LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Cc: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>,
	Linux I2C <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<patches@opensource.cirrus.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] i2c: Clear client->irq in i2c_device_remove
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2018 09:52:30 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181031095230.GK16508@imbe.wolfsonmicro.main> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181030145549.GB2459@kunai>

On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 02:55:50PM +0000, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> 
> > No, that's fine. Now I get this, and I totally agree with the approach:
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
> 
> Thanks! If one of you could provide me with a Fixes tag (for this. or
> both patches?), that would be most helpful.
> 

It's a bit of a long chain and fairly tricky to say exactly when
the bug was introduced but I think this is probably the closest
match:

Fixes: 2fd36c552649 ("i2c: core: Map OF IRQ at probe time")

I suspect the process of unbinding/rebinding would have also
not worked before that commit but it would have not worked
for different reasons.

Thanks,
Charles

  reply	other threads:[~2018-10-31  9:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-19  8:59 [PATCH 1/2] i2c: Remove unnecessary call to irq_find_mapping Charles Keepax
2018-10-19  8:59 ` [PATCH 2/2] i2c: Clear client->irq in i2c_device_remove Charles Keepax
2018-10-28 22:31   ` Wolfram Sang
2018-10-29 10:15     ` Benjamin Tissoires
2018-10-30 11:51       ` Charles Keepax
2018-10-30 14:34         ` Benjamin Tissoires
2018-10-30 14:55           ` Wolfram Sang
2018-10-31  9:52             ` Charles Keepax [this message]
2018-10-31  9:59               ` Wolfram Sang
2018-10-31 23:35   ` Wolfram Sang
2019-01-09 21:47   ` Yauhen Kharuzhy
2019-01-10 13:32     ` Charles Keepax
2019-01-10 20:35       ` Yauhen Kharuzhy
2018-10-28 22:30 ` [PATCH 1/2] i2c: Remove unnecessary call to irq_find_mapping Wolfram Sang
2018-10-29 10:13   ` Benjamin Tissoires
2018-10-31 23:34 ` Wolfram Sang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181031095230.GK16508@imbe.wolfsonmicro.main \
    --to=ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com \
    --cc=benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=patches@opensource.cirrus.com \
    --cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH 2/2] i2c: Clear client->irq in i2c_device_remove' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).