LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [REGRESSION] OCTEON MMC driver failure with v4.19 @ 2018-10-26 20:54 Aaro Koskinen 2018-11-05 22:06 ` Aaro Koskinen 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Aaro Koskinen @ 2018-10-26 20:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Robin Murphy, Christoph Hellwig, linux-mips, linux-kernel Hi, OCTEON (MIPS64) MMC driver probe fails with v4.19, because with commit 6c2fb2ea76361da9b420a8e23a2a19e7842cbdda Author: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> Date: Mon Jul 23 23:16:09 2018 +0100 of/device: Set bus DMA mask as appropriate we now get a default 32-bit bus DMA mask, and the device itself has 64-bit mask, so it gets rejected. With the current mainline, the driver is again working (probably because of b4ebe6063204 ("dma-direct: implement complete bus_dma_mask handling")). But I think this is just because I happen to have < 4 GB RAM, and it probably could still fail on bigger systems..? A. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [REGRESSION] OCTEON MMC driver failure with v4.19 2018-10-26 20:54 [REGRESSION] OCTEON MMC driver failure with v4.19 Aaro Koskinen @ 2018-11-05 22:06 ` Aaro Koskinen 2018-11-06 6:27 ` Christoph Hellwig 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Aaro Koskinen @ 2018-11-05 22:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Robin Murphy, Christoph Hellwig, Rob Herring, Paul Burton, linux-mips, linux-kernel Hi, On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 11:54:23PM +0300, Aaro Koskinen wrote: > OCTEON (MIPS64) MMC driver probe fails with v4.19, because with > > commit 6c2fb2ea76361da9b420a8e23a2a19e7842cbdda > Author: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> > Date: Mon Jul 23 23:16:09 2018 +0100 > > of/device: Set bus DMA mask as appropriate > > we now get a default 32-bit bus DMA mask, and the device itself has > 64-bit mask, so it gets rejected. > > With the current mainline, the driver is again working (probably > because of b4ebe6063204 ("dma-direct: implement complete bus_dma_mask > handling")). But I think this is just because I happen to have < 4 GB RAM, > and it probably could still fail on bigger systems..? With the below change, the MMC card probe seems to with v4.19. But it feels a bit hackish, don't you think... Is there some obvious simple fix that I'm missing? Any comments? diff --git a/arch/mips/cavium-octeon/octeon-platform.c b/arch/mips/cavium-octeon/octeon-platform.c index 807cadaf554e..31fab09fadcc 100644 --- a/arch/mips/cavium-octeon/octeon-platform.c +++ b/arch/mips/cavium-octeon/octeon-platform.c @@ -1067,8 +1067,29 @@ int __init octeon_prune_device_tree(void) return 0; } +static int octeon_device_notifier_call(struct notifier_block *nb, + unsigned long event, void *dev) +{ + struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev); + + if (event != BUS_NOTIFY_ADD_DEVICE || + !pdev || !pdev->dev.dma_mask || !pdev->dev.of_node) + return NOTIFY_DONE; + + if (of_device_is_compatible(pdev->dev.of_node, + "cavium,octeon-6130-mmc")) + *pdev->dev.dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(64); + + return NOTIFY_DONE; +} + +static struct notifier_block platform_nb = { + .notifier_call = octeon_device_notifier_call, +}; + static int __init octeon_publish_devices(void) { + bus_register_notifier(&platform_bus_type, &platform_nb); return of_platform_populate(NULL, octeon_ids, NULL, NULL); } arch_initcall(octeon_publish_devices); A. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [REGRESSION] OCTEON MMC driver failure with v4.19 2018-11-05 22:06 ` Aaro Koskinen @ 2018-11-06 6:27 ` Christoph Hellwig 2018-11-06 9:05 ` Aaro Koskinen 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2018-11-06 6:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Aaro Koskinen Cc: Robin Murphy, Christoph Hellwig, Rob Herring, Paul Burton, linux-mips, linux-kernel On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 12:06:32AM +0200, Aaro Koskinen wrote: > With the below change, the MMC card probe seems to with v4.19. But it > feels a bit hackish, don't you think... Is there some obvious simple > fix that I'm missing? Any comments? Please just use dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent in the platform drivers instead. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [REGRESSION] OCTEON MMC driver failure with v4.19 2018-11-06 6:27 ` Christoph Hellwig @ 2018-11-06 9:05 ` Aaro Koskinen 2018-11-06 21:51 ` Aaro Koskinen 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Aaro Koskinen @ 2018-11-06 9:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Robin Murphy, Rob Herring, Paul Burton, linux-mips, linux-kernel Hi, On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 07:27:24AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 12:06:32AM +0200, Aaro Koskinen wrote: > > With the below change, the MMC card probe seems to with v4.19. But it > > feels a bit hackish, don't you think... Is there some obvious simple > > fix that I'm missing? Any comments? > > Please just use dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent in the platform drivers > instead. Tried, but that doesn't help with v4.19: [ 1.290698] octeon_mmc 1180000002000.mmc: dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent(): -5 [ 1.297825] octeon_mmc: probe of 1180000002000.mmc failed with error -5 A. diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/cavium-octeon.c b/drivers/mmc/host/cavium-octeon.c index 22aded1065ae..f7ce26ba6936 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/host/cavium-octeon.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/cavium-octeon.c @@ -232,7 +232,8 @@ static int octeon_mmc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) */ host->reg_off_dma = -0x20; - ret = dma_set_mask(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64)); + ret = dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64)); + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent(): %d", ret); if (ret) return ret; ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [REGRESSION] OCTEON MMC driver failure with v4.19 2018-11-06 9:05 ` Aaro Koskinen @ 2018-11-06 21:51 ` Aaro Koskinen 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Aaro Koskinen @ 2018-11-06 21:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Robin Murphy, Rob Herring, Paul Burton, linux-mips, linux-kernel Hi, On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 11:05:11AM +0200, Aaro Koskinen wrote: > On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 07:27:24AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 12:06:32AM +0200, Aaro Koskinen wrote: > > > With the below change, the MMC card probe seems to with v4.19. But it > > > feels a bit hackish, don't you think... Is there some obvious simple > > > fix that I'm missing? Any comments? > > > > Please just use dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent in the platform drivers > > instead. > > Tried, but that doesn't help with v4.19: > > [ 1.290698] octeon_mmc 1180000002000.mmc: dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent(): -5 > [ 1.297825] octeon_mmc: probe of 1180000002000.mmc failed with error -5 > > A. Just for the archives, the fix is: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10670177/ A. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-11-06 21:52 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2018-10-26 20:54 [REGRESSION] OCTEON MMC driver failure with v4.19 Aaro Koskinen 2018-11-05 22:06 ` Aaro Koskinen 2018-11-06 6:27 ` Christoph Hellwig 2018-11-06 9:05 ` Aaro Koskinen 2018-11-06 21:51 ` Aaro Koskinen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).