
types.

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Michael Ellermen <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
---

 b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c |   14 +++++++-------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff -puN tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c~pkeys-selftests-fix-pointer-math tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c~pkeys-selftests-fix-pointer-math	2018-05-09 09:20:22.825698397 -0700
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c	2018-05-09 09:20:22.830698397 -0700
@@ -293,13 +293,6 @@ void signal_handler(int signum, siginfo_
 		dump_mem(pkru_ptr - 128, 256);
 	pkey_assert(*pkru_ptr);
 
-	si_pkey_ptr = (u32 *)(((u8 *)si) + si_pkey_offset);
-	dprintf1("si_pkey_ptr: %p\n", si_pkey_ptr);
-	dump_mem(si_pkey_ptr - 8, 24);
-	siginfo_pkey = *si_pkey_ptr;
-	pkey_assert(siginfo_pkey < NR_PKEYS);
-	last_si_pkey = siginfo_pkey;
-
 	if ((si->si_code == SEGV_MAPERR) ||
 	    (si->si_code == SEGV_ACCERR) ||
 	    (si->si_code == SEGV_BNDERR)) {
@@ -307,6 +300,13 @@ void signal_handler(int signum, siginfo_
 		exit(4);
 	}
 
+	si_pkey_ptr = (u32 *)(((u8 *)si) + si_pkey_offset);
+	dprintf1("si_pkey_ptr: %p\n", si_pkey_ptr);
+	dump_mem((u8 *)si_pkey_ptr - 8, 24);
+	siginfo_pkey = *si_pkey_ptr;
+	pkey_assert(siginfo_pkey < NR_PKEYS);
+	last_si_pkey = siginfo_pkey;
+
 	dprintf1("signal pkru from xsave: %08x\n", *pkru_ptr);
 	/* need __rdpkru() version so we do not do shadow_pkru checking */
 	dprintf1("signal pkru from  pkru: %08x\n", __rdpkru());
_

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 11/13] x86/pkeys/selftests: Save off 'prot' for allocations
  2018-05-09 17:13 [PATCH 00/13] [v4] x86, pkeys: two protection keys bug fixes Dave Hansen
                   ` (9 preceding siblings ...)
  2018-05-09 17:13 ` [PATCH 10/13] x86/pkeys/selftests: Fix pointer math Dave Hansen
@ 2018-05-09 17:13 ` Dave Hansen
  2018-05-14 12:45   ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Dave Hansen
  2018-05-09 17:13 ` [PATCH 12/13] x86/pkeys/selftests: Add a test for pkey 0 Dave Hansen
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  13 siblings, 1 reply; 33+ messages in thread
From: Dave Hansen @ 2018-05-09 17:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel
  Cc: linux-mm, Dave Hansen, linuxram, tglx, dave.hansen, mpe, mingo,
	akpm, shuah


From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>

This makes it possible to to tell what 'prot' a given allocation
is supposed to have.  That way, if we want to change just the
pkey, we know what 'prot' to pass to mprotect_pkey().

Also, keep a record of the most recent allocation so the tests
can easily find it.

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Michael Ellermen <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
---

 b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c |   14 +++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff -puN tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c~pkeys-update-selftests-store-malloc-record tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c~pkeys-update-selftests-store-malloc-record	2018-05-09 09:20:23.340698395 -0700
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c	2018-05-09 09:20:23.344698395 -0700
@@ -662,10 +662,12 @@ int mprotect_pkey(void *ptr, size_t size
 struct pkey_malloc_record {
 	void *ptr;
 	long size;
+	int prot;
 };
 struct pkey_malloc_record *pkey_malloc_records;
+struct pkey_malloc_record *pkey_last_malloc_record;
 long nr_pkey_malloc_records;
-void record_pkey_malloc(void *ptr, long size)
+void record_pkey_malloc(void *ptr, long size, int prot)
 {
 	long i;
 	struct pkey_malloc_record *rec = NULL;
@@ -697,6 +699,8 @@ void record_pkey_malloc(void *ptr, long
 		(int)(rec - pkey_malloc_records), rec, ptr, size);
 	rec->ptr = ptr;
 	rec->size = size;
+	rec->prot = prot;
+	pkey_last_malloc_record = rec;
 	nr_pkey_malloc_records++;
 }
 
@@ -741,7 +745,7 @@ void *malloc_pkey_with_mprotect(long siz
 	pkey_assert(ptr != (void *)-1);
 	ret = mprotect_pkey((void *)ptr, PAGE_SIZE, prot, pkey);
 	pkey_assert(!ret);
-	record_pkey_malloc(ptr, size);
+	record_pkey_malloc(ptr, size, prot);
 	rdpkru();
 
 	dprintf1("%s() for pkey %d @ %p\n", __func__, pkey, ptr);
@@ -762,7 +766,7 @@ void *malloc_pkey_anon_huge(long size, i
 	size = ALIGN_UP(size, HPAGE_SIZE * 2);
 	ptr = mmap(NULL, size, PROT_NONE, MAP_ANONYMOUS|MAP_PRIVATE, -1, 0);
 	pkey_assert(ptr != (void *)-1);
-	record_pkey_malloc(ptr, size);
+	record_pkey_malloc(ptr, size, prot);
 	mprotect_pkey(ptr, size, prot, pkey);
 
 	dprintf1("unaligned ptr: %p\n", ptr);
@@ -835,7 +839,7 @@ void *malloc_pkey_hugetlb(long size, int
 	pkey_assert(ptr != (void *)-1);
 	mprotect_pkey(ptr, size, prot, pkey);
 
-	record_pkey_malloc(ptr, size);
+	record_pkey_malloc(ptr, size, prot);
 
 	dprintf1("mmap()'d hugetlbfs for pkey %d @ %p\n", pkey, ptr);
 	return ptr;
@@ -857,7 +861,7 @@ void *malloc_pkey_mmap_dax(long size, in
 
 	mprotect_pkey(ptr, size, prot, pkey);
 
-	record_pkey_malloc(ptr, size);
+	record_pkey_malloc(ptr, size, prot);
 
 	dprintf1("mmap()'d for pkey %d @ %p\n", pkey, ptr);
 	close(fd);
_

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 12/13] x86/pkeys/selftests: Add a test for pkey 0
  2018-05-09 17:13 [PATCH 00/13] [v4] x86, pkeys: two protection keys bug fixes Dave Hansen
                   ` (10 preceding siblings ...)
  2018-05-09 17:13 ` [PATCH 11/13] x86/pkeys/selftests: Save off 'prot' for allocations Dave Hansen
@ 2018-05-09 17:13 ` Dave Hansen
  2018-05-14 12:46   ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Dave Hansen
  2018-05-09 17:13 ` [PATCH 13/13] x86/pkeys: Do not special case protection key 0 Dave Hansen
  2018-05-14  8:29 ` [PATCH 00/13] [v4] x86, pkeys: two protection keys bug fixes Ingo Molnar
  13 siblings, 1 reply; 33+ messages in thread
From: Dave Hansen @ 2018-05-09 17:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel
  Cc: linux-mm, Dave Hansen, linuxram, tglx, dave.hansen, mpe, mingo,
	akpm, shuah


From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>

Protection key 0 is the default key for all memory and will
not normally come back from pkey_alloc().  But, you might
still want pass it to mprotect_pkey().

This check ensures that you can use pkey 0.

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Michael Ellermen <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
---

 b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c |   30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)

diff -puN tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c~pkeys-update-selftests-with-pkey-0-test tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c~pkeys-update-selftests-with-pkey-0-test	2018-05-09 09:20:23.852698394 -0700
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c	2018-05-09 09:20:23.855698394 -0700
@@ -1169,6 +1169,35 @@ void test_pkey_alloc_exhaust(int *ptr, u
 	}
 }
 
+/*
+ * pkey 0 is special.  It is allocated by default, so you do not
+ * have to call pkey_alloc() to use it first.  Make sure that it
+ * is usable.
+ */
+void test_mprotect_with_pkey_0(int *ptr, u16 pkey)
+{
+	long size;
+	int prot;
+
+	assert(pkey_last_malloc_record);
+	size = pkey_last_malloc_record->size;
+	/*
+	 * This is a bit of a hack.  But mprotect() requires
+	 * huge-page-aligned sizes when operating on hugetlbfs.
+	 * So, make sure that we use something that's a multiple
+	 * of a huge page when we can.
+	 */
+	if (size >= HPAGE_SIZE)
+		size = HPAGE_SIZE;
+	prot = pkey_last_malloc_record->prot;
+
+	/* Use pkey 0 */
+	mprotect_pkey(ptr, size, prot, 0);
+
+	/* Make sure that we can set it back to the original pkey. */
+	mprotect_pkey(ptr, size, prot, pkey);
+}
+
 void test_ptrace_of_child(int *ptr, u16 pkey)
 {
 	__attribute__((__unused__)) int peek_result;
@@ -1363,6 +1392,7 @@ void (*pkey_tests[])(int *ptr, u16 pkey)
 	test_kernel_gup_write_to_write_disabled_region,
 	test_executing_on_unreadable_memory,
 	test_implicit_mprotect_exec_only_memory,
+	test_mprotect_with_pkey_0,
 	test_ptrace_of_child,
 	test_pkey_syscalls_on_non_allocated_pkey,
 	test_pkey_syscalls_bad_args,
_

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 13/13] x86/pkeys: Do not special case protection key 0
  2018-05-09 17:13 [PATCH 00/13] [v4] x86, pkeys: two protection keys bug fixes Dave Hansen
                   ` (11 preceding siblings ...)
  2018-05-09 17:13 ` [PATCH 12/13] x86/pkeys/selftests: Add a test for pkey 0 Dave Hansen
@ 2018-05-09 17:13 ` Dave Hansen
  2018-05-14 12:46   ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Dave Hansen
  2018-05-14  8:29 ` [PATCH 00/13] [v4] x86, pkeys: two protection keys bug fixes Ingo Molnar
  13 siblings, 1 reply; 33+ messages in thread
From: Dave Hansen @ 2018-05-09 17:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel
  Cc: linux-mm, Dave Hansen, stable, linuxram, tglx, dave.hansen, mpe,
	mingo, akpm, shuah


From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>

mm_pkey_is_allocated() treats pkey 0 as unallocated.  That is
inconsistent with the manpages, and also inconsistent with
mm->context.pkey_allocation_map.  Stop special casing it and only
disallow values that are actually bad (< 0).

