LKML Archive on
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <>
To: Tetsuo Handa <>
Cc: syzbot <>,,
	Al Viro <>,,,,,
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hfsplus: stop workqueue when fill_super() failed
Date: Tue, 15 May 2018 14:34:07 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

On Tue, 15 May 2018 19:11:06 +0900 Tetsuo Handa <> wrote:

> >From ffd64dcf946502e7bb1d23c021ee9a4fc92f9312 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Tetsuo Handa <>
> Date: Tue, 15 May 2018 12:23:03 +0900
> Subject: [PATCH] hfsplus: stop workqueue when fill_super() failed
> syzbot is reporting ODEBUG messages at hfsplus_fill_super() [1].
> This is because hfsplus_fill_super() forgot to call
> cancel_delayed_work_sync().
> As far as I can see, it is hfsplus_mark_mdb_dirty() from
> hfsplus_new_inode() in hfsplus_fill_super() that calls
> queue_delayed_work(). Therefore, I assume that hfsplus_new_inode() does not
> fail if queue_delayed_work() was called, and the out_put_hidden_dir label
> is the appropriate location to call cancel_delayed_work_sync().

Yes, I was scratching my head over that - it is quite unobvious
whereabouts in hfsplus_fill_super() that the work actually starts
getting scheduled.

"somewhere after the last goto out_put_root" might be true, for now. 
But it isn't at all obvious and it isn't very maintainable.

Perhaps it's simply wrong for hfsplus to be marking things dirty and
performing these complex operations partway through fill_super() before
everything is fully set up.

And I wouldn't be comfortable putting the cancel_work_sync() right at
the end of the hfsplus_fill_super() cleanup because the delayed work
handler might be using things which have already been torn down by that

So...  ugh.  A solid shotgun approach would be to put a
cancel_work_sync() immediately after each and every goto target in that
cleanup path, but that's just stupid :(

Nasty.  I can't think of anything clever here.  I guess we can go with
this patch for now, and if new problems crop up we can look at moving
the cancel_work_sync() down to a later part of the teardown sequence.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2018-05-15 21:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-31 20:47 WARNING: ODEBUG bug in hfsplus_fill_super syzbot
2018-05-15 10:11 ` [PATCH] hfsplus: stop workqueue when fill_super() failed Tetsuo Handa
2018-05-15 16:26   ` Ernesto A. Fernández
2018-05-15 21:34   ` Andrew Morton [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH] hfsplus: stop workqueue when fill_super() failed' \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).