LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: rostedt@goodmis.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RCU branching for the v4.19 merge window
Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 07:40:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180517144044.GA6089@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
Hello, Steve!
Another year, another difficult-to-branch set of RCU commits.
In happy contrast to last year, I can make some branches (SRCU, some
of the torture commits, and a few miscellaneous commits), but I will
likely end up with several short branches and one huge one. My thought
is to keep the long branch, but email the patches out in a few separate
serieses, with each depending on its predecessor. For example, one series
from the big branch would be folding the ->gpnum and ->completed fields
into a single ->gp_seq, which helps the RCU-flavor consolidation task.
Another series suppresses some rare false-positive splats that have been
plaguing me for more than a year. Yet another series within this huge
branch applies and optimizes funnel locking for grace-period startup.
The problem is that the conversion to ->gp_seq has a very large footprint,
which of course generates lots of conflicts. I could of course collapse
these commits into a single commit, but if I did that I would also defer
to the merge window following v4.19 due to the resulting loss of bisection
within that change.
Any advice?
The commits are for-mingo..rcu/dev in my -rcu tree.
Thanx, Paul
next reply other threads:[~2018-05-17 14:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-17 14:40 Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2018-05-22 15:27 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-05-22 16:05 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180517144044.GA6089@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--subject='Re: RCU branching for the v4.19 merge window' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).