The end-user visible effect of this is that you can now use
mprotect_pkey() to set pkey=0.

This is a bit nicer than what Ram proposed[1] because it is simpler
and removes special-casing for pkey 0.  On the other hand, it does
allow applications to pkey_free() pkey-0, but that's just a silly
thing to do, so we are not going to protect against it.

The scenario that could happen is similar to what happens if you free
any other pkey that is in use: it might get reallocated later and used
to protect some other data.  The most likely scenario is that pkey-0
comes back from pkey_alloc(), an access-disable or write-disable bit
is set in PKRU for it, and the next stack access will SIGSEGV.  It's
not horribly different from if you mprotect()'d your stack or heap to
be unreadable or unwritable, which is generally very foolish, but also
not explicitly prevented by the kernel.

1. http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1522112702-27853-1-git-send-email-linuxram@us.ibm.com

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Fixes: 58ab9a088dda ("x86/pkeys: Check against max pkey to avoid overflows")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Michael Ellermen <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>p
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
---

 b/arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h |    2 +-
 b/arch/x86/include/asm/pkeys.h       |    6 +++---
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff -puN arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h~x86-pkey-0-default-allocated arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h~x86-pkey-0-default-allocated	2018-05-09 09:20:24.362698393 -0700
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h	2018-05-09 09:20:24.367698393 -0700
@@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ static inline int init_new_context(struc
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_INTEL_MEMORY_PROTECTION_KEYS
 	if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_OSPKE)) {
-		/* pkey 0 is the default and always allocated */
+		/* pkey 0 is the default and allocated implicitly */
 		mm->context.pkey_allocation_map = 0x1;
 		/* -1 means unallocated or invalid */
 		mm->context.execute_only_pkey = -1;
diff -puN arch/x86/include/asm/pkeys.h~x86-pkey-0-default-allocated arch/x86/include/asm/pkeys.h
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/pkeys.h~x86-pkey-0-default-allocated	2018-05-09 09:20:24.364698393 -0700
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/pkeys.h	2018-05-09 09:20:24.367698393 -0700
@@ -51,10 +51,10 @@ bool mm_pkey_is_allocated(struct mm_stru
 {
 	/*
 	 * "Allocated" pkeys are those that have been returned
-	 * from pkey_alloc().  pkey 0 is special, and never
-	 * returned from pkey_alloc().
+	 * from pkey_alloc() or pkey 0 which is allocated
+	 * implicitly when the mm is created.
 	 */
-	if (pkey <= 0)
+	if (pkey < 0)
 		return false;
 	if (pkey >= arch_max_pkey())
 		return false;
_

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 00/13] [v4] x86, pkeys: two protection keys bug fixes
  2018-05-09 17:13 [PATCH 00/13] [v4] x86, pkeys: two protection keys bug fixes Dave Hansen
                   ` (12 preceding siblings ...)
  2018-05-09 17:13 ` [PATCH 13/13] x86/pkeys: Do not special case protection key 0 Dave Hansen
@ 2018-05-14  8:29 ` Ingo Molnar
  2018-05-14  8:47   ` Ingo Molnar
                     ` (2 more replies)
  13 siblings, 3 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2018-05-14  8:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dave Hansen
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, linuxram, tglx, dave.hansen, mpe, akpm,
	shuah, shakeelb


* Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> Hi x86 maintainers,
> 
> This set has been seen quite a few changes and additions since the
> last post.  Details below.
> 
> Changes from v3:
>  * Reordered patches following Ingo's recommendations: Introduce
>    failing selftests first, then the kernel code to fix the test
>    failure.
>  * Increase verbosity and accuracy of do_not_expect_pk_fault()
>    messages.
>  * Removed abort() use from tests.  Crashing is not nice.
>  * Remove some dead debugging code, fixing dprint_in_signal.
>  * Fix deadlocks from using printf() and friends in signal
>    handlers.
> 
> Changes from v2:
>  * Clarified commit message in patch 1/9 taking some feedback from
>    Shuah.
> 
> Changes from v1:
>  * Added Fixes: and cc'd stable.  No code changes.
> 
> --
> 
> This fixes two bugs, and adds selftests to make sure they stay fixed:
> 
> 1. pkey 0 was not usable via mprotect_pkey() because it had never
>    been explicitly allocated.
> 2. mprotect(PROT_EXEC) memory could sometimes be left with the
>    implicit exec-only protection key assigned.
> 
> I already posted #1 previously.  I'm including them both here because
> I don't think it's been picked up in case folks want to pull these
> all in a single bundle.
> 
> Dave Hansen (13):
>       x86/pkeys/selftests: give better unexpected fault error messages
>       x86/pkeys/selftests: Stop using assert()
>       x86/pkeys/selftests: remove dead debugging code, fix dprint_in_signal
>       x86/pkeys/selftests: avoid printf-in-signal deadlocks
>       x86/pkeys/selftests: Allow faults on unknown keys
>       x86/pkeys/selftests: Factor out "instruction page"
>       x86/pkeys/selftests: Add PROT_EXEC test
>       x86/pkeys/selftests: Fix pkey exhaustion test off-by-one
>       x86/pkeys: Override pkey when moving away from PROT_EXEC
>       x86/pkeys/selftests: Fix pointer math
>       x86/pkeys/selftests: Save off 'prot' for allocations
>       x86/pkeys/selftests: Add a test for pkey 0
>       x86/pkeys: Do not special case protection key 0
> 
>  arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h            |   2 +-
>  arch/x86/include/asm/pkeys.h                  |  18 +-
>  arch/x86/mm/pkeys.c                           |  21 +-
>  tools/testing/selftests/x86/pkey-helpers.h    |  20 +-
>  tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c | 187 +++++++++++++-----
>  5 files changed, 173 insertions(+), 75 deletions(-)

So this series is looking good to me in principle, but trying to build it I got 
warnings and errors - see the build log below.

Note that this is on a box with "Ubuntu 18.04 LTS (Bionic Beaver)".

Thanks,

	Ingo

================>

gcc -m32 -o /home/mingo/tip/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys_32 -O2 -g -std=gnu99 -pthread -Wall -no-pie -DCAN_BUILD_32 -DCAN_BUILD_64 protection_keys.c -lrt -ldl -lm
protection_keys.c:232:0: warning: "SEGV_BNDERR" redefined
 #define SEGV_BNDERR     3  /* failed address bound checks */
 
In file included from /usr/include/signal.h:58:0,
                 from protection_keys.c:33:
/usr/include/bits/siginfo-consts.h:117:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition
 #  define SEGV_BNDERR SEGV_BNDERR
 
protection_keys.c:233:0: warning: "SEGV_PKUERR" redefined
 #define SEGV_PKUERR     4
 
In file included from /usr/include/signal.h:58:0,
                 from protection_keys.c:33:
/usr/include/bits/siginfo-consts.h:119:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition
 #  define SEGV_PKUERR SEGV_PKUERR
 
protection_keys.c:387:5: error: conflicting types for ‘pkey_get’
 u32 pkey_get(int pkey, unsigned long flags)
     ^~~~~~~~
In file included from /usr/include/bits/mman-linux.h:115:0,
                 from /usr/include/bits/mman.h:45,
                 from /usr/include/sys/mman.h:41,
                 from protection_keys.c:37:
/usr/include/bits/mman-shared.h:64:5: note: previous declaration of ‘pkey_get’ was here
 int pkey_get (int __key) __THROW;
     ^~~~~~~~
protection_keys.c:409:5: error: conflicting types for ‘pkey_set’
 int pkey_set(int pkey, unsigned long rights, unsigned long flags)
     ^~~~~~~~
In file included from /usr/include/bits/mman-linux.h:115:0,
                 from /usr/include/bits/mman.h:45,
                 from /usr/include/sys/mman.h:41,
                 from protection_keys.c:37:
/usr/include/bits/mman-shared.h:60:5: note: previous declaration of ‘pkey_set’ was here
 int pkey_set (int __key, unsigned int __access_rights) __THROW;
     ^~~~~~~~
Makefile:67: recipe for target '/home/mingo/tip/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys_32' failed
make: *** [/home/mingo/tip/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys_32] Error 1

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 00/13] [v4] x86, pkeys: two protection keys bug fixes
  2018-05-14  8:29 ` [PATCH 00/13] [v4] x86, pkeys: two protection keys bug fixes Ingo Molnar
@ 2018-05-14  8:47   ` Ingo Molnar
  2018-05-14  8:56   ` [PATCH] x86/pkeys/selftests: Adjust the self-test to fresh distros that export the pkeys ABI Ingo Molnar
  2018-05-14  8:59   ` [PATCH] x86/mpx/selftests: Adjust the self-test to fresh distros that export the MPX ABI Ingo Molnar
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2018-05-14  8:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dave Hansen
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, linuxram, tglx, dave.hansen, mpe, akpm,
	shuah, shakeelb


* Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:

> So this series is looking good to me in principle, but trying to build it I got 
> warnings and errors - see the build log below.
> 
> Note that this is on a box with "Ubuntu 18.04 LTS (Bionic Beaver)".

So it turns out that the build errors already exist without the series applied, so 
it must be some interaction between the pkeys self-tests and latest Ubuntu.

Thanks,

	Ingo

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] x86/pkeys/selftests: Adjust the self-test to fresh distros that export the pkeys ABI
  2018-05-14  8:29 ` [PATCH 00/13] [v4] x86, pkeys: two protection keys bug fixes Ingo Molnar
  2018-05-14  8:47   ` Ingo Molnar
@ 2018-05-14  8:56   ` Ingo Molnar
  2018-05-14 12:39     ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Ingo Molnar
  2018-05-14  8:59   ` [PATCH] x86/mpx/selftests: Adjust the self-test to fresh distros that export the MPX ABI Ingo Molnar
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 33+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2018-05-14  8:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dave Hansen
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, linuxram, tglx, dave.hansen, mpe, akpm,
	shuah, shakeelb

Ubuntu 18.04 started exporting pkeys details in header files, resulting
in build failures and warnings in the pkeys self-tests:

  protection_keys.c:232:0: warning: "SEGV_BNDERR" redefined
  protection_keys.c:387:5: error: conflicting types for ‘pkey_get’
  protection_keys.c:409:5: error: conflicting types for ‘pkey_set’
  ...

