LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: [RFC PATCH 01/11] prctl: Support movement of arch prctls out of common code
[not found] <5252accbd67022cea25e5aa80e48d95c.localhost>
@ 2018-05-23 10:14 ` Dave Martin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dave Martin @ 2018-05-23 10:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Will Deacon
Cc: linux-kernel, linux-arch, Andrew Morton, Benjamin Herrenschmidt,
Catalin Marinas, Fenghua Yu, H. Peter Anvin, Ingo Molnar,
Ivan Kokshaysky, James Hogan, Kees Cook, Matt Turner,
Michael Ellerman, Paul Mackerras, Ralf Baechle,
Richard Henderson, Rich Felker, Thomas Gleixner, Tony Luck, x86,
Yoshinori Sato
On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 07:28:26PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 06:14:17PM +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
> > The core framework for the prctl() syscall is unloved and looking
> > rather crusty these days. It also relies on defining ancillary
> > boilerplate macros for each prctl() in order to control conditional
> > compilation of the different prctl calls. We have better ways to
> > do this now, using Kconfig.
> >
> > This patch defines a new arch hook arch_syscall(). Architectures
> > that implemement arch-specific syscalls can now select
> > HAVE_ARCH_SYSCALL in their Kconfig and define this function
> > appropriately.
> >
> > The core prctl() implementation now matches option against the list
> > of common or legacy prctls, deferring to prctl_arch() if an
> > unrecognised option is encountered.
> >
> > (arch_prctl() would have been a nicer name, but it conflicts with the
> > pre-existing syscall of the same name on x86, particularly in the um
> > code.)
> >
> > No functional change.
>
> [...]
>
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/prctl.h b/include/uapi/linux/prctl.h
> > index af5f8c2..c911ff0 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/prctl.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/prctl.h
> > @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
> > /* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note */
> > -#ifndef _LINUX_PRCTL_H
> > -#define _LINUX_PRCTL_H
> > +#ifndef _UAPI_LINUX_PRCTL_H
> > +#define _UAPI_LINUX_PRCTL_H
>
> Is it safe to rename this #define, or is there a possibility that userspace
> could be using it for something and relying on it not changing?
>
> Other than that:
>
> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
I think that header guards are generally viewed as being private to a
project and not API. codesearch.debian.net yields few hits, where there
are actual #ifdefs on this symbol, they seem to be pastes of the kernel
headers:
https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=_LINUX_PRCTL_H&perpkg=1
-> android, linux, dietlibc ... gnome-chess (?)
There is plenty of precedent in the Howells special:
607ca46e97a1 ("UAPI: (Scripted) Disintegrate include/linux")
See for example <{,uapi/}linux/loop.h>.
Cheers
---Dave
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC PATCH 01/11] prctl: Support movement of arch prctls out of common code
2018-05-14 17:14 ` [RFC PATCH 01/11] prctl: Support movement of arch prctls out of common code Dave Martin
@ 2018-05-21 18:28 ` Will Deacon
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Will Deacon @ 2018-05-21 18:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave Martin
Cc: linux-kernel, linux-arch, Andrew Morton, Benjamin Herrenschmidt,
Catalin Marinas, Fenghua Yu, H. Peter Anvin, Ingo Molnar,
Ivan Kokshaysky, James Hogan, Kees Cook, Matt Turner,
Michael Ellerman, Paul Mackerras, Ralf Baechle,
Richard Henderson, Rich Felker, Thomas Gleixner, Tony Luck, x86,
Yoshinori Sato
Hi Dave,
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 06:14:17PM +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
> The core framework for the prctl() syscall is unloved and looking
> rather crusty these days. It also relies on defining ancillary
> boilerplate macros for each prctl() in order to control conditional
> compilation of the different prctl calls. We have better ways to
> do this now, using Kconfig.
>
> This patch defines a new arch hook arch_syscall(). Architectures
> that implemement arch-specific syscalls can now select
> HAVE_ARCH_SYSCALL in their Kconfig and define this function
> appropriately.
>
> The core prctl() implementation now matches option against the list
> of common or legacy prctls, deferring to prctl_arch() if an
> unrecognised option is encountered.
>
> (arch_prctl() would have been a nicer name, but it conflicts with the
> pre-existing syscall of the same name on x86, particularly in the um
> code.)
>
> No functional change.
[...]
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/prctl.h b/include/uapi/linux/prctl.h
> index af5f8c2..c911ff0 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/prctl.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/prctl.h
> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
> /* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note */
> -#ifndef _LINUX_PRCTL_H
> -#define _LINUX_PRCTL_H
> +#ifndef _UAPI_LINUX_PRCTL_H
> +#define _UAPI_LINUX_PRCTL_H
Is it safe to rename this #define, or is there a possibility that userspace
could be using it for something and relying on it not changing?
