LKML Archive on
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <>
To: Anson Huang <>
Cc: Mark Brown <>,,,,,
Subject: Applied "regulator: pfuze100: add .is_enable() for pfuze100_swb_regulator_ops" to the regulator tree
Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 18:13:02 +0100 (BST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

The patch

   regulator: pfuze100: add .is_enable() for pfuze100_swb_regulator_ops

has been applied to the regulator tree at 

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.  

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.


>From 0b01fd3d40fe6402e5fa3b491ef23109feb1aaa5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Anson Huang <>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 15:27:22 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] regulator: pfuze100: add .is_enable() for

If is_enabled() is not defined, regulator core will assume
this regulator is already enabled, then it can NOT be really
enabled after disabled.

Based on Li Jun's patch from the NXP kernel tree.

Signed-off-by: Anson Huang <>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <>
 drivers/regulator/pfuze100-regulator.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/pfuze100-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/pfuze100-regulator.c
index 053eb1ecf18d..677a070eeb1c 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/pfuze100-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/pfuze100-regulator.c
@@ -168,6 +168,7 @@ static const struct regulator_ops pfuze100_sw_regulator_ops = {
 static const struct regulator_ops pfuze100_swb_regulator_ops = {
 	.enable = regulator_enable_regmap,
 	.disable = regulator_disable_regmap,
+	.is_enabled = regulator_is_enabled_regmap,
 	.list_voltage = regulator_list_voltage_table,
 	.map_voltage = regulator_map_voltage_ascend,
 	.set_voltage_sel = regulator_set_voltage_sel_regmap,

  reply	other threads:[~2018-05-17 17:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-17  7:27 [PATCH 1/2] regulator: pfuze100: add enable/disable for switch Anson Huang
2018-05-17  7:27 ` [PATCH 2/2] regulator: pfuze100: add .is_enable() for pfuze100_swb_regulator_ops Anson Huang
2018-05-17 17:13   ` Mark Brown [this message]
2018-05-17 17:13 ` Applied "regulator: pfuze100: add enable/disable for switch" to the regulator tree Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \ \ \
    --subject='Re: Applied "regulator: pfuze100: add .is_enable() for pfuze100_swb_regulator_ops" to the regulator tree' \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).