LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: rostedt@goodmis.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RCU branching for the v4.19 merge window
Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 07:40:44 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180517144044.GA6089@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)

Hello, Steve!

Another year, another difficult-to-branch set of RCU commits.

In happy contrast to last year, I can make some branches (SRCU, some
of the torture commits, and a few miscellaneous commits), but I will
likely end up with several short branches and one huge one.  My thought
is to keep the long branch, but email the patches out in a few separate
serieses, with each depending on its predecessor.  For example, one series
from the big branch would be folding the ->gpnum and ->completed fields
into a single ->gp_seq, which helps the RCU-flavor consolidation task.
Another series suppresses some rare false-positive splats that have been
plaguing me for more than a year.  Yet another series within this huge
branch applies and optimizes funnel locking for grace-period startup.

The problem is that the conversion to ->gp_seq has a very large footprint,
which of course generates lots of conflicts.  I could of course collapse
these commits into a single commit, but if I did that I would also defer
to the merge window following v4.19 due to the resulting loss of bisection
within that change.

Any advice?

The commits are for-mingo..rcu/dev in my -rcu tree.

							Thanx, Paul

             reply	other threads:[~2018-05-17 14:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-17 14:40 Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2018-05-22 15:27 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-05-22 16:05   ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180517144044.GA6089@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --subject='Re: RCU branching for the v4.19 merge window' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).