Fix these namespace conflicts and double definitions, plus also
clean up the ABI definitions to make it all a bit more readable ...

Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
index f15aa5a76fe3..bbe80a5c31c7 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
@@ -191,26 +191,30 @@ void lots_o_noops_around_write(int *write_to_me)
 #ifdef __i386__
 
 #ifndef SYS_mprotect_key
-# define SYS_mprotect_key 380
+# define SYS_mprotect_key	380
 #endif
+
 #ifndef SYS_pkey_alloc
-# define SYS_pkey_alloc	 381
-# define SYS_pkey_free	 382
+# define SYS_pkey_alloc		381
+# define SYS_pkey_free		382
 #endif
-#define REG_IP_IDX REG_EIP
-#define si_pkey_offset 0x14
+
+#define REG_IP_IDX		REG_EIP
+#define si_pkey_offset		0x14
 
 #else
 
 #ifndef SYS_mprotect_key
-# define SYS_mprotect_key 329
+# define SYS_mprotect_key	329
 #endif
+
 #ifndef SYS_pkey_alloc
-# define SYS_pkey_alloc	 330
-# define SYS_pkey_free	 331
+# define SYS_pkey_alloc		330
+# define SYS_pkey_free		331
 #endif
-#define REG_IP_IDX REG_RIP
-#define si_pkey_offset 0x20
+
+#define REG_IP_IDX		REG_RIP
+#define si_pkey_offset		0x20
 
 #endif
 
@@ -225,8 +229,14 @@ void dump_mem(void *dumpme, int len_bytes)
 	}
 }
 
-#define SEGV_BNDERR     3  /* failed address bound checks */
-#define SEGV_PKUERR     4
+/* Failed address bound checks: */
+#ifndef SEGV_BNDERR
+# define SEGV_BNDERR		3
+#endif
+
+#ifndef SEGV_PKUERR
+# define SEGV_PKUERR		4
+#endif
 
 static char *si_code_str(int si_code)
 {
@@ -393,10 +403,15 @@ pid_t fork_lazy_child(void)
 	return forkret;
 }
 
-#define PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS    0x1
-#define PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE     0x2
+#ifndef PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS
+# define PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS	0x1
+#endif
+
+#ifndef PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE
+# define PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE	0x2
+#endif
 
-u32 pkey_get(int pkey, unsigned long flags)
+static u32 hw_pkey_get(int pkey, unsigned long flags)
 {
 	u32 mask = (PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS|PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE);
 	u32 pkru = __rdpkru();
@@ -418,7 +433,7 @@ u32 pkey_get(int pkey, unsigned long flags)
 	return masked_pkru;
 }
 
-int pkey_set(int pkey, unsigned long rights, unsigned long flags)
+static int hw_pkey_set(int pkey, unsigned long rights, unsigned long flags)
 {
 	u32 mask = (PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS|PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE);
 	u32 old_pkru = __rdpkru();
@@ -452,15 +467,15 @@ void pkey_disable_set(int pkey, int flags)
 		pkey, flags);
 	pkey_assert(flags & (PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS | PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE));
 
-	pkey_rights = pkey_get(pkey, syscall_flags);
+	pkey_rights = hw_pkey_get(pkey, syscall_flags);
 
-	dprintf1("%s(%d) pkey_get(%d): %x\n", __func__,
+	dprintf1("%s(%d) hw_pkey_get(%d): %x\n", __func__,
 			pkey, pkey, pkey_rights);
 	pkey_assert(pkey_rights >= 0);
 
 	pkey_rights |= flags;
 
-	ret = pkey_set(pkey, pkey_rights, syscall_flags);
+	ret = hw_pkey_set(pkey, pkey_rights, syscall_flags);
 	assert(!ret);
 	/*pkru and flags have the same format */
 	shadow_pkru |= flags << (pkey * 2);
@@ -468,8 +483,8 @@ void pkey_disable_set(int pkey, int flags)
 
 	pkey_assert(ret >= 0);
 
-	pkey_rights = pkey_get(pkey, syscall_flags);
-	dprintf1("%s(%d) pkey_get(%d): %x\n", __func__,
+	pkey_rights = hw_pkey_get(pkey, syscall_flags);
+	dprintf1("%s(%d) hw_pkey_get(%d): %x\n", __func__,
 			pkey, pkey, pkey_rights);
 
 	dprintf1("%s(%d) pkru: 0x%x\n", __func__, pkey, rdpkru());
@@ -483,24 +498,24 @@ void pkey_disable_clear(int pkey, int flags)
 {
 	unsigned long syscall_flags = 0;
 	int ret;
-	int pkey_rights = pkey_get(pkey, syscall_flags);
+	int pkey_rights = hw_pkey_get(pkey, syscall_flags);
 	u32 orig_pkru = rdpkru();
 
 	pkey_assert(flags & (PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS | PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE));
 
-	dprintf1("%s(%d) pkey_get(%d): %x\n", __func__,
+	dprintf1("%s(%d) hw_pkey_get(%d): %x\n", __func__,
 			pkey, pkey, pkey_rights);
 	pkey_assert(pkey_rights >= 0);
 
 	pkey_rights |= flags;
 
-	ret = pkey_set(pkey, pkey_rights, 0);
+	ret = hw_pkey_set(pkey, pkey_rights, 0);
 	/* pkru and flags have the same format */
 	shadow_pkru &= ~(flags << (pkey * 2));
 	pkey_assert(ret >= 0);
 
-	pkey_rights = pkey_get(pkey, syscall_flags);
-	dprintf1("%s(%d) pkey_get(%d): %x\n", __func__,
+	pkey_rights = hw_pkey_get(pkey, syscall_flags);
+	dprintf1("%s(%d) hw_pkey_get(%d): %x\n", __func__,
 			pkey, pkey, pkey_rights);
 
 	dprintf1("%s(%d) pkru: 0x%x\n", __func__, pkey, rdpkru());

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] x86/mpx/selftests: Adjust the self-test to fresh distros that export the MPX ABI
  2018-05-14  8:29 ` [PATCH 00/13] [v4] x86, pkeys: two protection keys bug fixes Ingo Molnar
  2018-05-14  8:47   ` Ingo Molnar
  2018-05-14  8:56   ` [PATCH] x86/pkeys/selftests: Adjust the self-test to fresh distros that export the pkeys ABI Ingo Molnar
@ 2018-05-14  8:59   ` Ingo Molnar
  2018-05-14 12:39     ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Ingo Molnar
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 33+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2018-05-14  8:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dave Hansen
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, linuxram, tglx, dave.hansen, mpe, akpm,
	shuah, shakeelb

Fix this warning:

  mpx-mini-test.c:422:0: warning: "SEGV_BNDERR" redefined

Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/x86/mpx-mini-test.c | 7 +++++--
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/mpx-mini-test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/mpx-mini-test.c
index 9c0325e1ea68..50f7e9272481 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/mpx-mini-test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/mpx-mini-test.c
@@ -368,6 +368,11 @@ static int expected_bnd_index = -1;
 uint64_t shadow_plb[NR_MPX_BOUNDS_REGISTERS][2]; /* shadow MPX bound registers */
 unsigned long shadow_map[NR_MPX_BOUNDS_REGISTERS];
 
+/* Failed address bound checks: */
+#ifndef SEGV_BNDERR
+# define SEGV_BNDERR	3
+#endif
+
 /*
  * The kernel is supposed to provide some information about the bounds
  * exception in the siginfo.  It should match what we have in the bounds
@@ -419,8 +424,6 @@ void handler(int signum, siginfo_t *si, void *vucontext)
 		br_count++;
 		dprintf1("#BR 0x%jx (total seen: %d)\n", status, br_count);
 
-#define SEGV_BNDERR     3  /* failed address bound checks */
-
 		dprintf2("Saw a #BR! status 0x%jx at %016lx br_reason: %jx\n",
 				status, ip, br_reason);
 		dprintf2("si_signo: %d\n", si->si_signo);

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* [tip:x86/urgent] x86/pkeys/selftests: Adjust the self-test to fresh distros that export the pkeys ABI
  2018-05-14  8:56   ` [PATCH] x86/pkeys/selftests: Adjust the self-test to fresh distros that export the pkeys ABI Ingo Molnar
@ 2018-05-14 12:39     ` tip-bot for Ingo Molnar
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: tip-bot for Ingo Molnar @ 2018-05-14 12:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-tip-commits
  Cc: mingo, dave.hansen, hpa, tglx, linux-kernel, torvalds, peterz

Commit-ID:  0fb96620dce351608aa82eed5942e2f58b07beda
Gitweb:     https://git.kernel.org/tip/0fb96620dce351608aa82eed5942e2f58b07beda
Author:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
AuthorDate: Mon, 14 May 2018 10:56:23 +0200
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Mon, 14 May 2018 11:14:45 +0200

x86/pkeys/selftests: Adjust the self-test to fresh distros that export the pkeys ABI

Ubuntu 18.04 started exporting pkeys details in header files, resulting
in build failures and warnings in the pkeys self-tests:

  protection_keys.c:232:0: warning: "SEGV_BNDERR" redefined
  protection_keys.c:387:5: error: conflicting types for ‘pkey_get’
  protection_keys.c:409:5: error: conflicting types for ‘pkey_set’
  ...

Fix these namespace conflicts and double definitions, plus also
clean up the ABI definitions to make it all a bit more readable ...

Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: dave.hansen@intel.com
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: linuxram@us.ibm.com
Cc: mpe@ellerman.id.au
Cc: shakeelb@google.com
Cc: shuah@kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180514085623.GB7094@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
index f15aa5a76fe3..bbe80a5c31c7 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
@@ -191,26 +191,30 @@ void lots_o_noops_around_write(int *write_to_me)
 #ifdef __i386__
 
 #ifndef SYS_mprotect_key
-# define SYS_mprotect_key 380
+# define SYS_mprotect_key	380
 #endif
+
 #ifndef SYS_pkey_alloc
-# define SYS_pkey_alloc	 381
-# define SYS_pkey_free	 382
+# define SYS_pkey_alloc		381
+# define SYS_pkey_free		382
 #endif
-#define REG_IP_IDX REG_EIP
-#define si_pkey_offset 0x14
+
+#define REG_IP_IDX		REG_EIP
+#define si_pkey_offset		0x14
 
 #else
 
 #ifndef SYS_mprotect_key
-# define SYS_mprotect_key 329
+# define SYS_mprotect_key	329
 #endif
+
 #ifndef SYS_pkey_alloc
-# define SYS_pkey_alloc	 330
-# define SYS_pkey_free	 331
+# define SYS_pkey_alloc		330
+# define SYS_pkey_free		331
 #endif
-#define REG_IP_IDX REG_RIP
-#define si_pkey_offset 0x20
+
+#define REG_IP_IDX		REG_RIP
+#define si_pkey_offset		0x20
 
 #endif
 
@@ -225,8 +229,14 @@ void dump_mem(void *dumpme, int len_bytes)
 	}
 }
 
-#define SEGV_BNDERR     3  /* failed address bound checks */
-#define SEGV_PKUERR     4
+/* Failed address bound checks: */
+#ifndef SEGV_BNDERR
+# define SEGV_BNDERR		3
+#endif
+
+#ifndef SEGV_PKUERR
+# define SEGV_PKUERR		4
+#endif
 
 static char *si_code_str(int si_code)
 {
@@ -393,10 +403,15 @@ pid_t fork_lazy_child(void)
 	return forkret;
 }
 
-#define PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS    0x1
-#define PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE     0x2
+#ifndef PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS
+# define PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS	0x1
+#endif
+
+#ifndef PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE
+# define PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE	0x2
+#endif
 
-u32 pkey_get(int pkey, unsigned long flags)
+static u32 hw_pkey_get(int pkey, unsigned long flags)
 {
 	u32 mask = (PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS|PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE);
 	u32 pkru = __rdpkru();
@@ -418,7 +433,7 @@ u32 pkey_get(int pkey, unsigned long flags)
 	return masked_pkru;
 }
 
-int pkey_set(int pkey, unsigned long rights, unsigned long flags)
+static int hw_pkey_set(int pkey, unsigned long rights, unsigned long flags)
 {
 	u32 mask = (PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS|PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE);
 	u32 old_pkru = __rdpkru();
@@ -452,15 +467,15 @@ void pkey_disable_set(int pkey, int flags)
 		pkey, flags);
 	pkey_assert(flags & (PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS | PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE));
 
-	pkey_rights = pkey_get(pkey, syscall_flags);
+	pkey_rights = hw_pkey_get(pkey, syscall_flags);
 
-	dprintf1("%s(%d) pkey_get(%d): %x\n", __func__,
+	dprintf1("%s(%d) hw_pkey_get(%d): %x\n", __func__,
 			pkey, pkey, pkey_rights);
 	pkey_assert(pkey_rights >= 0);
 
 	pkey_rights |= flags;
 
-	ret = pkey_set(pkey, pkey_rights, syscall_flags);
+	ret = hw_pkey_set(pkey, pkey_rights, syscall_flags);
 	assert(!ret);
 	/*pkru and flags have the same format */
 	shadow_pkru |= flags << (pkey * 2);
@@ -468,8 +483,8 @@ void pkey_disable_set(int pkey, int flags)
 
 	pkey_assert(ret >= 0);
 
-	pkey_rights = pkey_get(pkey, syscall_flags);
-	dprintf1("%s(%d) pkey_get(%d): %x\n", __func__,
+	pkey_rights = hw_pkey_get(pkey, syscall_flags);
+	dprintf1("%s(%d) hw_pkey_get(%d): %x\n", __func__,
 			pkey, pkey, pkey_rights);
 
 	dprintf1("%s(%d) pkru: 0x%x\n", __func__, pkey, rdpkru());
@@ -483,24 +498,24 @@ void pkey_disable_clear(int pkey, int flags)
 {
 	unsigned long syscall_flags = 0;
 	int ret;
-	int pkey_rights = pkey_get(pkey, syscall_flags);
+	int pkey_rights = hw_pkey_get(pkey, syscall_flags);
 	u32 orig_pkru = rdpkru();
 
 	pkey_assert(flags & (PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS | PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE));
 
-	dprintf1("%s(%d) pkey_get(%d): %x\n", __func__,
+	dprintf1("%s(%d) hw_pkey_get(%d): %x\n", __func__,
 			pkey, pkey, pkey_rights);
 	pkey_assert(pkey_rights >= 0);
 
 	pkey_rights |= flags;
 
-	ret = pkey_set(pkey, pkey_rights, 0);
+	ret = hw_pkey_set(pkey, pkey_rights, 0);
 	/* pkru and flags have the same format */
 	shadow_pkru &= ~(flags << (pkey * 2));
 	pkey_assert(ret >= 0);
 
-	pkey_rights = pkey_get(pkey, syscall_flags);
-	dprintf1("%s(%d) pkey_get(%d): %x\n", __func__,
+	pkey_rights = hw_pkey_get(pkey, syscall_flags);
+	dprintf1("%s(%d) hw_pkey_get(%d): %x\n", __func__,
 			pkey, pkey, pkey_rights);
 
 	dprintf1("%s(%d) pkru: 0x%x\n", __func__, pkey, rdpkru());

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* [tip:x86/urgent] x86/mpx/selftests: Adjust the self-test to fresh distros that export the MPX ABI
  2018-05-14  8:59   ` [PATCH] x86/mpx/selftests: Adjust the self-test to fresh distros that export the MPX ABI Ingo Molnar
@ 2018-05-14 12:39     ` tip-bot for Ingo Molnar
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: tip-bot for Ingo Molnar @ 2018-05-14 12:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-tip-commits
  Cc: hpa, dave.hansen, torvalds, mingo, linux-kernel, tglx, peterz

Commit-ID:  73bb4d6cd192b8629c5125aaada9892d9fc986b6
Gitweb:     https://git.kernel.org/tip/73bb4d6cd192b8629c5125aaada9892d9fc986b6
Author:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
AuthorDate: Mon, 14 May 2018 10:59:08 +0200
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Mon, 14 May 2018 11:14:45 +0200

x86/mpx/selftests: Adjust the self-test to fresh distros that export the MPX ABI

Fix this warning:

  mpx-mini-test.c:422:0: warning: "SEGV_BNDERR" redefined

Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: dave.hansen@intel.com
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: linuxram@us.ibm.com
Cc: mpe@ellerman.id.au
Cc: shakeelb@google.com
Cc: shuah@kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180514085908.GA12798@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/x86/mpx-mini-test.c | 7 +++++--
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/mpx-mini-test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/mpx-mini-test.c
index 9c0325e1ea68..50f7e9272481 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/mpx-mini-test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/mpx-mini-test.c
@@ -368,6 +368,11 @@ static int expected_bnd_index = -1;
 uint64_t shadow_plb[NR_MPX_BOUNDS_REGISTERS][2]; /* shadow MPX bound registers */
 unsigned long shadow_map[NR_MPX_BOUNDS_REGISTERS];
 
+/* Failed address bound checks: */
+#ifndef SEGV_BNDERR
+# define SEGV_BNDERR	3
+#endif
+
 /*
  * The kernel is supposed to provide some information about the bounds
  * exception in the siginfo.  It should match what we have in the bounds
@@ -419,8 +424,6 @@ void handler(int signum, siginfo_t *si, void *vucontext)
 		br_count++;
 		dprintf1("#BR 0x%jx (total seen: %d)\n", status, br_count);
 
-#define SEGV_BNDERR     3  /* failed address bound checks */
-
 		dprintf2("Saw a #BR! status 0x%jx at %016lx br_reason: %jx\n",
 				status, ip, br_reason);
 		dprintf2("si_signo: %d\n", si->si_signo);

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* [tip:x86/urgent] x86/pkeys/selftests: Give better unexpected fault error messages
  2018-05-09 17:13 ` [PATCH 01/13] x86/pkeys/selftests: Give better unexpected fault error messages Dave Hansen
@ 2018-05-14 12:40   ` tip-bot for Dave Hansen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: tip-bot for Dave Hansen @ 2018-05-14 12:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-tip-commits
  Cc: dave.hansen, mpe, peterz, shuah, dave.hansen, linux-kernel,
	mingo, tglx, torvalds, hpa, akpm, linuxram

Commit-ID:  55556b0b2016806b2e16a20b62d143383983a34a
Gitweb:     https://git.kernel.org/tip/55556b0b2016806b2e16a20b62d143383983a34a
Author:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
AuthorDate: Wed, 9 May 2018 10:13:38 -0700
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Mon, 14 May 2018 11:14:45 +0200

x86/pkeys/selftests: Give better unexpected fault error messages

do_not_expect_pk_fault() is a helper that we call when we do not expect
a PK fault to have occurred.  But, it is a function, which means that
it obscures the line numbers from pkey_assert().  It also gives no
details.

Replace it with an implementation that gives nice line numbers and
also lets callers pass in a more descriptive message about what
happened that caused the unexpected fault.

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michael Ellermen <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180509171338.55D13B64@viggo.jf.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c | 13 +++++++------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
index bbe80a5c31c7..a0f0a732784b 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
@@ -954,10 +954,11 @@ void expected_pk_fault(int pkey)
 	last_si_pkey = -1;
 }
 
-void do_not_expect_pk_fault(void)
-{
-	pkey_assert(last_pkru_faults == pkru_faults);
-}
+#define do_not_expect_pk_fault(msg)	do {			\
+	if (last_pkru_faults != pkru_faults)			\
+		dprintf0("unexpected PK fault: %s\n", msg);	\
+	pkey_assert(last_pkru_faults == pkru_faults);		\
+} while (0)
 
 int test_fds[10] = { -1 };
 int nr_test_fds;
@@ -1243,7 +1244,7 @@ void test_ptrace_of_child(int *ptr, u16 pkey)
 	pkey_assert(ret != -1);
 	/* Now access from the current task, and expect NO exception: */
 	peek_result = read_ptr(plain_ptr);
-	do_not_expect_pk_fault();
+	do_not_expect_pk_fault("read plain pointer after ptrace");
 
 	ret = ptrace(PTRACE_DETACH, child_pid, ignored, 0);
 	pkey_assert(ret != -1);
@@ -1287,7 +1288,7 @@ void test_executing_on_unreadable_memory(int *ptr, u16 pkey)
 	 */
 	madvise(p1, PAGE_SIZE, MADV_DONTNEED);
 	lots_o_noops_around_write(&scratch);
-	do_not_expect_pk_fault();
+	do_not_expect_pk_fault("executing on PROT_EXEC memory");
 	ptr_contents = read_ptr(p1);
 	dprintf2("ptr (%p) contents@%d: %x\n", p1, __LINE__, ptr_contents);
 	expected_pk_fault(pkey);

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* [tip:x86/urgent] x86/pkeys/selftests: Stop using assert()
  2018-05-09 17:13 ` [PATCH 02/13] x86/pkeys/selftests: Stop using assert() Dave Hansen
@ 2018-05-14 12:41   ` tip-bot for Dave Hansen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: tip-bot for Dave Hansen @ 2018-05-14 12:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-tip-commits
  Cc: tglx, linux-kernel, dave.hansen, linuxram, shuah, mpe, akpm,
	dave.hansen, hpa, torvalds, mingo, peterz

Commit-ID:  86b9eea230edf4c67d4d4a70fba9b74505867a25
Gitweb:     https://git.kernel.org/tip/86b9eea230edf4c67d4d4a70fba9b74505867a25
Author:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
AuthorDate: Wed, 9 May 2018 10:13:40 -0700
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Mon, 14 May 2018 11:14:45 +0200

x86/pkeys/selftests: Stop using assert()

If we use assert(), the program "crashes".  That can be scary to users,
so stop doing it.  Just exit with a >0 exit code instead.

