From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82185C04AB4 for ; Fri, 17 May 2019 09:47:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FD7420833 for ; Fri, 17 May 2019 09:47:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727984AbfEQJrb (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 May 2019 05:47:31 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:36563 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727537AbfEQJrb (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 May 2019 05:47:31 -0400 Received: by newverein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2005) id D876F68B02; Fri, 17 May 2019 11:47:08 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 11:47:08 +0200 From: Torsten Duwe To: Maxime Ripard Cc: Vasily Khoruzhick , David Airlie , Daniel Vetter , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Thierry Reding , Chen-Yu Tsai , Andrzej Hajda , Laurent Pinchart , Icenowy Zheng , Sean Paul , Harald Geyer , dri-devel , devicetree , arm-linux , linux-kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] arm64: DTS: allwinner: a64: enable ANX6345 bridge on Teres-I Message-ID: <20190517094708.GA16858@lst.de> References: <20190514160241.9EAC768C7B@newverein.lst.de> <20190515093141.41016b11@blackhole.lan> <20190516154820.GA10431@lst.de> <20190516164859.GB10431@lst.de> <20190517072738.deohh5fly4jxms7k@flea> <20190517101353.3e86d696@blackhole.lan> <20190517090845.oujs33nplbaxcyun@flea> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190517090845.oujs33nplbaxcyun@flea> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 11:08:45AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > > > So for all current practical purposes, we can assume the Teres-I panel > > to be powered properly and providing valid EDID; nothing to worry about > > in software. > > You're creating a generic binding for all the users of that bridge, > while considering only the specific case of the Teres-I. All I'm saying is that _this_ usage is also valid. Nothing keeps other users from defining the output panel; on the contrary: the driver at hand already considers an _optional_ panel and handles it, conditionally. So driver and binding spec are 100% in sync here. This is much more straightforward than requiring an output and making up some dummy code and params because it cannot reasonably be handled. (Remember, if there is an output, the driver will make calls to the "attached device" driver.) Torsten