LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Nicolai Stange <nstange@suse.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org, Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@redhat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>, Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
Nayna Jain <nayna@linux.ibm.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] x86/kprobes: Fix frame pointer annotations
Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 14:31:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190510123131.GU2589@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190510135831.c4ad309c68fc254f819194fc@kernel.org>
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 01:58:31PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> On Thu, 9 May 2019 19:14:16 +0200
> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> > Ideally also the optimized kprobe trampoline, but I've not managed to
> > fully comprehend that one.
>
> As you pointed in other reply, save/restore can be a macro, but
> each trampoline code is slightly different. Optprobe template has
> below parts
>
> (jumped from probed address)
> [store regs]
> [setup function arguments (pt_regs and probed address)]
> [handler call]
> [restore regs]
> [execute copied instruction]
instruction_s_ ?
The JMP to this trampoline is likely 5 bytes and could have clobbered
multiple instructions, we'd then have to place them all here, and
> [jump back to probed address]
jump to after whatever instructions were clobbered by the JMP.
> Note that there is a limitation that if it is optiomized probe, user
> handler can not change regs->ip. (we can not use "ret" after executed
> a copied instruction, which must run on same stack)
Changing regs->ip in this case is going to be massively dodgy indeed :-)
But so would changing much else; changing stack layout would also be
somewhat tricky.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-10 12:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-08 7:49 [PATCH 0/4] x86: int3 fallout Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-08 7:49 ` [PATCH 1/4] x86/entry/32: Clean up return from interrupt preemption path Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-08 7:49 ` [PATCH 2/4] x86/kprobes: Fix frame pointer annotations Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-08 11:54 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-05-08 12:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-08 12:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-08 12:42 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-05-08 15:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-08 18:48 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-05-09 1:20 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2019-05-09 8:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-09 9:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-09 14:00 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-05-09 14:01 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2019-05-09 17:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-10 4:58 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2019-05-10 12:31 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2019-05-11 0:52 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2019-05-10 12:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-11 0:56 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2019-05-13 8:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-09 16:20 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-05-09 17:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-09 17:43 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-05-10 3:21 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2019-05-10 12:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-10 12:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-10 14:54 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-05-09 17:37 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-05-09 18:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-09 18:36 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-05-08 7:49 ` [PATCH 3/4] x86/ftrace: Add pt_regs frame annotations Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-08 7:49 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/4] x86_32: Provide consistent pt_regs Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-08 11:57 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-05-08 12:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2019-05-08 20:58 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190510123131.GU2589@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=jikos@kernel.org \
--cc=joe.lawrence@redhat.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=jroedel@suse.de \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=nayna@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=nstange@suse.de \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
--subject='Re: [PATCH 2/4] x86/kprobes: Fix frame pointer annotations' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).