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michael Ellermen <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180509171340.E63EF7DA@viggo.jf.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c | 12 ++++++++----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
index a0f0a732784b..8537a7cfe1cc 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
@@ -72,10 +72,9 @@ extern void abort_hooks(void);
 				test_nr, iteration_nr);	\
 		dprintf0("errno at assert: %d", errno);	\
 		abort_hooks();			\
-		assert(condition);		\
+		exit(__LINE__);			\
 	}					\
 } while (0)
-#define raw_assert(cond) assert(cond)
 
 void cat_into_file(char *str, char *file)
 {
@@ -87,12 +86,17 @@ void cat_into_file(char *str, char *file)
 	 * these need to be raw because they are called under
 	 * pkey_assert()
 	 */
-	raw_assert(fd >= 0);
+	if (fd < 0) {
+		fprintf(stderr, "error opening '%s'\n", str);
+		perror("error: ");
+		exit(__LINE__);
+	}
+
 	ret = write(fd, str, strlen(str));
 	if (ret != strlen(str)) {
 		perror("write to file failed");
 		fprintf(stderr, "filename: '%s' str: '%s'\n", file, str);
-		raw_assert(0);
+		exit(__LINE__);
 	}
 	close(fd);
 }

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* [tip:x86/urgent] x86/pkeys/selftests: Remove dead debugging code, fix dprint_in_signal
  2018-05-09 17:13 ` [PATCH 03/13] x86/pkeys/selftests: Remove dead debugging code, fix dprint_in_signal Dave Hansen
@ 2018-05-14 12:41   ` tip-bot for Dave Hansen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: tip-bot for Dave Hansen @ 2018-05-14 12:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-tip-commits
  Cc: hpa, mpe, dave.hansen, peterz, dave.hansen, torvalds,
	linux-kernel, shuah, mingo, akpm, linuxram, tglx

Commit-ID:  a50093d60464dd51d1ae0c2267b0abe9e1de77f3
Gitweb:     https://git.kernel.org/tip/a50093d60464dd51d1ae0c2267b0abe9e1de77f3
Author:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
AuthorDate: Wed, 9 May 2018 10:13:42 -0700
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Mon, 14 May 2018 11:14:45 +0200

x86/pkeys/selftests: Remove dead debugging code, fix dprint_in_signal

There is some noisy debug code at the end of the signal handler.  It was
disabled by an early, unconditional "return".  However, that return also
hid a dprint_in_signal=0, which kept dprint_in_signal=1 and effectively
locked us into permanent dprint_in_signal=1 behavior.

Remove the return and the dead code, fixing dprint_in_signal.

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michael Ellermen <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180509171342.846B9B2E@viggo.jf.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c | 16 ----------------
 1 file changed, 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
index 8537a7cfe1cc..5f5aedb80e7b 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
@@ -325,22 +325,6 @@ void signal_handler(int signum, siginfo_t *si, void *vucontext)
 	dprintf1("WARNING: set PRKU=0 to allow faulting instruction to continue\n");
 	pkru_faults++;
 	dprintf1("<<<<==================================================\n");
-	return;
-	if (trapno == 14) {
-		fprintf(stderr,
-			"ERROR: In signal handler, page fault, trapno = %d, ip = %016lx\n",
-			trapno, ip);
-		fprintf(stderr, "si_addr %p\n", si->si_addr);
-		fprintf(stderr, "REG_ERR: %lx\n",
-				(unsigned long)uctxt->uc_mcontext.gregs[REG_ERR]);
-		exit(1);
-	} else {
-		fprintf(stderr, "unexpected trap %d! at 0x%lx\n", trapno, ip);
-		fprintf(stderr, "si_addr %p\n", si->si_addr);
-		fprintf(stderr, "REG_ERR: %lx\n",
-				(unsigned long)uctxt->uc_mcontext.gregs[REG_ERR]);
-		exit(2);
-	}
 	dprint_in_signal = 0;
 }
 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* [tip:x86/urgent] x86/pkeys/selftests: Avoid printf-in-signal deadlocks
  2018-05-09 17:13 ` [PATCH 04/13] x86/pkeys/selftests: Avoid printf-in-signal deadlocks Dave Hansen
@ 2018-05-14 12:42   ` tip-bot for Dave Hansen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: tip-bot for Dave Hansen @ 2018-05-14 12:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-tip-commits
  Cc: shuah, hpa, peterz, dave.hansen, mpe, dave.hansen, linux-kernel,
	torvalds, mingo, tglx, akpm, linuxram

Commit-ID:  caf9eb6b4c82fc6cbd03697052ff22d97b0c377b
Gitweb:     https://git.kernel.org/tip/caf9eb6b4c82fc6cbd03697052ff22d97b0c377b
Author:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
AuthorDate: Wed, 9 May 2018 10:13:44 -0700
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Mon, 14 May 2018 11:14:45 +0200

x86/pkeys/selftests: Avoid printf-in-signal deadlocks

printf() and friends are unusable in signal handlers.  They deadlock.
The pkey selftest does not do any normal printing in signal handlers,
only extra debugging.  So, just print the format string so we get
*some* output when debugging.

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michael Ellermen <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180509171344.C53FD2F3@viggo.jf.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/x86/pkey-helpers.h | 20 ++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/pkey-helpers.h b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/pkey-helpers.h
index b3cb7670e026..254e5436bdd9 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/pkey-helpers.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/pkey-helpers.h
@@ -26,30 +26,26 @@ static inline void sigsafe_printf(const char *format, ...)
 {
 	va_list ap;
 
-	va_start(ap, format);
 	if (!dprint_in_signal) {
+		va_start(ap, format);
 		vprintf(format, ap);
+		va_end(ap);
 	} else {
 		int ret;
-		int len = vsnprintf(dprint_in_signal_buffer,
-				    DPRINT_IN_SIGNAL_BUF_SIZE,
-				    format, ap);
 		/*
-		 * len is amount that would have been printed,
-		 * but actual write is truncated at BUF_SIZE.
+		 * No printf() functions are signal-safe.
+		 * They deadlock easily. Write the format
+		 * string to get some output, even if
+		 * incomplete.
 		 */
-		if (len > DPRINT_IN_SIGNAL_BUF_SIZE)
-			len = DPRINT_IN_SIGNAL_BUF_SIZE;
-		ret = write(1, dprint_in_signal_buffer, len);
+		ret = write(1, format, strlen(format));
 		if (ret < 0)
-			abort();
+			exit(1);
 	}
-	va_end(ap);
 }
 #define dprintf_level(level, args...) do {	\
 	if (level <= DEBUG_LEVEL)		\
 		sigsafe_printf(args);		\
-	fflush(NULL);				\
 } while (0)
 #define dprintf0(args...) dprintf_level(0, args)
 #define dprintf1(args...) dprintf_level(1, args)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* [tip:x86/urgent] x86/pkeys/selftests: Allow faults on unknown keys
  2018-05-09 17:13 ` [PATCH 05/13] x86/pkeys/selftests: Allow faults on unknown keys Dave Hansen
@ 2018-05-14 12:42   ` tip-bot for Dave Hansen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: tip-bot for Dave Hansen @ 2018-05-14 12:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-tip-commits
  Cc: hpa, torvalds, mingo, tglx, dave.hansen, shuah, peterz, mpe,
	linuxram, linux-kernel, dave.hansen, akpm

Commit-ID:  7e7fd67ca39335a49619729821efb7cbdd674eb0
Gitweb:     https://git.kernel.org/tip/7e7fd67ca39335a49619729821efb7cbdd674eb0
Author:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
AuthorDate: Wed, 9 May 2018 10:13:46 -0700
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Mon, 14 May 2018 11:14:45 +0200

x86/pkeys/selftests: Allow faults on unknown keys

The exec-only pkey is allocated inside the kernel and userspace
is not told what it is.  So, allow PK faults to occur that have
an unknown key.

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michael Ellermen <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180509171345.7FC7DA00@viggo.jf.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c | 10 +++++++++-
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
index 5f5aedb80e7b..7d95acd2aec3 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
@@ -921,13 +921,21 @@ void *malloc_pkey(long size, int prot, u16 pkey)
 }
 
 int last_pkru_faults;
+#define UNKNOWN_PKEY -2
 void expected_pk_fault(int pkey)
 {
 	dprintf2("%s(): last_pkru_faults: %d pkru_faults: %d\n",
 			__func__, last_pkru_faults, pkru_faults);
 	dprintf2("%s(%d): last_si_pkey: %d\n", __func__, pkey, last_si_pkey);
 	pkey_assert(last_pkru_faults + 1 == pkru_faults);
-	pkey_assert(last_si_pkey == pkey);
+
+       /*
+	* For exec-only memory, we do not know the pkey in
+	* advance, so skip this check.
+	*/
+	if (pkey != UNKNOWN_PKEY)
+		pkey_assert(last_si_pkey == pkey);
+
 	/*
 	 * The signal handler shold have cleared out PKRU to let the
 	 * test program continue.  We now have to restore it.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* [tip:x86/urgent] x86/pkeys/selftests: Factor out "instruction page"
  2018-05-09 17:13 ` [PATCH 06/13] x86/pkeys/selftests: Factor out "instruction page" Dave Hansen
@ 2018-05-14 12:43   ` tip-bot for Dave Hansen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: tip-bot for Dave Hansen @ 2018-05-14 12:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-tip-commits
  Cc: peterz, mingo, hpa, akpm, torvalds, linux-kernel, mpe,
	dave.hansen, dave.hansen, shuah, linuxram, tglx

Commit-ID:  3fcd2b2d928904cbf30b01e2c5e4f1dd2f9ab262
Gitweb:     https://git.kernel.org/tip/3fcd2b2d928904cbf30b01e2c5e4f1dd2f9ab262
Author:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
AuthorDate: Wed, 9 May 2018 10:13:47 -0700
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Mon, 14 May 2018 11:14:45 +0200

x86/pkeys/selftests: Factor out "instruction page"

We currently have an execute-only test, but it is for
the explicit mprotect_pkey() interface.  We will soon
add a test for the implicit mprotect(PROT_EXEC)
enterface.  We need this code in both tests.

