LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	Rasmus Villemoes <Rasmus.Villemoes@prevas.se>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 4/5] net: dsa: implement vtu_getnext and vtu_loadpurge for mv88e6250
Date: Wed, 1 May 2019 19:32:13 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190501193126.19196-5-rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190501193126.19196-1-rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk>

These are almost identical to the 6185 variants, but have fewer bits
for the FID.

Bit 10 of the VTU_OP register (offset 0x05) is the VidPolicy bit,
which one should probably preserve in mv88e6xxx_g1_vtu_op(), instead
of always writing a 0. However, on the 6352 family, that bit is
located at bit 12 in the VTU FID register (offset 0x02), and is always
unconditionally cleared by the mv88e6xxx_g1_vtu_fid_write()
function.

Since nothing in the existing driver seems to know or care about that
bit, it seems reasonable to not add the boilerplate to preserve it for
the 6250 (which would require adding a chip-specific vtu_op function,
or adding chip-quirks to the existing one).

Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk>
---
 drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/global1.h     |  4 ++
 drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/global1_vtu.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 62 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/global1.h b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/global1.h
index bef01331266f..b205b0bba158 100644
--- a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/global1.h
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/global1.h
@@ -305,6 +305,10 @@ int mv88e6185_g1_vtu_getnext(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip,
 			     struct mv88e6xxx_vtu_entry *entry);
 int mv88e6185_g1_vtu_loadpurge(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip,
 			       struct mv88e6xxx_vtu_entry *entry);
+int mv88e6250_g1_vtu_getnext(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip,
+			     struct mv88e6xxx_vtu_entry *entry);
+int mv88e6250_g1_vtu_loadpurge(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip,
+			       struct mv88e6xxx_vtu_entry *entry);
 int mv88e6352_g1_vtu_getnext(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip,
 			     struct mv88e6xxx_vtu_entry *entry);
 int mv88e6352_g1_vtu_loadpurge(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip,
diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/global1_vtu.c b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/global1_vtu.c
index 058326924f3e..a8ef268c32cb 100644
--- a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/global1_vtu.c
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/global1_vtu.c
@@ -307,6 +307,35 @@ static int mv88e6xxx_g1_vtu_getnext(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip,
 	return mv88e6xxx_g1_vtu_vid_read(chip, entry);
 }
 
+int mv88e6250_g1_vtu_getnext(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip,
+			     struct mv88e6xxx_vtu_entry *entry)
+{
+	u16 val;
+	int err;
+
+	err = mv88e6xxx_g1_vtu_getnext(chip, entry);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+
+	if (entry->valid) {
+		err = mv88e6185_g1_vtu_data_read(chip, entry);
+		if (err)
+			return err;
+
+		/* VTU DBNum[3:0] are located in VTU Operation 3:0
+		 * VTU DBNum[5:4] are located in VTU Operation 9:8
+		 */
+		err = mv88e6xxx_g1_read(chip, MV88E6XXX_G1_VTU_OP, &val);
+		if (err)
+			return err;
+
+		entry->fid = val & 0x000f;
+		entry->fid |= (val & 0x0300) >> 4;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 int mv88e6185_g1_vtu_getnext(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip,
 			     struct mv88e6xxx_vtu_entry *entry)
 {
@@ -396,6 +425,35 @@ int mv88e6390_g1_vtu_getnext(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+int mv88e6250_g1_vtu_loadpurge(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip,
+			       struct mv88e6xxx_vtu_entry *entry)
+{
+	u16 op = MV88E6XXX_G1_VTU_OP_VTU_LOAD_PURGE;
+	int err;
+
+	err = mv88e6xxx_g1_vtu_op_wait(chip);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+
+	err = mv88e6xxx_g1_vtu_vid_write(chip, entry);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+
+	if (entry->valid) {
+		err = mv88e6185_g1_vtu_data_write(chip, entry);
+		if (err)
+			return err;
+
+		/* VTU DBNum[3:0] are located in VTU Operation 3:0
+		 * VTU DBNum[5:4] are located in VTU Operation 9:8
+		 */
+		op |= entry->fid & 0x000f;
+		op |= (entry->fid & 0x0030) << 8;
+	}
+
+	return mv88e6xxx_g1_vtu_op(chip, op);
+}
+
 int mv88e6185_g1_vtu_loadpurge(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip,
 			       struct mv88e6xxx_vtu_entry *entry)
 {
-- 
2.20.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-05-01 19:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-01 19:32 [RFC PATCH 0/5] net: dsa: POC support " Rasmus Villemoes
2019-05-01 19:32 ` [RFC PATCH 1/5] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: introduce support for two chips using direct smi addressing Rasmus Villemoes
2019-05-01 20:19   ` Andrew Lunn
2019-05-08  7:57     ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-05-08 11:47       ` Andrew Lunn
2019-05-08 13:41         ` Vivien Didelot
2019-05-01 19:32 ` [RFC PATCH 2/5] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: rename smi read/write functions Rasmus Villemoes
2019-05-03 21:57   ` Vivien Didelot
2019-05-06  5:57     ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-05-06 14:51       ` Vivien Didelot
2019-05-01 19:32 ` [RFC PATCH 3/5] net: dsa: prepare mv88e6xxx_g1_atu_op() for the mv88e6250 Rasmus Villemoes
2019-05-01 20:22   ` Andrew Lunn
2019-05-01 19:32 ` Rasmus Villemoes [this message]
2019-05-01 20:25   ` [RFC PATCH 4/5] net: dsa: implement vtu_getnext and vtu_loadpurge for mv88e6250 Andrew Lunn
2019-05-01 19:32 ` [RFC PATCH 5/5] net: dsa: add support " Rasmus Villemoes
2019-05-01 20:29   ` Andrew Lunn
2019-05-24  9:00 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] net: dsa: " Rasmus Villemoes
2019-05-24  9:00   ` [PATCH v2 1/5] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: introduce support for two chips using direct smi addressing Rasmus Villemoes
2019-05-24 14:13     ` Andrew Lunn
2019-05-24 17:54     ` Vivien Didelot
2019-05-24  9:00   ` [PATCH v2 2/5] net: dsa: prepare mv88e6xxx_g1_atu_op() for the mv88e6250 Rasmus Villemoes
2019-05-24 17:57     ` Vivien Didelot
2019-05-24  9:00   ` [PATCH v2 3/5] net: dsa: implement vtu_getnext and vtu_loadpurge for mv88e6250 Rasmus Villemoes
2019-05-24 18:02     ` Vivien Didelot
2019-05-24  9:00   ` [PATCH v2 4/5] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: implement watchdog_ops " Rasmus Villemoes
2019-05-24 14:20     ` Andrew Lunn
2019-05-24 18:05     ` Vivien Didelot
2019-05-24  9:00   ` [PATCH v2 5/5] net: dsa: add support " Rasmus Villemoes
2019-05-24 14:27     ` Andrew Lunn
2019-06-03  8:52       ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-06-03 12:45         ` Andrew Lunn
2019-05-24 18:11     ` Vivien Didelot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190501193126.19196-5-rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk \
    --to=rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk \
    --cc=Rasmus.Villemoes@prevas.se \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com \
    --subject='Re: [RFC PATCH 4/5] net: dsa: implement vtu_getnext and vtu_loadpurge for mv88e6250' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).