Other than that:
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Will
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [RFC PATCH 01/11] prctl: Support movement of arch prctls out of common code
2018-05-14 17:14 [RFC PATCH 00/11] prctl: Modernise wiring for optional prctl() calls Dave Martin
@ 2018-05-14 17:14 ` Dave Martin
2018-05-21 18:28 ` Will Deacon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dave Martin @ 2018-05-14 17:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Cc: linux-arch, Andrew Morton, Benjamin Herrenschmidt,
Catalin Marinas, Fenghua Yu, H. Peter Anvin, Ingo Molnar,
Ivan Kokshaysky, James Hogan, Kees Cook, Matt Turner,
Michael Ellerman, Paul Mackerras, Ralf Baechle,
Richard Henderson, Rich Felker, Thomas Gleixner, Tony Luck,
Will Deacon, x86, Yoshinori Sato
The core framework for the prctl() syscall is unloved and looking
rather crusty these days. It also relies on defining ancillary
boilerplate macros for each prctl() in order to control conditional
compilation of the different prctl calls. We have better ways to
do this now, using Kconfig.
This patch defines a new arch hook arch_syscall(). Architectures
that implemement arch-specific syscalls can now select
HAVE_ARCH_SYSCALL in their Kconfig and define this function
appropriately.
The core prctl() implementation now matches option against the list
of common or legacy prctls, deferring to prctl_arch() if an
unrecognised option is encountered.
(arch_prctl() would have been a nicer name, but it conflicts with the
pre-existing syscall of the same name on x86, particularly in the um
code.)
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>
Cc: James Hogan <jhogan@kernel.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
---
arch/Kconfig | 3 +++
include/linux/prctl.h | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
include/uapi/linux/prctl.h | 6 +++---
kernel/sys.c | 2 +-
tools/include/uapi/linux/prctl.h | 6 +++---
5 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 include/linux/prctl.h
diff --git a/arch/Kconfig b/arch/Kconfig
index 8e0d665..b34b3e8 100644
--- a/arch/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/Kconfig
@@ -969,4 +969,7 @@ config REFCOUNT_FULL
against various use-after-free conditions that can be used in
security flaw exploits.
+config HAVE_PRCTL_ARCH
+ bool
+
source "kernel/gcov/Kconfig"
diff --git a/include/linux/prctl.h b/include/linux/prctl.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..5ce3713
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/linux/prctl.h
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+#ifndef _LINUX_PRCTL_H
+#define _LINUX_PRCTL_H
+
+#include <linux/errno.h>
+#include <uapi/linux/prctl.h>
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_PRCTL_ARCH
+extern int prctl_arch(int option, unsigned long arg2,
+ unsigned long arg3, unsigned long arg4, unsigned long arg5);
+#else
+static inline int prctl_arch(int option, unsigned long arg2,
+ unsigned long arg3, unsigned long arg4, unsigned long arg5)
+{
+ return -EINVAL;
+}
+#endif
+
+#endif /* ! _LINUX_PRCTL_H */
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/prctl.h b/include/uapi/linux/prctl.h
index af5f8c2..c911ff0 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/prctl.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/prctl.h
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note */
-#ifndef _LINUX_PRCTL_H
-#define _LINUX_PRCTL_H
+#ifndef _UAPI_LINUX_PRCTL_H
+#define _UAPI_LINUX_PRCTL_H
#include <linux/types.h>
@@ -207,4 +207,4 @@ struct prctl_mm_map {
# define PR_SVE_VL_LEN_MASK 0xffff
# define PR_SVE_VL_INHERIT (1 << 17) /* inherit across exec */
-#endif /* _LINUX_PRCTL_H */
+#endif /* _UAPI_LINUX_PRCTL_H */
diff --git a/kernel/sys.c b/kernel/sys.c
index ad69218..5077f1e 100644
--- a/kernel/sys.c
+++ b/kernel/sys.c
@@ -2451,7 +2451,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(prctl, int, option, unsigned long, arg2, unsigned long, arg3,
error = SVE_GET_VL();
break;
default:
- error = -EINVAL;
+ error = prctl_arch(option, arg2, arg3, arg4, arg5);
break;
}
return error;
diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/prctl.h b/tools/include/uapi/linux/prctl.h
index af5f8c2..c911ff0 100644
--- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/prctl.h
+++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/prctl.h
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note */
-#ifndef _LINUX_PRCTL_H
-#define _LINUX_PRCTL_H
+#ifndef _UAPI_LINUX_PRCTL_H
+#define _UAPI_LINUX_PRCTL_H
#include <linux/types.h>
@@ -207,4 +207,4 @@ struct prctl_mm_map {
# define PR_SVE_VL_LEN_MASK 0xffff
# define PR_SVE_VL_INHERIT (1 << 17) /* inherit across exec */
-#endif /* _LINUX_PRCTL_H */
+#endif /* _UAPI_LINUX_PRCTL_H */
--
2.1.4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-05-23 10:15 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <5252accbd67022cea25e5aa80e48d95c.localhost>
2018-05-23 10:14 ` [RFC PATCH 01/11] prctl: Support movement of arch prctls out of common code Dave Martin
2018-05-14 17:14 [RFC PATCH 00/11] prctl: Modernise wiring for optional prctl() calls Dave Martin
2018-05-14 17:14 ` [RFC PATCH 01/11] prctl: Support movement of arch prctls out of common code Dave Martin
2018-05-21 18:28 ` Will Deacon
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).