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michael Ellermen <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180509171347.C64AB733@viggo.jf.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
index 7d95acd2aec3..083ebd51b44e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
@@ -1253,12 +1253,9 @@ void test_ptrace_of_child(int *ptr, u16 pkey)
 	free(plain_ptr_unaligned);
 }
 
-void test_executing_on_unreadable_memory(int *ptr, u16 pkey)
+void *get_pointer_to_instructions(void)
 {
 	void *p1;
-	int scratch;
-	int ptr_contents;
-	int ret;
 
 	p1 = ALIGN_PTR_UP(&lots_o_noops_around_write, PAGE_SIZE);
 	dprintf3("&lots_o_noops: %p\n", &lots_o_noops_around_write);
@@ -1268,7 +1265,23 @@ void test_executing_on_unreadable_memory(int *ptr, u16 pkey)
 	/* Point 'p1' at the *second* page of the function: */
 	p1 += PAGE_SIZE;
 
+	/*
+	 * Try to ensure we fault this in on next touch to ensure
+	 * we get an instruction fault as opposed to a data one
+	 */
 	madvise(p1, PAGE_SIZE, MADV_DONTNEED);
+
+	return p1;
+}
+
+void test_executing_on_unreadable_memory(int *ptr, u16 pkey)
+{
+	void *p1;
+	int scratch;
+	int ptr_contents;
+	int ret;
+
+	p1 = get_pointer_to_instructions();
 	lots_o_noops_around_write(&scratch);
 	ptr_contents = read_ptr(p1);
 	dprintf2("ptr (%p) contents@%d: %x\n", p1, __LINE__, ptr_contents);

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* [tip:x86/urgent] x86/pkeys/selftests: Add PROT_EXEC test
  2018-05-09 17:13 ` [PATCH 07/13] x86/pkeys/selftests: Add PROT_EXEC test Dave Hansen
@ 2018-05-14 12:43   ` tip-bot for Dave Hansen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: tip-bot for Dave Hansen @ 2018-05-14 12:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-tip-commits
  Cc: hpa, linux-kernel, linuxram, shuah, dave.hansen, torvalds, mpe,
	tglx, mingo, akpm, dave.hansen, peterz

Commit-ID:  6af17cf89e99b64cf1f660bf848755442ab2f047
Gitweb:     https://git.kernel.org/tip/6af17cf89e99b64cf1f660bf848755442ab2f047
Author:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
AuthorDate: Wed, 9 May 2018 10:13:48 -0700
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Mon, 14 May 2018 11:14:45 +0200

x86/pkeys/selftests: Add PROT_EXEC test

Under the covers, implement executable-only memory with
protection keys when userspace calls mprotect(PROT_EXEC).

But, we did not have a selftest for that.  Now we do.

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michael Ellermen <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180509171348.9EEE4BEF@viggo.jf.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
index 083ebd51b44e..8cb4fe58f381 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
@@ -1303,6 +1303,49 @@ void test_executing_on_unreadable_memory(int *ptr, u16 pkey)
 	expected_pk_fault(pkey);
 }
 
+void test_implicit_mprotect_exec_only_memory(int *ptr, u16 pkey)
+{
+	void *p1;
+	int scratch;
+	int ptr_contents;
+	int ret;
+
+	dprintf1("%s() start\n", __func__);
+
+	p1 = get_pointer_to_instructions();
+	lots_o_noops_around_write(&scratch);
+	ptr_contents = read_ptr(p1);
+	dprintf2("ptr (%p) contents@%d: %x\n", p1, __LINE__, ptr_contents);
+
+	/* Use a *normal* mprotect(), not mprotect_pkey(): */
+	ret = mprotect(p1, PAGE_SIZE, PROT_EXEC);
+	pkey_assert(!ret);
+
+	dprintf2("pkru: %x\n", rdpkru());
+
+	/* Make sure this is an *instruction* fault */
+	madvise(p1, PAGE_SIZE, MADV_DONTNEED);
+	lots_o_noops_around_write(&scratch);
+	do_not_expect_pk_fault("executing on PROT_EXEC memory");
+	ptr_contents = read_ptr(p1);
+	dprintf2("ptr (%p) contents@%d: %x\n", p1, __LINE__, ptr_contents);
+	expected_pk_fault(UNKNOWN_PKEY);
+
+	/*
+	 * Put the memory back to non-PROT_EXEC.  Should clear the
+	 * exec-only pkey off the VMA and allow it to be readable
+	 * again.  Go to PROT_NONE first to check for a kernel bug
+	 * that did not clear the pkey when doing PROT_NONE.
+	 */
+	ret = mprotect(p1, PAGE_SIZE, PROT_NONE);
+	pkey_assert(!ret);
+
+	ret = mprotect(p1, PAGE_SIZE, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC);
+	pkey_assert(!ret);
+	ptr_contents = read_ptr(p1);
+	do_not_expect_pk_fault("plain read on recently PROT_EXEC area");
+}
+
 void test_mprotect_pkey_on_unsupported_cpu(int *ptr, u16 pkey)
 {
 	int size = PAGE_SIZE;
@@ -1327,6 +1370,7 @@ void (*pkey_tests[])(int *ptr, u16 pkey) = {
 	test_kernel_gup_of_access_disabled_region,
 	test_kernel_gup_write_to_write_disabled_region,
 	test_executing_on_unreadable_memory,
+	test_implicit_mprotect_exec_only_memory,
 	test_ptrace_of_child,
 	test_pkey_syscalls_on_non_allocated_pkey,
 	test_pkey_syscalls_bad_args,

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* [tip:x86/urgent] x86/pkeys/selftests: Fix pkey exhaustion test off-by-one
  2018-05-09 17:13 ` [PATCH 08/13] x86/pkeys/selftests: Fix pkey exhaustion test off-by-one Dave Hansen
@ 2018-05-14 12:44   ` tip-bot for Dave Hansen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: tip-bot for Dave Hansen @ 2018-05-14 12:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-tip-commits
  Cc: dave.hansen, mpe, tglx, torvalds, hpa, akpm, mingo, linuxram,
	shuah, linux-kernel, dave.hansen, peterz

Commit-ID:  f50b4878329ab61d8e05796f655adeb6f5fb57c6
Gitweb:     https://git.kernel.org/tip/f50b4878329ab61d8e05796f655adeb6f5fb57c6
Author:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
AuthorDate: Wed, 9 May 2018 10:13:50 -0700
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Mon, 14 May 2018 11:14:45 +0200

x86/pkeys/selftests: Fix pkey exhaustion test off-by-one

In our "exhaust all pkeys" test, we make sure that there
is the expected number available.  Turns out that the
test did not cover the execute-only key, but discussed
it anyway.  It did *not* discuss the test-allocated
key.

Now that we have a test for the mprotect(PROT_EXEC) case,
this off-by-one issue showed itself.  Correct the off-by-
one and add the explanation for the case we missed.

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michael Ellermen <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180509171350.E1656B95@viggo.jf.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c | 13 ++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
index 8cb4fe58f381..55a4e349a45e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
@@ -1163,12 +1163,15 @@ void test_pkey_alloc_exhaust(int *ptr, u16 pkey)
 	pkey_assert(i < NR_PKEYS*2);
 
 	/*
-	 * There are 16 pkeys supported in hardware.  One is taken
-	 * up for the default (0) and another can be taken up by
-	 * an execute-only mapping.  Ensure that we can allocate
-	 * at least 14 (16-2).
+	 * There are 16 pkeys supported in hardware.  Three are
+	 * allocated by the time we get here:
+	 *   1. The default key (0)
+	 *   2. One possibly consumed by an execute-only mapping.
+	 *   3. One allocated by the test code and passed in via
+	 *      'pkey' to this function.
+	 * Ensure that we can allocate at least another 13 (16-3).
 	 */
-	pkey_assert(i >= NR_PKEYS-2);
+	pkey_assert(i >= NR_PKEYS-3);
 
 	for (i = 0; i < nr_allocated_pkeys; i++) {
 		err = sys_pkey_free(allocated_pkeys[i]);

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* [tip:x86/urgent] x86/pkeys: Override pkey when moving away from PROT_EXEC
  2018-05-09 17:13 ` [PATCH 09/13] x86/pkeys: Override pkey when moving away from PROT_EXEC Dave Hansen
@ 2018-05-14 12:44   ` tip-bot for Dave Hansen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: tip-bot for Dave Hansen @ 2018-05-14 12:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-tip-commits
  Cc: mingo, shakeelb, shuah, hpa, mpe, akpm, dave.hansen, dave.hansen,
	tglx, linuxram, torvalds, peterz, linux-kernel

Commit-ID:  0a0b152083cfc44ec1bb599b57b7aab41327f998
Gitweb:     https://git.kernel.org/tip/0a0b152083cfc44ec1bb599b57b7aab41327f998
Author:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
AuthorDate: Wed, 9 May 2018 10:13:51 -0700
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Mon, 14 May 2018 11:14:45 +0200

x86/pkeys: Override pkey when moving away from PROT_EXEC

I got a bug report that the following code (roughly) was
causing a SIGSEGV:

	mprotect(ptr, size, PROT_EXEC);
	mprotect(ptr, size, PROT_NONE);
	mprotect(ptr, size, PROT_READ);
	*ptr = 100;

The problem is hit when the mprotect(PROT_EXEC)
is implicitly assigned a protection key to the VMA, and made
that key ACCESS_DENY|WRITE_DENY.  The PROT_NONE mprotect()
failed to remove the protection key, and the PROT_NONE->
PROT_READ left the PTE usable, but the pkey still in place
and left the memory inaccessible.

