LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>,
Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RFC: console: hack up console_lock more v3
Date: Thu, 9 May 2019 14:31:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190509123104.GQ2589@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190509120903.28939-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 02:09:03PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Fix this by creating a prinkt_safe_up() which calls wake_up_process
> outside of the spinlock. This isn't correct in full generality, but
> good enough for console_lock:
>
> - console_lock doesn't use interruptible or killable or timeout down()
> calls, hence an up() is the only thing that can wake up a process.
Wrong :/ Any task can be woken at any random time. We must, at all
times, assume spurious wakeups will happen.
> +void printk_safe_up(struct semaphore *sem)
> +{
> + unsigned long flags;
> + struct semaphore_waiter *waiter = NULL;
> +
> + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->lock, flags);
> + if (likely(list_empty(&sem->wait_list))) {
> + sem->count++;
> + } else {
> + waiter = list_first_entry(&sem->wait_list,
> + struct semaphore_waiter, list);
> + list_del(&waiter->list);
> + waiter->up = true;
> + }
> + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->lock, flags);
> +
> + if (waiter) /* protected by being sole wake source */
> + wake_up_process(waiter->task);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(printk_safe_up);
Since its only used from printk, that EXPORT really isn't needed.
Something like the below might work.
---
kernel/locking/semaphore.c | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/semaphore.c b/kernel/locking/semaphore.c
index 561acdd39960..ac0a67e95aac 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/semaphore.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/semaphore.c
@@ -38,7 +38,6 @@ static noinline void __down(struct semaphore *sem);
static noinline int __down_interruptible(struct semaphore *sem);
static noinline int __down_killable(struct semaphore *sem);
static noinline int __down_timeout(struct semaphore *sem, long timeout);
-static noinline void __up(struct semaphore *sem);
/**
* down - acquire the semaphore
@@ -178,14 +177,24 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(down_timeout);
*/
void up(struct semaphore *sem)
{
+ struct semaphore_waiter *waiter;
+ DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q);
unsigned long flags;
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->lock, flags);
- if (likely(list_empty(&sem->wait_list)))
+ if (likely(list_empty(&sem->wait_list))) {
sem->count++;
- else
- __up(sem);
+ goto unlock;
+ }
+
+ waiter = list_first_entry(&sem->wait_list, struct semaphore_waiter, list);
+ list_del(&waiter->list);
+ waiter->up = true;
+ wake_q_add(&wake_q, waiter->task);
+unlock:
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->lock, flags);
+
+ wake_up_q(&wake_q);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(up);
@@ -252,12 +261,3 @@ static noinline int __sched __down_timeout(struct semaphore *sem, long timeout)
{
return __down_common(sem, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE, timeout);
}
-
-static noinline void __sched __up(struct semaphore *sem)
-{
- struct semaphore_waiter *waiter = list_first_entry(&sem->wait_list,
- struct semaphore_waiter, list);
- list_del(&waiter->list);
- waiter->up = true;
- wake_up_process(waiter->task);
-}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-09 12:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-09 12:09 Daniel Vetter
2019-05-09 12:21 ` Chris Wilson
2019-05-09 12:31 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2019-05-09 13:06 ` Daniel Vetter
2019-05-09 13:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-09 14:56 ` Petr Mladek
2019-05-09 16:43 ` Daniel Vetter
2019-05-10 9:15 ` Petr Mladek
2019-05-10 9:51 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-05-10 15:05 ` Daniel Vetter
2019-05-09 20:06 ` [PATCH] kernel/locking/semaphore: use wake_q in up() Daniel Vetter
2019-05-10 5:50 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-05-10 7:51 ` Daniel Vetter
2019-05-10 9:28 ` Petr Mladek
2019-05-10 15:20 ` Daniel Vetter
2019-05-15 11:53 ` Petr Mladek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190509123104.GQ2589@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--subject='Re: [PATCH] RFC: console: hack up console_lock more v3' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).