LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Nicolai Stange <nstange@suse.de>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
	Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
	Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@redhat.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>, Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	Nayna Jain <nayna@linux.ibm.com>,
	Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] x86/kprobes: Fix frame pointer annotations
Date: Thu, 9 May 2019 19:18:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190509171840.GZ2623@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <81170F0B-A2BB-4CD6-A1B5-5E7E0DDBC282@amacapital.net>

On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 09:20:06AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > +ENTRY(call_to_exception_trampoline)
> > +    /*
> > +     * On entry the stack looks like:
> > +     *
> > +     *   2*4(%esp) <previous context>
> > +     *   1*4(%esp) RET-IP
> > +     *   0*4(%esp) func
> > +     *
> > +     * transform this into:
> > +     *
> > +     *  19*4(%esp) <previous context>
> > +     *  18*4(%esp) gap / RET-IP
> > +     *  17*4(%esp) gap / func
> > +     *  16*4(%esp) ss
> > +     *  15*4(%esp) sp / <previous context>
> > +     *  14*4(%esp) flags
> > +     *  13*4(%esp) cs
> > +     *  12*4(%esp) ip / RET-IP
> > +     *  11*4(%esp) orig_eax
> > +     *  10*4(%esp) gs
> > +     *   9*4(%esp) fs
> > +     *   8*4(%esp) es
> > +     *   7*4(%esp) ds
> > +     *   6*4(%esp) eax
> > +     *   5*4(%esp) ebp
> > +     *   4*4(%esp) edi
> > +     *   3*4(%esp) esi
> > +     *   2*4(%esp) edx
> > +     *   1*4(%esp) ecx
> > +     *   0*4(%esp) ebx
> > +     */
> > +    pushl    %ss
> > +    pushl    %esp        # points at ss
> > +    addl    $3*4, (%esp)    #   point it at <previous context>
> > +    pushfl
> > +    pushl    %cs
> > +    pushl    5*4(%esp)    # RET-IP
> > +    subl    5, (%esp)    #   point at CALL instruction
> > +    pushl    $-1
> > +    pushl    %gs
> > +    pushl    %fs
> > +    pushl    %es
> > +    pushl    %ds
> > +    pushl    %eax
> > +    pushl    %ebp
> > +    pushl    %edi
> > +    pushl    %esi
> > +    pushl    %edx
> > +    pushl    %ecx
> > +    pushl    %ebx
> > +
> > +    ENCODE_FRAME_POINTER
> > +
> > +    movl    %esp, %eax    # 1st argument: pt_regs
> > +
> > +    movl    17*4(%esp), %ebx    # func
> > +    CALL_NOSPEC %ebx
> > +
> > +    movl    PT_OLDESP(%esp), %eax
> > +
> > +    movl    PT_EIP(%esp), %ecx
> > +    movl    %ecx, -1*4(%eax)
> > +
> > +    movl    PT_EFLAGS(%esp), %ecx
> > +    movl    %ecx, -2*4(%eax)
> > +
> > +    movl    PT_EAX(%esp), %ecx
> > +    movl    %ecx, -3*4(%eax)
> > +
> > +    popl    %ebx
> > +    popl    %ecx
> > +    popl    %edx
> > +    popl    %esi
> > +    popl    %edi
> > +    popl    %ebp
> > +
> > +    lea    -3*4(%eax), %esp
> > +    popl    %eax
> > +    popfl
> > +    ret
> > +END(call_to_exception_trampoline)

> Potentially minor nit: you’re doing popfl, but you’re not doing
> TRACE_IRQ_whatever.  This makes me think that you should either add
> the tracing (ugh!) or you should maybe just skip the popfl.

Yeah, so we really should not change flags I suppose. If this lives I'll
remove the popfl.

  reply	other threads:[~2019-05-09 17:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-08  7:49 [PATCH 0/4] x86: int3 fallout Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-08  7:49 ` [PATCH 1/4] x86/entry/32: Clean up return from interrupt preemption path Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-08  7:49 ` [PATCH 2/4] x86/kprobes: Fix frame pointer annotations Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-08 11:54   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-05-08 12:04     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-08 12:40       ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-08 12:42       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-05-08 15:39         ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-08 18:48           ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-05-09  1:20             ` Masami Hiramatsu
2019-05-09  8:14               ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-09  9:27                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-09 14:00                 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-05-09 14:01                 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2019-05-09 17:14                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-10  4:58                     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2019-05-10 12:31                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-11  0:52                         ` Masami Hiramatsu
2019-05-10 12:40                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-11  0:56                         ` Masami Hiramatsu
2019-05-13  8:15                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-09 16:20                 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-05-09 17:18                   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2019-05-09 17:43                   ` Steven Rostedt
2019-05-10  3:21                     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2019-05-10 12:14                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-10 12:17                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-10 14:54                         ` Steven Rostedt
2019-05-09 17:37                 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-05-09 18:26                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-09 18:36                     ` Steven Rostedt
2019-05-08  7:49 ` [PATCH 3/4] x86/ftrace: Add pt_regs frame annotations Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-08  7:49 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/4] x86_32: Provide consistent pt_regs Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-08 11:57   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-05-08 12:46     ` Ingo Molnar
2019-05-08 20:58   ` Linus Torvalds

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190509171840.GZ2623@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=jikos@kernel.org \
    --cc=joe.lawrence@redhat.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=jroedel@suse.de \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=nayna@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=nstange@suse.de \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
    --cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH 2/4] x86/kprobes: Fix frame pointer annotations' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).