To fix this, we ensure that we always "override" the pkee
at mprotect() if the VMA does not have execute-only
permissions, but the VMA has the execute-only pkey.

We had a check for PROT_READ/WRITE, but it did not work
for PROT_NONE.  This entirely removes the PROT_* checks,
which ensures that PROT_NONE now works.

Reported-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michael Ellermen <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 62b5f7d013f ("mm/core, x86/mm/pkeys: Add execute-only protection keys support")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180509171351.084C5A71@viggo.jf.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/pkeys.h | 12 +++++++++++-
 arch/x86/mm/pkeys.c          | 21 +++++++++++----------
 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/pkeys.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/pkeys.h
index a0ba1ffda0df..39cd292805a9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/pkeys.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/pkeys.h
@@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
 #ifndef _ASM_X86_PKEYS_H
 #define _ASM_X86_PKEYS_H
 
+#define ARCH_DEFAULT_PKEY	0
+
 #define arch_max_pkey() (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_OSPKE) ? 16 : 1)
 
 extern int arch_set_user_pkey_access(struct task_struct *tsk, int pkey,
@@ -15,7 +17,7 @@ extern int __execute_only_pkey(struct mm_struct *mm);
 static inline int execute_only_pkey(struct mm_struct *mm)
 {
 	if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_OSPKE))
-		return 0;
+		return ARCH_DEFAULT_PKEY;
 
 	return __execute_only_pkey(mm);
 }
@@ -56,6 +58,14 @@ bool mm_pkey_is_allocated(struct mm_struct *mm, int pkey)
 		return false;
 	if (pkey >= arch_max_pkey())
 		return false;
+	/*
+	 * The exec-only pkey is set in the allocation map, but
+	 * is not available to any of the user interfaces like
+	 * mprotect_pkey().
+	 */
+	if (pkey == mm->context.execute_only_pkey)
+		return false;
+
 	return mm_pkey_allocation_map(mm) & (1U << pkey);
 }
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pkeys.c b/arch/x86/mm/pkeys.c
index d7bc0eea20a5..6e98e0a7c923 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/pkeys.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/pkeys.c
@@ -94,26 +94,27 @@ int __arch_override_mprotect_pkey(struct vm_area_struct *vma, int prot, int pkey
 	 */
 	if (pkey != -1)
 		return pkey;
-	/*
-	 * Look for a protection-key-drive execute-only mapping
-	 * which is now being given permissions that are not
-	 * execute-only.  Move it back to the default pkey.
-	 */
-	if (vma_is_pkey_exec_only(vma) &&
-	    (prot & (PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE))) {
-		return 0;
-	}
+
 	/*
 	 * The mapping is execute-only.  Go try to get the
 	 * execute-only protection key.  If we fail to do that,
 	 * fall through as if we do not have execute-only
-	 * support.
+	 * support in this mm.
 	 */
 	if (prot == PROT_EXEC) {
 		pkey = execute_only_pkey(vma->vm_mm);
 		if (pkey > 0)
 			return pkey;
+	} else if (vma_is_pkey_exec_only(vma)) {
+		/*
+		 * Protections are *not* PROT_EXEC, but the mapping
+		 * is using the exec-only pkey.  This mapping was
+		 * PROT_EXEC and will no longer be.  Move back to
+		 * the default pkey.
+		 */
+		return ARCH_DEFAULT_PKEY;
 	}
+
 	/*
 	 * This is a vanilla, non-pkey mprotect (or we failed to
 	 * setup execute-only), inherit the pkey from the VMA we

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* [tip:x86/urgent] x86/pkeys/selftests: Fix pointer math
  2018-05-09 17:13 ` [PATCH 10/13] x86/pkeys/selftests: Fix pointer math Dave Hansen
@ 2018-05-14 12:45   ` tip-bot for Dave Hansen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: tip-bot for Dave Hansen @ 2018-05-14 12:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-tip-commits
  Cc: linuxram, mpe, akpm, torvalds, peterz, mingo, hpa, dave.hansen,
	dave.hansen, linux-kernel, tglx, shuah

Commit-ID:  3d64f4ed15c3c53dba4c514bf59c334464dee373
Gitweb:     https://git.kernel.org/tip/3d64f4ed15c3c53dba4c514bf59c334464dee373
Author:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
AuthorDate: Wed, 9 May 2018 10:13:52 -0700
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Mon, 14 May 2018 11:14:45 +0200

x86/pkeys/selftests: Fix pointer math

We dump out the entire area of the siginfo where the si_pkey_ptr is
supposed to be.  But, we do some math on the poitner, which is a u32.
We intended to do byte math, not u32 math on the pointer.

Cast it over to a u8* so it works.

Also, move this block of code to below th si_code check.  It doesn't
hurt anything, but the si_pkey field is gibberish for other signal
types.

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michael Ellermen <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180509171352.9BE09819@viggo.jf.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c | 14 +++++++-------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
index 55a4e349a45e..ee8176358d12 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
@@ -303,13 +303,6 @@ void signal_handler(int signum, siginfo_t *si, void *vucontext)
 		dump_mem(pkru_ptr - 128, 256);
 	pkey_assert(*pkru_ptr);
 
-	si_pkey_ptr = (u32 *)(((u8 *)si) + si_pkey_offset);
-	dprintf1("si_pkey_ptr: %p\n", si_pkey_ptr);
-	dump_mem(si_pkey_ptr - 8, 24);
-	siginfo_pkey = *si_pkey_ptr;
-	pkey_assert(siginfo_pkey < NR_PKEYS);
-	last_si_pkey = siginfo_pkey;
-
 	if ((si->si_code == SEGV_MAPERR) ||
 	    (si->si_code == SEGV_ACCERR) ||
 	    (si->si_code == SEGV_BNDERR)) {
@@ -317,6 +310,13 @@ void signal_handler(int signum, siginfo_t *si, void *vucontext)
 		exit(4);
 	}
 
+	si_pkey_ptr = (u32 *)(((u8 *)si) + si_pkey_offset);
+	dprintf1("si_pkey_ptr: %p\n", si_pkey_ptr);
+	dump_mem((u8 *)si_pkey_ptr - 8, 24);
+	siginfo_pkey = *si_pkey_ptr;
+	pkey_assert(siginfo_pkey < NR_PKEYS);
+	last_si_pkey = siginfo_pkey;
+
 	dprintf1("signal pkru from xsave: %08x\n", *pkru_ptr);
 	/* need __rdpkru() version so we do not do shadow_pkru checking */
 	dprintf1("signal pkru from  pkru: %08x\n", __rdpkru());

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* [tip:x86/urgent] x86/pkeys/selftests: Save off 'prot' for allocations
  2018-05-09 17:13 ` [PATCH 11/13] x86/pkeys/selftests: Save off 'prot' for allocations Dave Hansen
@ 2018-05-14 12:45   ` tip-bot for Dave Hansen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: tip-bot for Dave Hansen @ 2018-05-14 12:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-tip-commits
  Cc: akpm, mingo, mpe, linux-kernel, dave.hansen, peterz, tglx,
	torvalds, dave.hansen, linuxram, hpa, shuah

Commit-ID:  acb25d761d6f2f64e785ccefc71e54f244f1eda4
Gitweb:     https://git.kernel.org/tip/acb25d761d6f2f64e785ccefc71e54f244f1eda4
Author:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
AuthorDate: Wed, 9 May 2018 10:13:54 -0700
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Mon, 14 May 2018 11:14:45 +0200

x86/pkeys/selftests: Save off 'prot' for allocations

This makes it possible to to tell what 'prot' a given allocation
is supposed to have.  That way, if we want to change just the
pkey, we know what 'prot' to pass to mprotect_pkey().

Also, keep a record of the most recent allocation so the tests
can easily find it.

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michael Ellermen <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180509171354.AA23E228@viggo.jf.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c | 14 +++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
index ee8176358d12..986ed38a2b25 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
@@ -677,10 +677,12 @@ int mprotect_pkey(void *ptr, size_t size, unsigned long orig_prot,
 struct pkey_malloc_record {
 	void *ptr;
 	long size;
+	int prot;
 };
 struct pkey_malloc_record *pkey_malloc_records;
+struct pkey_malloc_record *pkey_last_malloc_record;
 long nr_pkey_malloc_records;
-void record_pkey_malloc(void *ptr, long size)
+void record_pkey_malloc(void *ptr, long size, int prot)
 {
 	long i;
 	struct pkey_malloc_record *rec = NULL;
@@ -712,6 +714,8 @@ void record_pkey_malloc(void *ptr, long size)
 		(int)(rec - pkey_malloc_records), rec, ptr, size);
 	rec->ptr = ptr;
 	rec->size = size;
+	rec->prot = prot;
+	pkey_last_malloc_record = rec;
 	nr_pkey_malloc_records++;
 }
 
@@ -756,7 +760,7 @@ void *malloc_pkey_with_mprotect(long size, int prot, u16 pkey)
 	pkey_assert(ptr != (void *)-1);
 	ret = mprotect_pkey((void *)ptr, PAGE_SIZE, prot, pkey);
 	pkey_assert(!ret);
-	record_pkey_malloc(ptr, size);
+	record_pkey_malloc(ptr, size, prot);
 	rdpkru();
 
 	dprintf1("%s() for pkey %d @ %p\n", __func__, pkey, ptr);
@@ -777,7 +781,7 @@ void *malloc_pkey_anon_huge(long size, int prot, u16 pkey)
 	size = ALIGN_UP(size, HPAGE_SIZE * 2);
 	ptr = mmap(NULL, size, PROT_NONE, MAP_ANONYMOUS|MAP_PRIVATE, -1, 0);
 	pkey_assert(ptr != (void *)-1);
-	record_pkey_malloc(ptr, size);
+	record_pkey_malloc(ptr, size, prot);
 	mprotect_pkey(ptr, size, prot, pkey);
 
 	dprintf1("unaligned ptr: %p\n", ptr);
@@ -850,7 +854,7 @@ void *malloc_pkey_hugetlb(long size, int prot, u16 pkey)
 	pkey_assert(ptr != (void *)-1);
 	mprotect_pkey(ptr, size, prot, pkey);
 
