LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
To: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] vsock/virtio: limit the memory used per-socket
Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 16:25:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190516152533.GB29808@stefanha-x1.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190510125843.95587-2-sgarzare@redhat.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2164 bytes --]

On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 02:58:36PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> +struct virtio_vsock_buf {

Please add a comment describing the purpose of this struct and to
differentiate its use from struct virtio_vsock_pkt.

> +static struct virtio_vsock_buf *
> +virtio_transport_alloc_buf(struct virtio_vsock_pkt *pkt, bool zero_copy)
> +{
> +	struct virtio_vsock_buf *buf;
> +
> +	if (pkt->len == 0)
> +		return NULL;
> +
> +	buf = kzalloc(sizeof(*buf), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!buf)
> +		return NULL;
> +
> +	/* If the buffer in the virtio_vsock_pkt is full, we can move it to
> +	 * the new virtio_vsock_buf avoiding the copy, because we are sure that
> +	 * we are not use more memory than that counted by the credit mechanism.
> +	 */
> +	if (zero_copy && pkt->len == pkt->buf_len) {
> +		buf->addr = pkt->buf;
> +		pkt->buf = NULL;
> +	} else {
> +		buf->addr = kmalloc(pkt->len, GFP_KERNEL);

buf and buf->addr could be allocated in a single call, though I'm not
sure how big an optimization this is.

> @@ -841,20 +882,24 @@ virtio_transport_recv_connected(struct sock *sk,
>  {
>  	struct vsock_sock *vsk = vsock_sk(sk);
>  	struct virtio_vsock_sock *vvs = vsk->trans;
> +	struct virtio_vsock_buf *buf;
>  	int err = 0;
>  
>  	switch (le16_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.op)) {
>  	case VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_RW:
>  		pkt->len = le32_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.len);
> -		pkt->off = 0;
> +		buf = virtio_transport_alloc_buf(pkt, true);
>  
> -		spin_lock_bh(&vvs->rx_lock);
> -		virtio_transport_inc_rx_pkt(vvs, pkt);
> -		list_add_tail(&pkt->list, &vvs->rx_queue);
> -		spin_unlock_bh(&vvs->rx_lock);
> +		if (buf) {
> +			spin_lock_bh(&vvs->rx_lock);
> +			virtio_transport_inc_rx_pkt(vvs, pkt->len);
> +			list_add_tail(&buf->list, &vvs->rx_queue);
> +			spin_unlock_bh(&vvs->rx_lock);
>  
> -		sk->sk_data_ready(sk);
> -		return err;
> +			sk->sk_data_ready(sk);
> +		}

The return value of this function isn't used but the code still makes an
effort to return errors.  Please return -ENOMEM when buf == NULL.

If you'd like to remove the return value that's fine too, but please do
it for the whole function to be consistent.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-05-16 15:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-10 12:58 [PATCH v2 0/8] vsock/virtio: optimizations to increase the throughput Stefano Garzarella
2019-05-10 12:58 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] vsock/virtio: limit the memory used per-socket Stefano Garzarella
2019-05-12 16:57   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-05-13 16:40     ` Stefano Garzarella
2019-05-13  9:58   ` Jason Wang
2019-05-13 17:23     ` Stefano Garzarella
2019-05-14  3:25       ` Jason Wang
2019-05-14  3:40         ` Jason Wang
2019-05-14 16:35         ` Stefano Garzarella
2019-05-15  2:48           ` Jason Wang
2019-05-28 16:45             ` Stefano Garzarella
2019-05-29  0:59               ` Jason Wang
2019-05-16 15:25   ` Stefan Hajnoczi [this message]
2019-05-17  8:25     ` Stefano Garzarella
2019-05-20  8:57       ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-05-10 12:58 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] vsock/virtio: free packets during the socket release Stefano Garzarella
2019-05-10 22:20   ` David Miller
2019-05-11  8:27     ` Stefano Garzarella
2019-05-16 15:32   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-05-17  8:26     ` Stefano Garzarella
2019-05-10 12:58 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] vsock/virtio: fix locking for fwd_cnt and buf_alloc Stefano Garzarella
2019-05-10 12:58 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] vsock/virtio: reduce credit update messages Stefano Garzarella
2019-05-10 12:58 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] vhost/vsock: split packets to send using multiple buffers Stefano Garzarella
2019-05-10 12:58 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] vsock/virtio: change the maximum packet size allowed Stefano Garzarella
2019-05-10 12:58 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] vsock/virtio: increase RX buffer size to 64 KiB Stefano Garzarella
2019-05-13 10:01   ` Jason Wang
2019-05-13 17:51     ` Stefano Garzarella
2019-05-14  3:38       ` Jason Wang
2019-05-14 16:20         ` Stefano Garzarella
2019-05-15  2:50           ` Jason Wang
2019-05-15  8:22             ` Stefano Garzarella
2019-05-10 12:58 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] vsock/virtio: make the RX buffer size tunable Stefano Garzarella
2019-05-13 10:05   ` Jason Wang
2019-05-13 12:46     ` Jason Wang
2019-05-14 16:10       ` Stefano Garzarella
2019-05-13  9:33 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] vsock/virtio: optimizations to increase the throughput Jason Wang
2019-05-13 16:49   ` Stefano Garzarella
2019-05-20 14:09   ` Stefano Garzarella

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190516152533.GB29808@stefanha-x1.localdomain \
    --to=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).