-	record_pkey_malloc(ptr, size);
+	record_pkey_malloc(ptr, size, prot);
 
 	dprintf1("mmap()'d hugetlbfs for pkey %d @ %p\n", pkey, ptr);
 	return ptr;
@@ -872,7 +876,7 @@ void *malloc_pkey_mmap_dax(long size, int prot, u16 pkey)
 
 	mprotect_pkey(ptr, size, prot, pkey);
 
-	record_pkey_malloc(ptr, size);
+	record_pkey_malloc(ptr, size, prot);
 
 	dprintf1("mmap()'d for pkey %d @ %p\n", pkey, ptr);
 	close(fd);

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* [tip:x86/urgent] x86/pkeys/selftests: Add a test for pkey 0
  2018-05-09 17:13 ` [PATCH 12/13] x86/pkeys/selftests: Add a test for pkey 0 Dave Hansen
@ 2018-05-14 12:46   ` tip-bot for Dave Hansen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: tip-bot for Dave Hansen @ 2018-05-14 12:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-tip-commits
  Cc: tglx, torvalds, dave.hansen, peterz, dave.hansen, mingo, shuah,
	mpe, linux-kernel, hpa, akpm, linuxram

Commit-ID:  3488a600d90bcaf061b104dbcfbdc8d99b398312
Gitweb:     https://git.kernel.org/tip/3488a600d90bcaf061b104dbcfbdc8d99b398312
Author:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
AuthorDate: Wed, 9 May 2018 10:13:56 -0700
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Mon, 14 May 2018 11:14:45 +0200

x86/pkeys/selftests: Add a test for pkey 0

Protection key 0 is the default key for all memory and will
not normally come back from pkey_alloc().  But, you might
still want pass it to mprotect_pkey().

This check ensures that you can use pkey 0.

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michael Ellermen <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180509171356.9E40B254@viggo.jf.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
index 986ed38a2b25..460b4bdf4c1e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
@@ -1184,6 +1184,35 @@ void test_pkey_alloc_exhaust(int *ptr, u16 pkey)
 	}
 }
 
+/*
+ * pkey 0 is special.  It is allocated by default, so you do not
+ * have to call pkey_alloc() to use it first.  Make sure that it
+ * is usable.
+ */
+void test_mprotect_with_pkey_0(int *ptr, u16 pkey)
+{
+	long size;
+	int prot;
+
+	assert(pkey_last_malloc_record);
+	size = pkey_last_malloc_record->size;
+	/*
+	 * This is a bit of a hack.  But mprotect() requires
+	 * huge-page-aligned sizes when operating on hugetlbfs.
+	 * So, make sure that we use something that's a multiple
+	 * of a huge page when we can.
+	 */
+	if (size >= HPAGE_SIZE)
+		size = HPAGE_SIZE;
+	prot = pkey_last_malloc_record->prot;
+
+	/* Use pkey 0 */
+	mprotect_pkey(ptr, size, prot, 0);
+
+	/* Make sure that we can set it back to the original pkey. */
+	mprotect_pkey(ptr, size, prot, pkey);
+}
+
 void test_ptrace_of_child(int *ptr, u16 pkey)
 {
 	__attribute__((__unused__)) int peek_result;
@@ -1378,6 +1407,7 @@ void (*pkey_tests[])(int *ptr, u16 pkey) = {
 	test_kernel_gup_write_to_write_disabled_region,
 	test_executing_on_unreadable_memory,
 	test_implicit_mprotect_exec_only_memory,
+	test_mprotect_with_pkey_0,
 	test_ptrace_of_child,
 	test_pkey_syscalls_on_non_allocated_pkey,
 	test_pkey_syscalls_bad_args,

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

* [tip:x86/urgent] x86/pkeys: Do not special case protection key 0
  2018-05-09 17:13 ` [PATCH 13/13] x86/pkeys: Do not special case protection key 0 Dave Hansen
@ 2018-05-14 12:46   ` tip-bot for Dave Hansen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: tip-bot for Dave Hansen @ 2018-05-14 12:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-tip-commits
  Cc: peterz, linux-kernel, hpa, tglx, shuah, mingo, dave.hansen,
	linuxram, mpe, torvalds, dave.hansen

Commit-ID:  2fa9d1cfaf0e02f8abef0757002bff12dfcfa4e6
Gitweb:     https://git.kernel.org/tip/2fa9d1cfaf0e02f8abef0757002bff12dfcfa4e6
Author:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
AuthorDate: Wed, 9 May 2018 10:13:58 -0700
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Mon, 14 May 2018 11:14:45 +0200

x86/pkeys: Do not special case protection key 0

mm_pkey_is_allocated() treats pkey 0 as unallocated.  That is
inconsistent with the manpages, and also inconsistent with
mm->context.pkey_allocation_map.  Stop special casing it and only
disallow values that are actually bad (< 0).

The end-user visible effect of this is that you can now use
mprotect_pkey() to set pkey=0.

This is a bit nicer than what Ram proposed[1] because it is simpler
and removes special-casing for pkey 0.  On the other hand, it does
allow applications to pkey_free() pkey-0, but that's just a silly
thing to do, so we are not going to protect against it.

The scenario that could happen is similar to what happens if you free
any other pkey that is in use: it might get reallocated later and used
to protect some other data.  The most likely scenario is that pkey-0
comes back from pkey_alloc(), an access-disable or write-disable bit
is set in PKRU for it, and the next stack access will SIGSEGV.  It's
not horribly different from if you mprotect()'d your stack or heap to
be unreadable or unwritable, which is generally very foolish, but also
not explicitly prevented by the kernel.

1. http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1522112702-27853-1-git-send-email-linuxram@us.ibm.com

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>p
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michael Ellermen <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 58ab9a088dda ("x86/pkeys: Check against max pkey to avoid overflows")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180509171358.47FD785E@viggo.jf.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h | 2 +-
 arch/x86/include/asm/pkeys.h       | 6 +++---
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h
index 57e3785d0d26..cf9911b5a53c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h
@@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ static inline int init_new_context(struct task_struct *tsk,
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_INTEL_MEMORY_PROTECTION_KEYS
 	if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_OSPKE)) {
-		/* pkey 0 is the default and always allocated */
+		/* pkey 0 is the default and allocated implicitly */
 		mm->context.pkey_allocation_map = 0x1;
 		/* -1 means unallocated or invalid */
 		mm->context.execute_only_pkey = -1;
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/pkeys.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/pkeys.h
index 39cd292805a9..851c04b7a092 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/pkeys.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/pkeys.h
@@ -51,10 +51,10 @@ bool mm_pkey_is_allocated(struct mm_struct *mm, int pkey)
 {
 	/*
 	 * "Allocated" pkeys are those that have been returned
-	 * from pkey_alloc().  pkey 0 is special, and never
-	 * returned from pkey_alloc().
+	 * from pkey_alloc() or pkey 0 which is allocated
+	 * implicitly when the mm is created.
 	 */
-	if (pkey <= 0)
+	if (pkey < 0)
 		return false;
 	if (pkey >= arch_max_pkey())
 		return false;

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2018-05-14 12:47 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-05-09 17:13 [PATCH 00/13] [v4] x86, pkeys: two protection keys bug fixes Dave Hansen
2018-05-09 17:13 ` [PATCH 01/13] x86/pkeys/selftests: Give better unexpected fault error messages Dave Hansen
2018-05-14 12:40   ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Dave Hansen
2018-05-09 17:13 ` [PATCH 02/13] x86/pkeys/selftests: Stop using assert() Dave Hansen
2018-05-14 12:41   ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Dave Hansen
2018-05-09 17:13 ` [PATCH 03/13] x86/pkeys/selftests: Remove dead debugging code, fix dprint_in_signal Dave Hansen
2018-05-14 12:41   ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Dave Hansen
2018-05-09 17:13 ` [PATCH 04/13] x86/pkeys/selftests: Avoid printf-in-signal deadlocks Dave Hansen
2018-05-14 12:42   ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Dave Hansen
2018-05-09 17:13 ` [PATCH 05/13] x86/pkeys/selftests: Allow faults on unknown keys Dave Hansen
2018-05-14 12:42   ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Dave Hansen
2018-05-09 17:13 ` [PATCH 06/13] x86/pkeys/selftests: Factor out "instruction page" Dave Hansen
2018-05-14 12:43   ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Dave Hansen
2018-05-09 17:13 ` [PATCH 07/13] x86/pkeys/selftests: Add PROT_EXEC test Dave Hansen
2018-05-14 12:43   ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Dave Hansen
2018-05-09 17:13 ` [PATCH 08/13] x86/pkeys/selftests: Fix pkey exhaustion test off-by-one Dave Hansen
2018-05-14 12:44   ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Dave Hansen
2018-05-09 17:13 ` [PATCH 09/13] x86/pkeys: Override pkey when moving away from PROT_EXEC Dave Hansen
2018-05-14 12:44   ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Dave Hansen
2018-05-09 17:13 ` [PATCH 10/13] x86/pkeys/selftests: Fix pointer math Dave Hansen
2018-05-14 12:45   ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Dave Hansen
2018-05-09 17:13 ` [PATCH 11/13] x86/pkeys/selftests: Save off 'prot' for allocations Dave Hansen
2018-05-14 12:45   ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Dave Hansen
2018-05-09 17:13 ` [PATCH 12/13] x86/pkeys/selftests: Add a test for pkey 0 Dave Hansen
2018-05-14 12:46   ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Dave Hansen
2018-05-09 17:13 ` [PATCH 13/13] x86/pkeys: Do not special case protection key 0 Dave Hansen
2018-05-14 12:46   ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Dave Hansen
2018-05-14  8:29 ` [PATCH 00/13] [v4] x86, pkeys: two protection keys bug fixes Ingo Molnar
2018-05-14  8:47   ` Ingo Molnar
2018-05-14  8:56   ` [PATCH] x86/pkeys/selftests: Adjust the self-test to fresh distros that export the pkeys ABI Ingo Molnar
2018-05-14 12:39     ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Ingo Molnar
2018-05-14  8:59   ` [PATCH] x86/mpx/selftests: Adjust the self-test to fresh distros that export the MPX ABI Ingo Molnar
2018-05-14 12:39     ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Ingo Molnar

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).